Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,724
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kraken613
    Newest Member
    kraken613
    Joined

February 11-12; 12-13: Are they real??


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

Does the existing snow pack impact the 2m temps?  Always wondered that.  

I don't have all the details but yes it does. Not sure how it determines melting rates, radiation effectiveness, or anything like that. Existing snowcover is a data input at simulation start

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DDweatherman said:

Cue the windshield wiper GIF, if there’s a true NW trend it usually materializes in the last 36-48 hours. Look at yesterdays event

Agreed. The s/w for Tue-Wed is still off the CA and Baja coast. It will enter the conus tonight or early tomorrow morning. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wxmvpete said:

Last five runs of the GEFS for 24-hr snowfall probabilities >4". Shows the current 12Z GFS snowfall footprint is south of the ensembles while also being south of the rest of guidance with snow in south-central VA. Still likes northern VA most. Note however with the warm nose aloft closer to the central VA and a pretty narrow DGZ, I think those areas on the southern periphery (including along and south of I-66) may be hard pressed to have SLRs of 10:1 for the peak of the event. It's why snowfall is less on the Kuchera compared to the straight 10:1 SLR maps.

trend-gefsens-2025020906-f084.sn10_024h-prob04.us_ma.gif

Good observation, Pete! One of the reasons I like the Rt50 corridor at this juncture as the 85H FGEN alignment looks decent for areas along and south of the Rt50 latitude. Further north could very well achieve the closer 10:1 ratio, so they have the benefit of having both variables achieve success. 
 

I think this event is like a 60-80% version of 1/6 along and south of I-70. The main difference is a little more WSW-ENE alignment to the primary QPF field, so areas downstream of Rt15 might be a little better within the moisture advection pattern. Nothing crazy, but definitely a little better than the straight east-west orientation from the previous event. Thanks for keeping everyone abreast on the adjustments and analysis. I’ll be back on Tuesday to man the fort in Ops :)

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Some snow weenie in NE MD did something very very bad. One of y’all needs to fess up so they can make whatever sacrifice is necessary. 
IMG_7251.thumb.png.04adc3c28aa5f9c38c8ae77bae7558d8.png

https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExc3JyN2hybXlnMjNrZWcwenV3amtocXJhMmdtajlqaGZpMndpbHY1YyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/l1IBiEzytfXFtkPVm/giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, arlwx12 said:

I'm a bit puzzled.

Can someone please explain to me how NWS says DCA gets over 4" of snow when the temperature is scheduled to be above freezing at that spot for the entire event?

Is this event "decorator snow" versus ground depth?

Keep in mind snow isn’t measured on pavement. It’s measured on snow boards and if not then grass. DCA can get 4” of snow from this with temps around 32 which is what models are generally projecting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...