Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,729
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kraken613
    Newest Member
    kraken613
    Joined

Feb 9: Iggles flying, weenies high-fivin’: the kickoff to a great stretch


mahk_webstah
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

And all the angst yesterday from Wiz about poor snow growth and crap rates and what not…And WPC puts that out about how efficient and prolific the rates will be.  Enjoy gentlemen. 

I wouldn't say SLR will be poor, but I wouldn't be banking prolific for most of SNE. Maybe 10ish:1 PVD to BDL, 10-15:1 around ORH, and once you get up into NH there is some potential for a 300 mb deep DGZ and SLRs could be tickling 20:1.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OceanStWx said:

I wouldn't say SLR will be poor, but I wouldn't be banking prolific for most of SNE. Maybe 10ish:1 PVD to BDL, 10-15:1 around ORH, and once you get up into NH there is some potential for a 300 mb deep DGZ and SLRs could be tickling 20:1.

A shame the best snow will be falling at night.  I love going out for walks and that sort of perfect snow growth heavy snow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mahk_webstah said:

WPC discussion sounds great for many. Indeed there will be a lot of high-fiving across this whole region. 1 to 2 in./h, possibly exceeding 2 in./hr

As the parent shortwave continues to track progressively to the
east, the accompanying forcing and moisture will also pivot with
it, and secondary low pressure development is likely off of the NJ
coast late Saturday night into Sunday morning. This low will become
dominant and intensify as zonal but modestly coupled jet structures
interact with a baroclinic zone offshore. As this low deepens and
moves almost due east south of New England, it will cross near the
Benchmark (40N/70W), leading to a substantial snow event for
Upstate NY, the Poconos, and at least Southern New England (SNE),
although there remains uncertainty into how far north (or south)
the heaviest snow will spread. As the low deepens and pulls away to
the east, a renewed surge of cold air both through the
ageostrophic flow into the low and the subsequent CAA in its wake
will limit the progress of the warm nose, while dry air to the
north noted in regional soundings inhibits PWs from aggressively
lifting towards Canada. In between, an axis of heavy snow is likely
as strong WAA produces impressive 850-600mb fgen, producing strong
ascent into the DGZ. The overlap of this strong fgen with some
theta-e lapse rates approaching 0C/km suggests banding potential
from Upstate NY into SNE, and with elevated SLRs, snowfall rates of
1-2"/hr appear likely. Total snowfall will be limited by the speed
of this system as it will only snow in most areas for 12-18 hours,
but this will still result in heavy accumulations. WPC
probabilities for more than 6 inches of snow are high (>70%) from
the Mohawk Valley of NY eastward into much of MA, southern VT,
southern NH, and the southeastern tip of ME. Locally 8-12" of snow
is possible in some areas.

I think they mean southwestern tip of Maine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

ill take the over for most..  NWS has 4 to 7 for the warning.. my call from yesterday morning was 6 to 9 and sticking with it

Go with your Zone.  6-10" north of the CT/RI border.  Haven't looked south of that.

I'm guessing Ray's area will walk away with the Jack.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

I wouldn't say SLR will be poor, but I wouldn't be banking prolific for most of SNE. Maybe 10ish:1 PVD to BDL, 10-15:1 around ORH, and once you get up into NH there is some potential for a 300 mb deep DGZ and SLRs could be tickling 20:1.

Was just going by what WPC said in their discussion about rates in SNE.  But what you say makes sense. 

  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

I'm on board with 1/hr for SNE, but ratios look pretty climo to me. It's the dendy band that may be pure air.

Probably crushed down by meatier snow Wednesday night and Thursday.  Are you guys planning to warn the public about what’s coming this week? I mean, they already may be looking at the Kuchera maps on Facebook so God knows that they think the apocalypse is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Probably crushed down by meatier snow Wednesday night and Thursday.  Are you guys planning to warn the public about what’s coming this week? I mean, they already may be looking at the Kuchera maps on Facebook so God knows that they think the apocalypse is here.

I mean to the extent we can, yes. We're briefing partners about more snow and our long range messaging has it, but we won't be doing QPF for that event for a couple days. 

hazards_d3_7_contours.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

And all the angst yesterday from Wiz about poor snow growth and crap rates and what not…And WPC puts that out about how efficient and prolific the rates will be.  Enjoy gentlemen. 

What? I said same growth and rates would be great under the heaviest fronto bands (1” per hour rates) with ratios 12:1 to 15:1 and even out that in the discussion in the blog post I posted with my forecast. 
 

I said outside of this the rates and ratios could be poor or snow growth could struggle

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

What? I said same growth and rates would be great under the heaviest fronto bands (1” per hour rates) with ratios 12:1 to 15:1 and even out that in the discussion in the blog post I posted with my forecast. 
 

I said outside of this the rates and ratios could be poor or snow growth could struggle

I didn’t see your blog post. But I remember a post yesterday here where you were very worried about snow growth and wanted to take your accumulation call down, due to that.  Just thought you were worrying and stressing a lot about poor snow growth and the like. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said:

Albany with their typical fashion gives me 8-14... Is there any model that backs that up?a55bf6abf2c504e26354f8ae8f5ec0c1.jpg

Sent from my SM-S156V using Tapatalk
 

I'd skip trying to do the math on those things.......the ZFP smooths out the timing.

 

Detailed forecast for

Western Windham

Today
Partly sunny with scattered snow showers this morning, then mostly cloudy this afternoon. Cold with highs in the mid 20s. West winds 5 to 10 mph. Chance of snow 20 percent.
Tonight
Snow. Snow may be heavy at times. Snow accumulation of 8 to 12 inches. Cold with lows around 18. South winds around 5 mph, becoming east after midnight. Chance of snow near 100 percent.
Sunday
Mostly cloudy. Snow likely, mainly in the morning. Total snow accumulation of 8 to 12 inches possible. Cold with highs in the upper 20s. Northwest winds 5 to 10 mph. Chance of snow 70 percen
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

I didn’t see your blog post. But I remember a post yesterday here where you were very worried about snow growth and wanted to take your accumulation call down, due to that.  Just thought you were worrying and stressing a lot about poor snow growth and the like. 

Gotcha, I did have some worries that because the duration of those heavier rates looked relatively short whether the common totals would be more of 4-5” versus 6-7”. And Outside of the fronto bands I was a little worried we won’t accumulate efficiently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...