Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,722
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    BlazerTAGDE
    Newest Member
    BlazerTAGDE
    Joined

Discussion-OBS Weekend Feb 8-9 Another mainly 12 hour snow-ice event possibly changing to rain before ending Sunday. NYC-LI-S of I78 on the edge?


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

There's a ton of notable events in the analogs but to me none of them resemble this.  The problem with CIPS is it tends to grab by region so the pattern overall may not be close.  3/19/92 has some similarities but the pattern was may more favorable in Canada that kept that storm more south.  To me 12/19/08 is actually the closest match to this storm.

 

https://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/NARR/2008/us1219.php

https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=EC&fhr=F060&rundt=2025020612&map=thbCOOP72

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

There's a ton of notable events in the analogs but to me none of them resemble this.  The problem with CIPS is it tends to grab by region so the pattern overall may not be close.  3/19/92 has some similarities but the pattern was may more favorable in Canada that kept that storm more south.  To me 12/19/08 is actually the closest match to this storm.

 

https://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/NARR/2008/us1219.php

https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=EC&fhr=F060&rundt=2025020612&map=thbCOOP72

That 1992 storm gave 6 inches to NYC but less than 4 at JFK if I remember correctly, it kept going back and forth depending on ptype and we never had much snowdepth during that storm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

That 1992 storm gave 6 inches to NYC but less than 4 at JFK if I remember correctly, it kept going back and forth depending on ptype and we never had much snowdepth during that storm.

 

I think LGA/JFK stayed all snow, JFK may have had PL mixed in at times, it was anticipated we'd change to rain and we never did but the March sun angle and marginal temps led to tons of melting and compacting.  I measured 7 at the time in Astoria and LGA reported close to that but if that event was 4-5 weeks earlier we'd have had a foot

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I think LGA/JFK stayed all snow, JFK may have had PL mixed in at times, it was anticipated we'd change to rain and we never did but the March sun angle and marginal temps led to tons of melting and compacting.  I measured 7 at the time in Astoria and LGA reported close to that but if that event was 4-5 weeks earlier we'd have had a foot

Was that the first 6" snowstorm in a few years?

yes that March sun angle definitely did it, I remember a lot of melting during lulls.

We had a similar storm around March 21, 1994 the last storm in that excellent winter, 4 inches all snow (just like the first storm that winter back around the winter solstice in December), but during lulls in intensity the snowcover would melt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BoulderWX said:

2-3” on the GFS before the changeover. Best snow continues to be over SNE for this one. 

I would say the best snow continues to be interior SENY, orange , Putnam and Dutchess as is more often the case. Coastal SNE more often than not does poorly on these, no better than the northshore of LI. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

I would say the best snow continues to be interior SENY, orange , Putnam and Dutchess as is more often the case. Coastal SNE more often than not does poorly on these, no better than the northshore of LI. 

Boston will probably do quite well. I'd say over 6". N shore might get 1" more than the S shore gets. I wouldn't go higher than 2-3" for the NYC area at this point. If we see more N bumps, more like 1-2". I-84 to I-90 is the best zone for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Boston will probably do quite well. I'd say over 6". N shore might get 1" more than the S shore gets. I wouldn't go higher than 2-3" for the NYC area at this point. If we see more N bumps, more like 1-2". I-84 to I-90 is the best zone for this. 

I get the pessimism but im seeing a stronger confluence in SE Canada 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dmillz25 said:

I get the pessimism but im seeing a stronger confluence in SE Canada 

Maybe the Euro AI can save us all. This type of storm isn’t favorable for places along I-80 and south latitude. You get a diamond once in a blue moon like 2/22/08 but most are lousy disappointments while I-90 cleans up. If we can develop confluence or resistance over SE Canada it could be a game changer but otherwise this type of system tries to pump ridging ahead of it and come north especially when it’s a more consolidated system with more access to moisture. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Maybe the Euro AI can save us all. This type of storm isn’t favorable for places along I-80 and south latitude. You get a diamond once in a blue moon like 2/22/08 but most are lousy disappointments while I-90 cleans up. If we can develop confluence or resistance over SE Canada it could be a game changer but otherwise this type of system tries to pump ridging ahead of it and come north especially when it’s a more consolidated system with more access to moisture. 

I get it and Ive seen it more often than not but with how it’s looking so far its a rather strong confluence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LibertyBell said:

For ice storm warnings I think it's half an inch of ice though not completely sure.

There is no separate warning for sleet as the totals are integrated into snowfall totals. 2-3:1 ratio.

WWA begins at 1 inch here.

3 inches of snow and 0.1 ice would be WWA (I think) BUT 4 inches of snow + some ice would be a WSW (I've seen WSW for 4-6 inches of snow before.)

4-6 inches is the minimum for WSW from what I've seen.

 

Advisories north of 276/195 are for 3" not 1" (and 2" south of 276/195); but advisories can be posted for less snowfall when freezing rain over 0.01" is expected, as we just saw today.  Also, I was once told by a NWS person that the criterion for a county needs to be met for at least half of that county, i.e., a warning for Essex County, for example is where 6" is expected for at least half of the county (which is why so many counties with often sharp gradients are split in half).  The maps below are at the linked website.

https://www.weather.gov/phi/WinterWx

 

12 Hour Advisory Snowfall:

New_12hour_WWY_Criteria_2015-16.png

 

12 Hour Snowfall Warning Criteria

New_12hour_WSW_Criteria_2015-16.png

 

Ice Storm Warning Crtieria

ER_FZ_Rain_WRNG_Criteria(1).jpg

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z NAM and ICON, fwiw...still think the NAM map with the "hole" in CNJ is improbable (I get a bigger early thump SW of CNJ and more N of CNJ with the later coastal, but not sure I've ever seen this before).  

Also, kind of curious if folks in this forum like seeing the zoomed in Pivotal maps or the regional mid-Atlantic or NEUS maps.  

sn10_acc-imp.us_state_ne_s.png

sn10_acc-imp.us_state_ne_s.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...