weatherpruf Posted Thursday at 09:10 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:10 PM The parade of piddly events continues. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted Thursday at 09:14 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:14 PM There's a ton of notable events in the analogs but to me none of them resemble this. The problem with CIPS is it tends to grab by region so the pattern overall may not be close. 3/19/92 has some similarities but the pattern was may more favorable in Canada that kept that storm more south. To me 12/19/08 is actually the closest match to this storm. https://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/NARR/2008/us1219.php https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=EC&fhr=F060&rundt=2025020612&map=thbCOOP72 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM 10 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said: There's a ton of notable events in the analogs but to me none of them resemble this. The problem with CIPS is it tends to grab by region so the pattern overall may not be close. 3/19/92 has some similarities but the pattern was may more favorable in Canada that kept that storm more south. To me 12/19/08 is actually the closest match to this storm. https://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/NARR/2008/us1219.php https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=EC&fhr=F060&rundt=2025020612&map=thbCOOP72 That 1992 storm gave 6 inches to NYC but less than 4 at JFK if I remember correctly, it kept going back and forth depending on ptype and we never had much snowdepth during that storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted Thursday at 09:28 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:28 PM 2 minutes ago, LibertyBell said: That 1992 storm gave 6 inches to NYC but less than 4 at JFK if I remember correctly, it kept going back and forth depending on ptype and we never had much snowdepth during that storm. I think LGA/JFK stayed all snow, JFK may have had PL mixed in at times, it was anticipated we'd change to rain and we never did but the March sun angle and marginal temps led to tons of melting and compacting. I measured 7 at the time in Astoria and LGA reported close to that but if that event was 4-5 weeks earlier we'd have had a foot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted Thursday at 09:35 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:35 PM 6 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said: I think LGA/JFK stayed all snow, JFK may have had PL mixed in at times, it was anticipated we'd change to rain and we never did but the March sun angle and marginal temps led to tons of melting and compacting. I measured 7 at the time in Astoria and LGA reported close to that but if that event was 4-5 weeks earlier we'd have had a foot Was that the first 6" snowstorm in a few years? yes that March sun angle definitely did it, I remember a lot of melting during lulls. We had a similar storm around March 21, 1994 the last storm in that excellent winter, 4 inches all snow (just like the first storm that winter back around the winter solstice in December), but during lulls in intensity the snowcover would melt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoulderWX Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM 2-3” on the GFS before the changeover. Best snow continues to be over SNE for this one. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPcantmeasuresnow Posted Thursday at 10:17 PM Share Posted Thursday at 10:17 PM 19 minutes ago, BoulderWX said: 2-3” on the GFS before the changeover. Best snow continues to be over SNE for this one. I would say the best snow continues to be interior SENY, orange , Putnam and Dutchess as is more often the case. Coastal SNE more often than not does poorly on these, no better than the northshore of LI. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Thursday at 10:33 PM Share Posted Thursday at 10:33 PM 18z ukie 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted Thursday at 10:45 PM Share Posted Thursday at 10:45 PM 49 minutes ago, BoulderWX said: 2-3” on the GFS before the changeover. Best snow continues to be over SNE for this one. Snow map? I never can seem to find it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted Thursday at 11:11 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:11 PM 52 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said: I would say the best snow continues to be interior SENY, orange , Putnam and Dutchess as is more often the case. Coastal SNE more often than not does poorly on these, no better than the northshore of LI. Boston will probably do quite well. I'd say over 6". N shore might get 1" more than the S shore gets. I wouldn't go higher than 2-3" for the NYC area at this point. If we see more N bumps, more like 1-2". I-84 to I-90 is the best zone for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmillz25 Posted Thursday at 11:28 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:28 PM 15 minutes ago, jm1220 said: Boston will probably do quite well. I'd say over 6". N shore might get 1" more than the S shore gets. I wouldn't go higher than 2-3" for the NYC area at this point. If we see more N bumps, more like 1-2". I-84 to I-90 is the best zone for this. I get the pessimism but im seeing a stronger confluence in SE Canada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sussexcountyobs Posted Thursday at 11:40 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:40 PM 9 minutes ago, dmillz25 said: I get the pessimism but im seeing a stronger confluence in SE Canada I agree. Alot of pessimism on here. Lots of stuff to track. I see my area getting 12" maybe more over the next 7 days. Should be happy times. We got 1" today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted Thursday at 11:51 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:51 PM Nice to see the Euro beefing up precip/snowfall vs. 12Z. Now the GFS, Euro, CMC and UK are all showing at least 4-8" for our region with the GFS showing 8-12"+ at 18Z. Extremely strong signal for a storm 5 days out. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHELEG Posted Thursday at 11:56 PM Share Posted Thursday at 11:56 PM This post is in the wrong thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted Friday at 12:24 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:24 AM 18z euro was 2-4 to sleet for nyc. It was a bit warmer with the 546 line by nyc but the initial thump was stronger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted Friday at 12:33 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:33 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted Friday at 12:34 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:34 AM Going with 1-2” for the island. Think she trends north. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted Friday at 12:59 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:59 AM 33 minutes ago, Allsnow said: 18z euro was 2-4 to sleet for nyc. It was a bit warmer with the 546 line by nyc but the initial thump was stronger I get that this is NYC subforum, but it would be helpful just to saw a map because not everyone lives in the NYC proper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted Friday at 01:09 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:09 AM 9 minutes ago, allgame830 said: I get that this is NYC subforum, but it would be helpful just to saw a map because not everyone lives in the NYC proper. 4-8 for you assuming it stays where it’s at 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted Friday at 01:13 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:13 AM 3 minutes ago, Allsnow said: 4-8 for you assuming it stays where it’s at Right. I’d like to see a bit of south trend so then the whole region is 4-8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted Friday at 01:13 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:13 AM 1 hour ago, dmillz25 said: I get the pessimism but im seeing a stronger confluence in SE Canada Maybe the Euro AI can save us all. This type of storm isn’t favorable for places along I-80 and south latitude. You get a diamond once in a blue moon like 2/22/08 but most are lousy disappointments while I-90 cleans up. If we can develop confluence or resistance over SE Canada it could be a game changer but otherwise this type of system tries to pump ridging ahead of it and come north especially when it’s a more consolidated system with more access to moisture. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmillz25 Posted Friday at 01:27 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:27 AM 12 minutes ago, jm1220 said: Maybe the Euro AI can save us all. This type of storm isn’t favorable for places along I-80 and south latitude. You get a diamond once in a blue moon like 2/22/08 but most are lousy disappointments while I-90 cleans up. If we can develop confluence or resistance over SE Canada it could be a game changer but otherwise this type of system tries to pump ridging ahead of it and come north especially when it’s a more consolidated system with more access to moisture. I get it and Ive seen it more often than not but with how it’s looking so far its a rather strong confluence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted Friday at 01:37 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:37 AM Euro Ai continues to look very good. I can only see 850’s on Weatherbell. Perhaps @MJO812 can post 540 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted Friday at 01:49 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:49 AM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted Friday at 01:55 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:55 AM 4 minutes ago, Nibor said: Thanks. Sleet line probably makes it to the Driscoll bridge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted Friday at 02:18 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:18 AM 5 hours ago, LibertyBell said: For ice storm warnings I think it's half an inch of ice though not completely sure. There is no separate warning for sleet as the totals are integrated into snowfall totals. 2-3:1 ratio. WWA begins at 1 inch here. 3 inches of snow and 0.1 ice would be WWA (I think) BUT 4 inches of snow + some ice would be a WSW (I've seen WSW for 4-6 inches of snow before.) 4-6 inches is the minimum for WSW from what I've seen. Advisories north of 276/195 are for 3" not 1" (and 2" south of 276/195); but advisories can be posted for less snowfall when freezing rain over 0.01" is expected, as we just saw today. Also, I was once told by a NWS person that the criterion for a county needs to be met for at least half of that county, i.e., a warning for Essex County, for example is where 6" is expected for at least half of the county (which is why so many counties with often sharp gradients are split in half). The maps below are at the linked website. https://www.weather.gov/phi/WinterWx 12 Hour Advisory Snowfall: 12 Hour Snowfall Warning Criteria Ice Storm Warning Crtieria 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted Friday at 02:37 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:37 AM Funny how the HRRR at 48 is a straight up torch and way north this time, meanwhile it was way south and an ice box with today's event. NAM looks close to the Euro/GFS overall 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Friday at 03:09 AM Share Posted Friday at 03:09 AM Icon has 3-5 for NYC and LI. Came south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Friday at 03:16 AM Share Posted Friday at 03:16 AM Chris Cimino on Pix 11 is going with 3-5 for NYC. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted Friday at 03:21 AM Share Posted Friday at 03:21 AM 0Z NAM and ICON, fwiw...still think the NAM map with the "hole" in CNJ is improbable (I get a bigger early thump SW of CNJ and more N of CNJ with the later coastal, but not sure I've ever seen this before). Also, kind of curious if folks in this forum like seeing the zoomed in Pivotal maps or the regional mid-Atlantic or NEUS maps. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now