Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,697
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Scinestro
    Newest Member
    Scinestro
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

My concern is that low trends stronger as we get closer, and thus things get warmer than this run. I mean yeah as is I'd take that in a second! As long as it doesn't get worse and turn into another advisory slop event like the cmc seems to be heading towards.

You and @North Balti Zen should move in together, are you the guy he is moving into in Hamilton?. 

  • Haha 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brooklynwx99 said:

you tell me. rotting west based -NAO, huge 50/50 signal, and vort digging through the Rockies

op almost has my Feb 20 storm...gives us a couple inches of snow but fails to bring it all together until too far off the coast...but the idea is there.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

In case it isn't clear, let me add to this.

1982932964_ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_anom-9923200(1).thumb.png.9f06295ebafa0d6ed617ab42f526325b.png.a9fd7705548763b0f1fe0f5fc40d27cc.png

If someone wouldn't mind shedding some light...isnt the ridge axis too far west? or does the HL block provide enough of a suppressive flow to prevent tracking inland/up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AlexD1990 said:

If someone wouldn't mind shedding some light...isnt the ridge axis too far west? or does the HL block provide enough of a suppressive flow to prevent tracking inland/up?

It's an ensemble mean at 300hr. There are 100 ways to fck that up. Impossible to know if the synoptic setup would be workable. Snow vs. no-snow would be determined by shortwave details masked by the time range and ens averaging. But... still prefer a favorable look than unfavorable... even if almost useless at day 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, T. August said:

Eps run was crazy…. 10-12” mean through 360. Next week’s event was a tiny step back - the center of snowfall shifted north of the M/D line. Still not bad with 4-5” on the 24 hour mean.

This is thru only 300 hrs. Some of those waves must be scoring.

sn10_acc-mean-imp.us_ma (1) (2).png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, AdamHLG said:

January 21, 2016 was a loooooong time ago.  We used to get the big ones every 3 years.  We are at year 9.  At some point one of these needs to deliver 18" plus.  It is time to reset the timer so let's do it already.  I can understand the doom and gloom.  I like snow like the rest of ya, but at some point I want more than 6".    And 6" I might add means it's really 3.5" most of the time by game day.      

Yeah. We have been spoiled in the 2000s. But go back and look how many time from 1970 to 2000 where we got over 15 inches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, AdamHLG said:

January 21, 2016 was a loooooong time ago.  We used to get the big ones every 3 years.  We are at year 9.  At some point one of these needs to deliver 18" plus.  It is time to reset the timer so let's do it already.  I can understand the doom and gloom.  I like snow like the rest of ya, but at some point I want more than 6".    And 6" I might add means it's really 3.5" most of the time by game day.      

We aren't really losing the big storms, just the light and moderate ones. That seems like the real problem. There have been much larger intervals without an 18"+ or 12"+ storm. 

https://www.weather.gov/lwx/winter_storm-pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...