Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,796
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

De-amp wont work though...yea it might get the storm under us but we have a crappy antecedent airmass...the only path to snow is a bomb really.  We need a sub 990 low at our latitude probably for this to work...which is another way of saying its probably not going to work...but the win would be the GGEM but have it bomb out a little faster/further south.  

I am not as worried about suppressed with this wave, there is no mechanism to suppress it other than if the wave just washes out and ends up really weak but then who cares its not a snow for anyone.  

Isn't this far enough out that it could be overall colder and work with  a  weaker wave under us? I'm just thinking about all the changes we've seen inside of 5 days. We're still 8 days out

Edit: for DC and Baltimore you'd need atleast 5 degrees or so on the GFS to make it interesting but it's close for the NW burbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris78 said:

Isn't this far enough out that it could be overall colder and work with  a  weaker wave under us? I'm just thinking about all the changes we've seen inside of 5 days. We're still 8 days out

Could maybe... but a colder airmass will also require a more amplified wave to get to our latitude also, think back to the GFS runs the other day with a colder press from the TPV and a stronger wave giving us 12" lol.  A weaker wave in that paradigm would slide to our south because the boundary is further south and a weak wave wont press the boundary north.  What we want...is to get the thermal boundary south of us....down to like NC border...then have a strong wave as the boundary lifts back north.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Terpeast said:

I know it doesn't feel like it now, but the fact that all the southern areas cashing in at least puts to bed the theory that snowstorm tracks are moving further north and cutting us out. We're still good. If anything, we lost maybe 15-20% of our usual snow climo in the long term. Like Bob Chill, I have a feeling that the next 5-10 winters will be more closer to climo compared to the last 8 years and include at least one big dog, maybe two. 

I think at least some of this is being driven by rapid NPac and NAtl warming, driving +height tendencies there and a transient -height tendency over the continent. It was more confined to the Feb-May timeframe over the northern CONUS in the '10s, primarily in response to the north Pacific, but we may see that expand given how quickly both oceans have warmed.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, csnavywx said:

I think at least some of this is being driven by rapid NPac and NAtl warming, driving +height tendencies there and a transient -height tendency over the continent. It was more confined to the Feb-May timeframe over the northern CONUS in the '10s, primarily in response to the north Pacific, but we may see that expand given how quickly both oceans have warmed.

That does make a lot of sense when I think about it. And when we look at ocean warming in terms of absolute temperature instead of anomalies, it's easy to see how mid-latitude jets over both oceans would become anomalously strong as we've seen in recent years.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Heisy said:


I mean it’s basically now or never for this winter for that period. I’m out on anything before that (like the cmc BS run)

Mitch any euro Ai fun?


.

Same crap except it ends looking like the ensembles with that big bubble of cold heading south. There's a trough out west that in theory if it came east at the right spot would work, but too early to even guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

That does make a lot of sense when I think about it. And when we look at ocean warming in terms of absolute temperature instead of anomalies, it's easy to see how mid-latitude jets over both oceans would become anomalously strong as we've seen in recent years.

With the latitudinal temperature gradient shrinking as the poles warm how are the jets getting stronger?  That is what I can't understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

With the latitudinal temperature gradient shrinking as the poles warm how are the jets getting stronger?  That is what I can't understand.

This is a great question. I think this is more true in the warm seasons as the poles warm much more relatively. But in the cold season, the poles are still cold even if anomalously warm, while extratropical latitudes stay summer-like warm (with all those 580-590+ dm ridges being more commonplace) - it's easy to imagine that the lat temp gradient gets even more compressed in the mid-latitudes. Granted it's not always the case everywhere, but I think it's becoming more common.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...