Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,148
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:31 PM, psuhoffman said:

that storm also had a wave on the arctic boundary that helped draw it up or it would have been way OTS had it focused on the coastal front.  Same with 1996.  If you amplify the wave a bit more along the arctic front that shallow cold south of the arctic boundary can be overcome really easy.  Watch how fast that boundary can rocket NW if you amplify a wave along the boundary just a little.  God knows we've seen that kill us 10000 times, why can't it help us once?  When I look at the H5 track I don't see a suppressed look...usually the heaviest snow ends up close to the base of the H5 track northward and that is coming across out our latitude.  It's rare to see a big snowstorm hit Richmond and Ocean City from a cut off H5 low that tracks through Ohio and PA. 

Expand  

Could certainly see an ideal capture scenario tomorrow, or even Monday with a large region wide MECS with some areas HECS. It would be silly to think the GFS is correct, or any other model for that fact this far out.  We all know we are dealing with big time potential, just need that match to time things correctly for snow lovers.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:36 PM, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Richmond's 20 greatest snowstorm days since 1948, based on the Feb 20 date. Pretty close to the current projected pattern.. 3 troughs Pacific-US-Atlantic around a -NAO, ridge extending into the Hudson Bay.. 

1A-65.gif

1aa-30.gif

That difference off the West coast (ridge vs trough) could be a reason why it will be a flatter storm, vs a more S->N amped one. 

Expand  

Thought we had a +NAO, LOL nevermind I don't want that debate again.  

But... look where the height anomalies in the east are centered on the Richmond storms...down near Atlanta.  They are coming across at our latitude this time.  This fits the DC composite way more than the SE snowstorms one.  If anything...its closer to the NYC composite of all the ones honestly!  

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:49 PM, psuhoffman said:

Thought we had a +NAO, LOL nevermind I don't want that debate again.  

But... look where the height anomalies in the east are centered on the Richmond storms...down near Atlanta.  They are coming across at our latitude this time.  This fits the DC composite way more than the SE snowstorms one.  If anything...its closer to the NYC composite of all the ones honestly!  

Expand  

After looking at composites of top snowstorms, it's close enough... but you can see that we still don't have a New Foundland Low though.. it's 750 miles away.  I just don't think we are going to get a deep/bomb scenario like models are real close to showing. 

Yeah, the H5 is a little north of Richmond. 

  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still haven’t seen anything that would make me feel on edge for the setup. I keep mentioning this….this is a delicate setup with the phasing and eventual interaction between the N/S vortex and the S/S wave that seems fairly robust considering the 5H anomalies. I don’t think some here understand how close some of these close runs were to blowing up into something greater. Yes, there is a chance the phase gets messy and things don’t turn as meridional as we want them to be, but the trend is for a significant storm to be present in-of ORF and the question becomes, “Where does it go from there?” 
 

Someone at this rate is going to get hit really good. The finer details and cohesion of guidance is still tbd. Don’t stress on every single model run. It is terrible for your health. 

  • Like 34
  • Thanks 3
  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 2
  • clap 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:52 PM, MillvilleWx said:

Still haven’t seen anything that would make me feel on edge for the setup. I keep mentioning this….this is a delicate setup with the phasing and eventual interaction between the N/S vortex and the S/S wave that seems fairly robust considering the 5H anomalies. I don’t think some here understand how close some of these close runs were to blowing up into something greater. Yes, there is a chance the phase gets messy and things don’t turn as meridional as we want them to be, but the trend is for a significant storm to be present in-of ORF and the question becomes, “Where does it go from there?” 
 

Someone at this rate is going to get hit really good. The finer details and cohesion of guidance is still tbd. Don’t stress on every single model run. It is terrible for your health. 

Expand  

Finally someone with sanity. Preach. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:50 PM, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

After looking at composites of top snowstorms, it's close enough... but you can see that we still don't have a New Foundland Low though.. it's 750 miles away.  I just don't think we are going to get a deep/bomb scenario like models are real close to showing. 

Yeah, the H5 is a little north of Richmond. 

Expand  

Yes but that's why I said most, not all, but most of the analogs I saw to this storm the bigger issue was a NW track not SE.  The 50/50 low is really far east off the playing field here not a suppressive factor like in the examples I looked at of big snowstorms for Richmond to the Delmarva.  I honestly went looking to see if this fit a close miss to our SE so I could "prepare" myself if that was how this is going to go down...and that isn't what I found.  I found no examples of a storm that Jacked that area with this look.  

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to get destroyed for saying this but the 18z euro was a better run. The kicker was better..the 500mb was better...consolidated and not as stretchy...it was just a hair off in the phasing

1740052800-jpdlWavdyms.png1740052800-tJTu1hicpsg.png

  • Like 17
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:56 PM, Ji said:

I am going to get destroyed for saying this but the 18z euro was a better run. The kicker was better..the 500mb was better...it was just a hair off in the phasing

the ki1740052800-jpdlWavdyms.png1740052800-tJTu1hicpsg.png

Expand  

I'm kinda glad you said it because I just unleashed a tirade and I didn't want it to come off as self serving or that I've lost my mind but I saw the same thing.  

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:51 PM, DarkSharkWX said:

image.thumb.png.4b2342ac749bc267f23f82c635d4e5bd.png
v day 2007, but also some of the higher end 80s storms

Expand  

That analog list kind of backs up my point.  There are a few SE misses...but because they were really weak sauce waves not some 16" snowstorm.  The March 2016 storm for example...yea it missed because the wave was a pathetic pos that didn't give anyone more than 2-4".  

Some of the Spring storms are hard to apply because they happened after the thermals had deteriorated such that there isn't much we can take from what would have happened in a colder regime. 

The rest were either DMV area Jacks or storms that Jacked just north of us.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:56 PM, psuhoffman said:

Yes but that's why I said most, not all, but most of the analogs I saw to this storm the bigger issue was a NW track not SE.  The 50/50 low is really far east off the playing field here not a suppressive factor like in the examples I looked at of big snowstorms for Richmond to the Delmarva.  I honestly went looking to see if this fit a close miss to our SE so I could "prepare" myself if that was how this is going to go down...and that isn't what I found.  I found no examples of a storm that Jacked that area with this look.  

Expand  

Going down with the ship as any respectable captain would. I admire this! Keep sailing high and proud on the S.S. PSU2. Regardless how it transpires you win....you called this 4+ weeks ago. Much respect sir.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:56 PM, Ji said:

I am going to get destroyed for saying this but the 18z euro was a better run. The kicker was better..the 500mb was better...consolidated and not as stretchy...it was just a hair off in the phasing

1740052800-jpdlWavdyms.png1740052800-tJTu1hicpsg.png

Expand  

The only reason you are going to get destroyed is because you post is positive in nature. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2025 at 11:41 PM, psuhoffman said:

Add this to my rant above... apparently the computers agree with me that this pattern doesn't align with a SE miss... again, open to evidence why I'm missing something here.  Really I am 

Expand  

A 'SE miss' isn't the same as places relatively further SE forecast to get somewhat higher amounts of snow, which is what the preponderance of current guidance is depicting. Ofc current guidance may not be completely correct about that and some adjustment NW can still occur. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...