Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,148
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:21 PM, H2O said:

So to explain for the knew people here, we just don't no what will be the true outcome at this point yet.  If we new what was really coming there wouldn't be these shifts in the models.  There is just know way to no.  

Expand  

Too many correct words 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:21 PM, H2O said:

So to explain for the knew people here, we just don't no what will be the true outcome at this point yet.  If we new what was really coming there wouldn't be these shifts in the models.  There is just know way to no.  

Expand  

I see what you did there, fucker.

But seriously...I'm not at all worried about the GFS.  Even if the other models suck, no point in giving up this early in the game.   If we are in a shit spot on Friday...that's when the concern starts

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:21 PM, H2O said:

So to explain for the knew people here, we just don't no what will be the true outcome at this point yet.  If we new what was really coming there wouldn't be these shifts in the models.  There is just know way to no.  

Expand  

This will change 42 more times before Monday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:34 PM, stormtracker said:

It's a shame folks can't control their emotions about simulations we know are likely to change or waiver this far out.  But, here we are.

Expand  

Human Nature... We see the best possible outcome... then we cannot settle for anything less.  Just like a casino... one more spin... I promise.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:17 PM, stormtracker said:

Yeah, I'd rather be north of the precip than south.   GFS has been wobble wobble.   Euro should be fun

Expand  

Yesterday we got a couple Op runs that showed a consolidated storm idea, but that was never the most likely outcome in this type patter, and was probably just a fluke that both major operations spit out the same permutation at the same time.   There are more likely to be multiple waves along the boundary.  The good news is it would take a lot of bad luck to miss all of them.  It would also take a lot of good luck to get the multiple hits it would take to rack up some of the crazy numbers a few runs have shown.  This GFS run was the worse case scenario where we got 2 waves go just south of us and 1 wave go just north of us.  But what are the odds each wave does exactly that from this range...about 0!  

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:29 PM, WEATHER53 said:

Simply too much wavering to CAB

Many can be grateful NHC does not have this issue. 

 

Expand  

Honest question, I am not as familiar with how the NHS does things at these type ranges...what does their projections look like on a tropical system 150 hours out?  How does it compare to what the NWS tries to do regarding a forecast of a synoptic mid latitude system at that range?  Are these two comparable enough to usefully utilize what NHS does to this type of situation?  

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...