Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,798
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Lol? Translate for those of us that don't read 500mb as well :lol: (I'd imagine we down here would like that boundary a tick south?)

That longitudinally extended trop PV beneath a -NAO/-AO is a feature of our big dogs.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Maestrobjwa said:

Lol? Translate for those of us that don't read 500mb as well :lol: (I'd imagine we down here would like that boundary a tick south?)

 

Appears we are closer to the reaches of the SER versus true arctic air. Like I was saying earlier,  I like it much, much colder. 

Hopefully,  the pattern progression, ( MJO, AO, NAO ) will push the boundaries South, the blues. That could open the door to a MECS pattern. 

I was mislead last year by the models, and the years before, I am not getting my hopes up just yet. 

  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frd said:

 

Appears we are closer to the reaches of the SER versus true arctic air. Like I was saying earlier,  I like it much, much colder. 

Hopefully,  the pattern progression, ( MJO, AO, NAO ) will push the boundaries South, the blues. That could open the door to a MECS pattern. 

I was mislead last year by the models, and the years before, I am not getting my hopes up just yet. 

I don't think any of us are banking on a single thing just yet outside of the next 4 or 5 days....at least they shouldn't be. This is still all just potential and windows of opportunity. Maybe a discrete opportunity around the 11th-12th starting to gain traction. But most of us know epic patterns don't always produce. The fact we are seeing the epic pattern evolve at least gives hope and chances. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frd said:

 

Appears we are closer to the reaches of the SER versus true arctic air. Like I was saying earlier,  I like it much, much colder. 

Hopefully,  the pattern progression, ( MJO, AO, NAO ) will push the boundaries South, the blues. That could open the door to a MECS pattern. 

I was mislead last year by the models, and the years before, I am not getting my hopes up just yet. 

I’m good with some SER with that blocking. Yea some waves could rain but I’m tired of dry and fringed and coastal scrapers and congrats Florida. I’ll take my chances on a wet pattern with blocking and the boundary near us.  

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthArlington101 said:

This is a 24 hour mean - that's a "woof woof" big dog signal right there. Timeframe has been locked in for 2-days and keeps looking better.

1739404800-RW3laQTVsZs.png

24hr median is equally nutso

1739383200-40SKy3aD3AM.png

Waiting for someone to ask what the big deal is it is showing a 3-6" storm:arrowhead:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

That's what I was thinking and that's why I asked. I didn't want to be the one to say it! Lol

Not to get too far ahead of ourselves, but next week isn’t looking like that level to me. Potential for that type of thing comes later in February I’d wag. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxUSAF said:

Not to get too far ahead of ourselves, but next week isn’t looking like that level to me. Potential for that type of thing comes later in February I’d wag. 

I agree the result won't be the same, but it is likely the last time we saw a 24hr snowfall mean like that.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxUSAF said:

Not to get too far ahead of ourselves, but next week isn’t looking like that level to me. Potential for that type of thing comes later in February I’d wag. 

Agreed. I think the mean looks like that now due to a high probability of a SECS to maybe MECS level event.  2016 the mean looked that way because a decent number of members were already showing 20” outcomes. Similar look from different scenarios. 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...