Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,148
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

February Medium/Long Range Thread


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 1/31/2025 at 1:39 AM, mitchnick said:

I don't dispute the indexes, but when you look at mean 850 temps, they are cold thru days 10-15. It's not until day 16 when they are warm. The link below starts day 10.

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=epsens_opendata&p=850tw-mean&rh=2025013012&fh=240&r=conus&dpdt=&mc=&pwplus=1

 

Expand  

Part of it could be that the Pacific ridge extends into Alaska.. that is colder at the surface in the US. The other part may actually be model error, as they are maybe coming off a really cold period and running that forward? Save those maps, I bet in verification it will either be warmer, or the H5 will adjust differently to match the colder surface.  It's a pretty strong -PNA/+NAO happening in the long range.. that usually trends warmer to the day of. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 1:42 AM, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Part of it could be that the Pacific ridge extends into Alaska.. that is colder at the surface in the US. The other part may actually be model error, as they are maybe coming off a really cold period and running that forward? Save those maps, I bet in verification it will either be warmer, or the H5 will adjust differently to match the colder surface. 

Expand  

I definitely don't buy the model error idea, but I did consider it before posting. I just can't see how the ensembles are that flawed. An operational at range? Sure, but not an ensemble mean.

I think it coukd be the cold is undercutting the higher heights in the east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 1:47 AM, mitchnick said:

I definitely don't buy the model error idea, but I did consider it before posting. I just can't see how the ensembles are that flawed. An operational at range? Sure, but not an ensemble mean.

I think it coukd be the cold is undercutting the higher heights in the east.

Expand  

I just can't see 500mb High between Aleutian islands and Hawaii at +300dm, and southern Greenland having negative 500mb and it not being above average.. maybe the 500mb pattern will change in future runs, it has been going back and forth a little the last few days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 1:01 AM, CAPE said:

-NAO not always required for snow.

Expand  

Agree. Not always. But heading into February and March. Yeah. We are gonna need it. Or it will be cutter city. Hope I am wrong. 

Edit: I will add. Any precip is good for my garden so bring it. But no -NAO means the SE ridge will dominate. Is what it is. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 1:50 AM, CAPE said:

Improvement in the NA on the 18z GEFS- a little closer to a useful NAO block, thermal boundary pressed further south with below avg temps pushing into the MA for mid month. Still waiting on the Pacific to shift a bit.

1739620800-N01L6IG4B84.png

Expand  

Chuck, I posted that days 10-15 on the Gefs had cold 850's but got warm on day 16. 378hrs that CAPE posted is day 16 and that is warm. But day 16 forecasts, including ensembles, will undoubtedly change one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 2:07 AM, mitchnick said:

Chuck, I posted that days 10-15 on the Gefs had cold 850's but got warm on day 16. 378hrs that CAPE posted is day 16 and that is warm. But day 16 forecasts, including ensembles, will undoubtedly change one way or the other.

Expand  

Ok.. I'm saying the Pacific, if it looks like this with the highest anomaly ridge this far south, is a warm pattern..

1A-52.gif

Maybe in future runs it will show the H further north or over Alaska.. that will get you colder at the surface. I've seen that kind of change happen in the last few days. But beyond Day 10 on 18z GEFS, the Pacific -PNA ridge is pretty far south, and would verify as an above normal temp pattern most likely. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 2:33 AM, Ralph Wiggum said:

Some of our largest late season storms were + nao phases.

Expand  

In Feb and March? Examples? As the longwave pattern starts to change in spring we need a -NAO for bombs. I cannot think of a single example of a big snowstorm on the coastal plain without it. Now out here and up there? Yeah. we can score. Because we hold CAD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 2:13 AM, Stormchaserchuck1 said:
Ok.. I'm saying the Pacific, if it looks like this with the highest anomaly ridge this far south, is a warm pattern..
1A-52.gif
Maybe in future runs it will show the H further north or over Alaska.. that will get you colder at the surface. I've seen that kind of change happen in the last few days. But beyond Day 10 on 18z GEFS, the Pacific -PNA ridge is pretty far south, and would verify as an above normal temp pattern most likely. 

We need to find a way to pinch off another pv lobe.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 2:45 AM, clskinsfan said:

In Feb and March? Examples? As the longwave pattern starts to change in spring we need a -NAO for bombs. I cannot think of a single example of a big snowstorm on the coastal plain without it. Now out here and up there? Yeah. we can score. Because we hold CAD. 

Expand  

March 13, 1993

March 1958

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2025 at 2:45 AM, clskinsfan said:

In Feb and March? Examples? As the longwave pattern starts to change in spring we need a -NAO for bombs. I cannot think of a single example of a big snowstorm on the coastal plain without it. Now out here and up there? Yeah. we can score. Because we hold CAD. 

Expand  

Coastal plain. Yeah. But you didn't mention that in your op

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://x.com/burgwx/status/1885138563982917803

From Tomer 

Regardless of whether a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) event occurs or not, the stubbornly strong stratospheric polar vortex is likely to weaken — both GFS & ECMWF show anomalously strong 100-hPa poleward heat flux:

Gilbe_tWUAA0RIY.jpeg.9587f2f31fe8a4b1b424dd754237d45c.jpeg

 

The TPV tends to remain in SE Canada per Bamm https://x.com/bamwxcom/status/1884994744310178230

We have a continued source region of cold air moving into the middle of Feb and beyond. 

- NAO looks to develop as mentioned, along with a gradual - NAM state.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...