Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,696
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptkalogu
    Newest Member
    Ptkalogu
    Joined

1/19 - The Roulette Wheel 29 Black Storm - OBS


DDweatherman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Ji said:


Yeah, because somebody else said it was much drier

It’s an IMBY sport, you know that better than anyone. Why people pretend they care wtf happens at CAPE’s house when they’re 100 miles west or NW in a completely different climo is funny to me. It’s nice when we all win but it’s tough. It’s hard to get snow these days. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Terpeast said:

Mby station is reporting 47.5 as the high, now 47. Under sunny skies. Full two degrees warmer than other obs, so probably 45 is the real temperature. May need to calibrate my station temp…

After posting this, I’m down to 42

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMFG regarding the gfs qpf panic. 
 

1. stop letting that damn blue/purple color change on the map influence your impression of the run. Yes green to blue is this dramatic change but if the actual qpf went from .53 to .47 that’s noise.  It’s a .05 qpf difference. And that’s what it was for most places on the gfs. 

2. the kuchera snowfall map took an additional hit because it looks like it reduced the ratios a little bit NW of 95. Maybe it has a warm layer it didn’t have. Maybe the VVs in the DGz are less aligned.
 

I haven’t looked and probably won’t because going from a prediction of 7” from .46 qpf to 5.8” from .40 (Westminster) is Fucking NOISE!!!     Both are within the same predicted range and neither would be a bust and if you think that level of change run to run is a big deal you’re in the wrong game. 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 4
  • Haha 3
  • 100% 1
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm always prepared for a bust.  
Just looked at IMBY going back to 04-05, I have 28 events between 2-4".  4.25" and 1.75" dont count
I'd say 
50% met range expectations
20% overperformer
30% underperformer
I dont know what this means.  But I like numbers
 
 
 

Numbers are fun, but the confusion matrix in ML has taught me just how misleading they can be. To me, a 2-4/3-6 event is a success if the grass is covered. Small branches on the ground can stick up, but I only accept it on small quantities. And that’s my version of not knowing what that means.
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

OMFG regarding the gfs qpf panic. 
 

1. stop letting that damn blue/purple color change on the map influence your impression of the run. Yes green to blue is this dramatic change but if the actual qpf went from .53 to .47 that’s noise.  It’s a .05 qpf difference. And that’s what it was for most places on the gfs. 

2. the kuchera snowfall map took an additional hit because it looks like it reduced the ratios a little bit NW of 95. Maybe it has a warm layer it didn’t have. Maybe the VVs in the DGz are less aligned.
 

I haven’t looked and probably won’t because going from a prediction of 7” from .46 qpf to 5.8” from .40 is Fucking NOISE!!!     Both are working the same predicted range and neither would be a bust and if you think that level of change run to run is a big deal you’re in the wrong game. 

Agreed. It is a 3-5 storm. And has always been a 3-5 storm. Moving way to fast for it to be any more than that. Outside of a lolly or slant stick somewhere. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clskinsfan said:

Agreed. It is a 3-5 storm. And has always been a 3-5 storm. Moving way to fast for it to be any more than that. Outside of a lolly somewhere. 

Pretty much always been that way for you guys and 2-4 for us.  People really need to manage their expectations.   Cities ain't getting 6" from this.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clskinsfan said:

Agreed. It is a 3-5 storm. And has always been a 3-5 storm. Moving way to fast for it to be any more than that. Outside of a lolly somewhere. 

I think this is right but I think there is a small band that could get 8” in places but very localized and hard to pin that down.  In general 3-5 probably will characterize the larger Max band well. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Pretty much always been that way for you guys and 2-4 for us.  People really need to manage their expectations.   Cities ain't getting 6" from this.

Yup...not all that long ago this looked like a decent minor or so level event, probably no more than 3-5" anywhere, with a blast of cold on its heels.  Still a lot of fun!  Then we had a few model runs that gave DC and other areas 6"+ and all too many people raised their expectations to that level.  So tearing of hair and gnashing of teeth at every single blip.  I get the concern we've had about temperatures in the metro areas, that's certainly legitimate, but this belief that we're all going to score a warning-level snow (or else it's a failure) is a bit much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...