Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,695
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Wolfpack25
    Newest Member
    Wolfpack25
    Joined

1/22-1/22 Winter Storm Threat


Brick Tamland
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Regan said:

IMG_7024.jpeg

If Fayetteville really gets 1”-3” of snow, that’s going to make me happy. Growing up there and going to school in 34 degree rain while Raleigh kids had snow days really ticked me off. After we moved to North Raleigh, I thought we would be enjoying the snow I saw from afar growing up, but no, we get no snow!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z NAM going north means more sleet and ZR down here on it: now may go ahead and charge my backup power packs in case ZR ends up dominating and is heavy

sleet: would undoubtedly be alltime record IP by far in SE GA: some of this is off the top end of the chart!

IMG_2200.thumb.png.c3b6504f08a6fe57234641005758daf9.png

@dsaur

IMG_2201.png

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, snowinnc said:

If Fayetteville really gets 1”-3” of snow, that’s going to make me happy. Growing up there and going to school in 34 degree rain while Raleigh kids had snow days really ticked me off. After we moved to North Raleigh, I thought we would be enjoying the snow I saw from afar growing up, but no, we get no snow!

Hey, which High School did you go to?  I'm from Hope Mills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, snowinnc said:

Very cool! I went to Fayetteville Academy. I always hear people call it the Academy, but that just sounds so uppity to me.

Ah you're one of those types.  Just Kidding.  I vividly remember the dreaded snowline between Raleigh and Fayetteville from my childhood as well.  When I moved to Greensboro for college I remember reveling in the marginal events that were snow there and rain back home.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WXNewton said:

The trend is real on the NAM here is both of them, might even show Catawba County some love if this continues!!

trend-nam4km-2025012100-f035.snku_acc-imp.us_ma.gif

trend-nam-2025012100-f036.snku_acc-imp.us_ma.gif

Given the way things are going, I would say there is a good chance the trend if not finished either. The current synoptic set, combined with how juiced the LP appears to be already, I would venture to say this is going to trend NW still. 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t know if anyone caught it, but Ethan Clark tweeted minutes ago about the NAM being discontinued tonight, not running anymore tonight, and fair warning. Anyone know what he was talking about? He deleted it shortly after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Wolfpack25 said:

The bad part was they busted horribly in the opposite direction when they got the call wrong in Jan 2000.  Most of the day they were saying 1 -3" if I remember correctly.  We ended up with 24" that night.  

Ahh, my senior year in college. I was taking a Weather and Climate elective, and my professor started tracking the storm on Monday. By Wednesday he thought it could be a significant storm (4-6”). Meanwhile, Greg remained very conservative until Friday.
 

TBH, no one predicted the LP to stall off the coast and the bands of heavy snow just parked over Raleigh. 24” - IT WAS EPIC :thumbsup:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So some years ago I thought the whole notion of "the models will change when the storm gets better sampled over land" was ridiculed into oblivion along with the "18Z models are trash" myth.  I was told that the vast majority of model ingestion is from satellite soundings and that RAOBs were of much reduced importance.  Now I'm hearing this idea being resurrected all over the place by people who seem to know what they are talking bout.  So which is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

So some years ago I thought the whole notion of "the models will change when the storm gets better sampled over land" was ridiculed into oblivion along with the 18Z models are trash" myth.  I was told that the vast majority of model ingestion is from satellite soundings and that RAOBs were of much reduced importance.  Now I'm hearing this idea being resurrected all over the place by people who seem to know what they are talking bout.  So which is it?

…both? It can be both.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So some years ago I thought the whole notion of "the models will change when the storm gets better sampled over land" was ridiculed into oblivion along with the "18Z models are trash" myth.  I was told that the vast majority of model ingestion is from satellite soundings and that RAOBs were of much reduced importance.  Now I'm hearing this idea being resurrected all over the place by people who seem to know what they are talking bout.  So which is it?

All i know is whatever Brick did today to bring back his storm should never be talked about.

giphy.gif


.
  • Like 2
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Regan said:

Don’t know if anyone caught it, but Ethan Clark tweeted minutes ago about the NAM being discontinued tonight, not running anymore tonight, and fair warning. Anyone know what he was talking about? He deleted it shortly after. 

It’s about go time to just look at radar and out the window. Models aren’t needed.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony Sisk said:

It’s about go time to just look at radar and out the window. Models aren’t needed.

He specifically said however, he’s not saying it’s bad… but they won’t be updating it anymore tonight. Then the tweet was gone before I could open it all the way. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s important that current dewpoints be compared to modeled dewpoints:

Example: KATL actual 9PM DP is 0F

What do models show for 9PM there?

0Z 3K NAM: way up at +14F! It’s 14F too high!

IMG_2202.thumb.png.4e079365ca1ca79d580794cc3927880b.png
 

0Z NAM 12K: +10F (10F too high)IMG_2203.thumb.png.3a6a076d3a888d0ca79f3481d7a75421.png

 

18Z Euro: +3F (only 3F too high…so very close)

IMG_2204.thumb.png.4dc3d164033d49ee2409bdfa9f04eef1.png


18Z GFS is -10F (10F too low)IMG_2205.thumb.png.ded69b2c88108122f6c32fb326cd677b.png
 

So, 18Z Euro is by far the closest for KATL. You guys might want to check your locations as dewpoint will be very important in determining how long it will be virga. For here, Euro is spot on making it easily closest to reality like at KATL.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Ah you're one of those types.  Just Kidding.  I vividly remember the dreaded snowline between Raleigh and Fayetteville from my childhood as well.  When I moved to Greensboro for college I remember reveling in the marginal events that were snow there and rain back home.  

That’s why I refuse to call it the Academy, because there are a lot of those types who went to school there. Greensboro is night and day from Fayetteville and Hope Mills, so that must have been a welcomed change for you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s important that current dewpoints be compared to modeled dewpoints:
Example: KATL actual 9PM DP is 0F
What do models show for 9PM there?
0Z 3K NAM: way up at +14F! It’s 14F too high!
IMG_2202.thumb.png.4e079365ca1ca79d580794cc3927880b.png
 
0Z NAM 12K: +10F (10F too high)IMG_2203.thumb.png.3a6a076d3a888d0ca79f3481d7a75421.png
 
18Z Euro: +3F (only 3F too high…so very close)
IMG_2204.thumb.png.4dc3d164033d49ee2409bdfa9f04eef1.png

18Z GFS is -10F (10F too low)IMG_2205.thumb.png.ded69b2c88108122f6c32fb326cd677b.png
 
So, 18Z Euro is by far the closest for KATL. You guys might want to check your locations as dewpoint will be very important in determining how long it will be virga. For here, Euro is spot on making it easily closest to reality like at KATL.

Good observation.


.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

So some years ago I thought the whole notion of "the models will change when the storm gets better sampled over land" was ridiculed into oblivion along with the "18Z models are trash" myth.  I was told that the vast majority of model ingestion is from satellite soundings and that RAOBs were of much reduced importance.  Now I'm hearing this idea being resurrected all over the place by people who seem to know what they are talking bout.  So which is it?

Depends. The impact of additional storm sampling depends on several factors. When a storm traverses a "no-man's land," such as the central regions of Canada, or enters from the Pacific Ocean, additional ground-based observations can significantly improve forecast accuracy. This is particularly true for storms with high potential energy and complex dynamics, where sampling plays a crucial role. This need for enhanced data is why Hurricane Hunters are deployed for both tropical and mid-latitude cyclones. Conversely, when a storm moves through a populated area with an abundance of existing data sources, additional sampling typically has a minimal impact. In essence, computer models rely heavily on data quality—better data inputs lead to better outputs. Therefore, when data is sparse, targeted sampling can greatly enhance forecasts. However, when data coverage is already robust and the storm's behavior is less volatile, additional sampling tends to yield diminishing returns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...