Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,695
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Wolfpack25
    Newest Member
    Wolfpack25
    Joined

Discussion-OBS slippery plowable moderate to high impact snowstorm with many delays near I95 and inland btwn 10AM Sun 1/19-4AM Mon Jan 20. R/S line uncertain near and east of I95 - parts of LI may be limited snowfall of around 1"?


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

Or the more obvious they just F'd up the measurement as always.

They did mess up. It wasn't the banding because LGA didn't really get into that (as opposed to southern Brooklyn or Queens) and they measured 3.6. Pretty ridiculous but more of the same. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dark Star said:

I "think" the NWS was pretty accurate with this one.  There were a lot of varying forecasts from other entities, but none too far off the mark.  Even though my backyard (Garwood NJ - central Union county) received 3.5", I was a little disappointed.  I was hoping for a little bit of an overperformer.  But with the subsidence at the exact time the heavier stuff was supposed to fall, I knew it was not to be.  Even though the radar showed the "screw" zone, I was pessimistically optimistic that it would quickly fill in as some had mentioned.  At least it's cold, and my fire is still burning from last night...

I don't think there was much of a screw zone. The graupel mixing in during the heavier precip for the first few hours may have hurt us a bit.

There were a few isolated amounts over 4" but most of the 5+ was from Hunterdon over through Morris and west Essex on north and west. Generally it was 3 to 4 south of 78 and dropped off once south of us by 20 or 30 miles. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

I don't think there was much of a screw zone. The graupel mixing in during the heavier precip for the first few hours may have hurt us a bit.

There were a few isolated amounts over 4" but most of the 5+ was from Hunterdon over through Morris and west Essex on north and west. Generally it was 3 to 4 south of 78 and dropped off once south of us by 20 or 30 miles. 

On the low end of expectations generally but a nice event. It was clear yesterday AM that other than the places hit by the 700mb/mid-level band it wouldn't live up to the higher expectations since this was a disorganized system that couldn't really drive in the Atlantic moisture. 3.5-4" around this area, can't complain. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MJO812 said:

Yes

I suppose varying waves of heavier precipitation that occurs in almost nearly every storm, rain or snow events, is banding.  However, I think we throw around the term as though one town receives 12" while a neighboring town receives 2".  These would more appropriately be referred to as deformation zones, or areas of intense lifting caused by specific synoptic conditions?  I think this would be an interesting point of discussion on one of the banter topics?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

I don't think there was much of a screw zone. The graupel mixing in during the heavier precip for the first few hours may have hurt us a bit.

There were a few isolated amounts over 4" but most of the 5+ was from Hunterdon over through Morris and west Essex on north and west. Generally it was 3 to 4 south of 78 and dropped off once south of us by 20 or 30 miles. 

I would debate that central Union county NJ was in a bit of a "screw" zone.  Around 3 PM, when the system was forecast to really start intensifying, an area of subsidence occurred and brought the intensity to a very light flizzle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Allsnow said:

3.5 total in Metuchen 

 

Deep winter landscape currently 

 

disappointing total for nyc especially considering the model runs leading up to the event. We very well might break the longest streak without a 4+ snowstorm 

 

 

What's the streak ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

Maybe it's 2 inches now after a whole night of compression and settling. Doubtful at midnight last night when they measured it was 1.6 but it's par for the course.

Do you live in Manhattan? 
 

I’m about a mile from the CPK station and I couldn’t measure 2” last night anywhere.  I would have guessed more like 1.8” but it’s not some criminal under measurement.

Still enough to create a winter wonderland with the cold.

IMG_4283.jpeg.28998934dae5d79c2e0d079f7c31858a.jpegIMG_4284.jpeg.384b838d4d6a48292c07b5ed21da6e37.jpeg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jm1220 said:

On the low end of expectations generally but a nice event. It was clear yesterday AM that other than the places hit by the 700mb/mid-level band it wouldn't live up to the higher expectations since this was a disorganized system that couldn't really drive in the Atlantic moisture. 3.5-4" around this area, can't complain. 

the south shore got about the same, a little under 4"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a drive to Robert Moses and there was snow right down to the beaches. Probably an inch on the sand itself, immediate south shore around 2”. Nice to see the beaches blanketed in snow. 
 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hooralph said:

Do you live in Manhattan? 
 

I’m about a mile from the CPK station and I couldn’t measure 2” last night anywhere.  I would have guessed more like 1.8” but it’s not some criminal under measurement.

Still enough to create a winter wonderland with the cold.

IMG_4283.jpeg.28998934dae5d79c2e0d079f7c31858a.jpegIMG_4284.jpeg.384b838d4d6a48292c07b5ed21da6e37.jpeg

Yup.  I got 1.8 or so on average, they were pretty close.  EWR got a bit more than NYC because they snowed for awhile late afternoon while we were dry slotting as well as LGA/JFK.  In the evening the heavier bands in the 7-9pm window slid just ESE of NYC hitting LGA/JFK.  JFK I think melted more as they took longer to get to 32 than LGA did.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Yup.  I got 1.8 or so on average, they were pretty close.  EWR got a bit more than NYC because they snowed for awhile late afternoon while we were dry slotting as well as LGA/JFK.  In the evening the heavier bands in the 7-9pm window slid just ESE of NYC hitting LGA/JFK.  JFK I think melted more as they took longer to get to 32 than LGA did.

Pathetic. Wonder how many Gulf coast cities will have more for the season than Central Park in 24-48 hours? Not enough for Memphis and Little Rock of course. Nice event generally and we take, but snow wise this is still one of our lamest winters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jm1220 said:

Pathetic. Wonder how many Gulf coast cities will have more for the season than Central Park in 24-48 hours? Not enough for Memphis and Little Rock of course. Nice event generally and we take, but snow wise this is still one of our lamest winters. 

Baton Rouge maybe, not sure anyone else does, I think there will be alot of 2s-3s because of sleet in most other stations.  Montgomery/Augusta/Columbus are ones to watch maybe too.  New Orleans/Charleston/Mobile/Pensacola will mix as will houston

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Yup.  I got 1.8 or so on average, they were pretty close.  EWR got a bit more than NYC because they snowed for awhile late afternoon while we were dry slotting as well as LGA/JFK.  In the evening the heavier bands in the 7-9pm window slid just ESE of NYC hitting LGA/JFK.  JFK I think melted more as they took longer to get to 32 than LGA did.

and 3.5-3.8 were commonplace in southern Queens so JFK might have had a bit of an undermeasurement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...