Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,703
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Climax
    Newest Member
    Climax
    Joined

Discussion-OBS slippery plowable moderate to high impact snowstorm with many delays near I95 and inland btwn 10AM Sun 1/19-4AM Mon Jan 20. R/S line uncertain near and east of I95 - parts of LI may be limited snowfall of around 1"?


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good luck all

Total accums ceiling step back slightly but general 2 to 5 across the board with 6 plus (if it's gonna be anywhere) NWNJ into New England.

Fast moving storm. Banding dependent. Think highest accums will follow where initial axis of snow is setting up now. Possible second maxima S and E of 95 with coastal development. 

Screw area if any could be along and just NW of 95 (still 2 to 3) with squeeze in between initial finger and coastal banding later. Models playing around with this and that's a nowcast but just alerting.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JetsPens87 said:

Good luck all

Total accums ceiling step back slightly but general 2 to 5 across the board with 6 plus (if it's gonna be anywhere) NWNJ into New England.

Fast moving storm. Banding dependent. Think highest accums will follow where initial axis of snow is setting up now. Possible second maxima S and E of 95 with coastal development. 

Screw area if any could be along and just NW of 95 (still 2 to 3) with squeeze in between initial finger and coastal banding later. Models playing around with this and that's a nowcast but just alerting.

Yeah I'm not sure why I see some saying the 95 area will be the jackpot. It's always north and west and then further east with these types of setups.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CentralNJSnowman said:

Problem is on both Safari and Chrome I can see the option to 'Continue on Safari' or 'Continue on Chrome'...but it's always partially covered by an ad, so there's no way to click it (and no obvious way to close the ad).

Let me see what I can do

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you seen the way people drive anymore? Anything is a state of emergency these days. Stopped into a Wegman's ( a store I don't like by the way; overpriced, always low stock ) and the milks shelves were bare; worse, you could see stacks of it in storage but they wouldn't put it out because it was after 9 pm.

I love Wegmans


.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for anyone; whenever I go to this site on my phone, I get a Tapatalk popup that I cannot get rid of, and hence cannot follow the site from a phone. Anyone who has any ideas how to rid myself of this? Showed it to my techie nephew and he was clueless.

I treat myself every November to the half price ($5) ad free version of this app so I can read all of the very stable, very emotionally regulated thoughts of this wretched hive of scum and villainy.


.
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

The main problem I see now is DPs/Ts higher than modeled.  for example LGA 40/30, both NAM/GFS had 36/27 or so.   It may mean any snow from 18-21Z or so won't do a whole lot but not sure it matters a ton as 22-02 was probably when the meaningful rates were coming anyway

Yeah and fwiw the nam seemed to delay the onset slightly so most accumulations are after 4 or 5 anyway so hopefully we don't waste much

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a 6 inch storm around the 287 corridor

 

I think you guys are hung up on last minute model differences

nothing has fundamentally changed. Temperatures around 40 crashing down with precipitation moving in. Urban areas do worse with that situation but they’re still gonna get accumulating snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, the_other_guy said:

I think this is a 6 inch storm around the 287 corridor

 

I think you guys are hung up on last minute model differences

RAPs been super consistent and may be picking up on the thermal gradient in “real Time”. As some have mentioned, temps a little higher than progged so will take longer to lay in some places. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, winterwarlock said:

 

Every model out there has been wrong and late to the party at some point so its not alone

But lets see if its right currently 

We’ll have a better handle on this in about 12 hours and then we could take victory laps or point fingers. Let’s watch the game before we crow over the score

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...