Prismshine Productions Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago FunSent from my SM-S156V using Tapatalk 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said: Fun Sent from my SM-S156V using Tapatalk Yup and you should post that in the February 9 thread 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month That looks like January cold and dry suppression all over again 1 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Just now, Damage In Tolland said: That looks like January cold and dry suppression all over again Their is nothing similar to last month on that posted map 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sey-Mour Snow Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: That looks like January cold and dry suppression all over again 3 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layman Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago On 1/23/2025 at 4:46 PM, ORH_wxman said: Here’s a sample…H5 first set and H85 temp second set 12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month For those of you that can read the tea leaves in these maps, I'm curious how you interpret the quality or cohesiveness of these images from late January and today. Does it imply the modeling was accurate? Did the atmosphere trend in a way that made sense from late January's output to todays? Just curious because the general vibe seems to often be viewing a current map with some level of conviction but over time, it often changes, many times drastically, but does it do so in a sensible way? I'm assuming it does, and you can view it in hindsight and say "Sure, you can absolutely see how that evolution happened". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Layman said: For those of you that can read the tea leaves in these maps, I'm curious how you interpret the quality or cohesiveness of these images from late January and today. Does it imply the modeling was accurate? Did the atmosphere trend in a way that made sense from late January's output to todays? Just curious because the general vibe seems to often be viewing a current map with some level of conviction but over time, it often changes, many times drastically, but does it do so in a sensible way? I'm assuming it does, and you can view it in hindsight and say "Sure, you can absolutely see how that evolution happened". Those were weeklies I posted in January and I’d say they’ve done pretty well. They never fully bought a February torch unless we were talking about some of the progs from maybe prior to January 15th which is getting way out into clown range even for weeklies. Weeklies were def hinting at a coldish gradient pattern which is why I was somewhat optimistic despite February often sucking in La Ninas. Especially once the ensembles were showing the same thing as we got closer. This one looked like it could stay cold enough for a lot of chances. I don’t think the weeklies completely foresaw the huge PV displacement that looks like will occur but they were keeping that PV lurking just N of Hudson Bay 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Those were weeklies I posted in January and I’d say they’ve done pretty well. They never fully bought a February torch unless we were talking about some of the progs from maybe prior to January 15th which is getting way out into clown range even for weeklies. Weeklies were def hinting at a coldish gradient pattern which is why I was somewhat optimistic despite February often sucking in La Ninas. Especially once the ensembles were showing the same thing as we got closer. This one looked like it could stay cold enough for a lot of chances. I don’t think the weeklies completely foresaw the huge PV displacement that looks like will occur but they were keeping that PV lurking just N of Hudson Bay Speaking of PV/SSW, is it still looking like it did yesterday? Cuz that was pretty impressive looking yesterday. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman1 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 50 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month the vortex is splitting going to get cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: That looks like January cold and dry suppression all over again Get a grip of yourself. Lol 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 54 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month It looks like perfect alley for storm to come up the East Coast or across the Ohio valley and tap the cold air to the north 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Speaking of PV/SSW, is it still looking like it did yesterday? Cuz that was pretty impressive looking yesterday. Yes. Stratospheric vortex basically elongated by 120h and fully split by D7…then I posted D10 at the bottom. This might have ramifications for prolonging the blocking into late February and March if we get a full SSW with a clean split 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago cold wedged the high... forecast was 44 but only hit 38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Thanks Will. Wow..quite the look on our side of the pole this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Welcome to the 1970s. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Take another 10F off and maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Just now, dendrite said: Take another 10F off and maybe. that will still be around 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Go Kart Mozart said: Welcome to the 1970s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago I’ll take the over on that on 2/17. That’s almost as cold as 2023 except 2 weeks later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Elongation is nice to look at but it has to produce. The past 4-5 ssw’s failed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 6 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Elongation is nice to look at but it has to produce. The past 4-5 ssw’s failed. Don’t worry. We got an executive order for it today. 2 13 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 13 minutes ago, dendrite said: I’ll take the over on that on 2/17. That’s almost as cold as 2023 except 2 weeks later. BOS at -7 that late would be crazy. BOS -7 at anytime of the winter is Uber rare. Even back during day of yore. So yeah..I’ll take the over too, lol. Logan BOS temps colder than -5: 1943: -14 1957: -12 1980: -7 2004: -7 2016: -9 2023: -10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Still mind boggling they got to -10 in 2013. I remember at like 7p that night it still has a ways to go and I was wondering, but by 9 it started to free fall. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Snowing big flakes again. Thinking another 3” tonight at home, another half a foot for the mountain after last night’s 4”. If we hit on this active pattern, the mountain snowpack is going to get up there. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cut Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 4 minutes ago, powderfreak said: Snowing big flakes again. Thinking another 3” tonight at home, another half a foot for the mountain after last night’s 4”. If we hit on this active pattern, the mountain snowpack is going to get up there. Thinking about coming up for a few days in the first week of March - Im thinking there is a chance of epicocity!!! Tree skiing could be treemendous!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said: that will still be around 0 Other way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 3 minutes ago, cut said: Thinking about coming up for a few days in the first week of March - Im thinking there is a chance of epicocity!!! Tree skiing could be treemendous!!!! Mountain snowpack already a good foot above normal and the snowpack is awesome with no rain in January. If the next 2-3 weeks hit we could be making a run at 100” at the stake. 2019 was the last time over 100” depth but it feels primed to take another step up sitting at ~5.5 feet with a potentially active stretch continuing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layman Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 7 minutes ago, powderfreak said: Mountain snowpack already a good foot above normal and the snowpack is awesome with no rain in January. If the next 2-3 weeks hit we could be making a run at 100” at the stake. 2019 was the last time over 100” depth but it feels primed to take another step up sitting at ~5.5 feet with a potentially active stretch continuing. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisrotary12 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said: Yes. Stratospheric vortex basically elongated by 120h and fully split by D7…then I posted D10 at the bottom. This might have ramifications for prolonging the blocking into late February and March if we get a full SSW with a clean split And I was just starting to daydream about golf and looking at the 2025 tournament signup page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now