Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,683
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    FOLKS
    Newest Member
    FOLKS
    Joined

February 2025 Disco/Obs Thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 1/23/2025 at 4:46 PM, ORH_wxman said:

Here’s a sample…H5 first set and H85 temp second set

 

IMG_1969.png

IMG_1970.png

IMG_1971.png

IMG_1972.png

IMG_1973.png

IMG_1974.png

 

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

What a crazy arctic configuration by mid month 

image.png.170f46285123bc89a3bf22087641626c.png

 

For those of you that can read the tea leaves in these maps, I'm curious how you interpret the quality or cohesiveness of these images from late January and today.  Does it imply the modeling was accurate?  Did the atmosphere trend in a way that made sense from late January's output to todays?  Just curious because the general vibe seems to often be viewing a current map with some level of conviction but over time, it often changes, many times drastically, but does it do so in a sensible way?  I'm assuming it does, and you can view it in hindsight and say "Sure, you can absolutely see how that evolution happened".   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Layman said:

 

 

For those of you that can read the tea leaves in these maps, I'm curious how you interpret the quality or cohesiveness of these images from late January and today.  Does it imply the modeling was accurate?  Did the atmosphere trend in a way that made sense from late January's output to todays?  Just curious because the general vibe seems to often be viewing a current map with some level of conviction but over time, it often changes, many times drastically, but does it do so in a sensible way?  I'm assuming it does, and you can view it in hindsight and say "Sure, you can absolutely see how that evolution happened".   

Those were weeklies I posted in January and I’d say they’ve done pretty well. They never fully bought a February torch unless we were talking about some of the progs from maybe prior to January 15th which is getting way out into clown range even for weeklies. Weeklies were def hinting at a coldish gradient pattern which is why I was somewhat optimistic despite February often sucking in La Ninas. Especially once the ensembles were showing the same thing as we got closer. This one looked like it could stay cold enough for a lot of chances.
 

I don’t think the weeklies completely foresaw the huge PV displacement that looks like will occur but they were keeping that PV lurking just N of Hudson Bay 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Those were weeklies I posted in January and I’d say they’ve done pretty well. They never fully bought a February torch unless we were talking about some of the progs from maybe prior to January 15th which is getting way out into clown range even for weeklies. Weeklies were def hinting at a coldish gradient pattern which is why I was somewhat optimistic despite February often sucking in La Ninas. Especially once the ensembles were showing the same thing as we got closer. This one looked like it could stay cold enough for a lot of chances.
 

I don’t think the weeklies completely foresaw the huge PV displacement that looks like will occur but they were keeping that PV lurking just N of Hudson Bay 

Speaking of PV/SSW, is it still looking like it did yesterday?  Cuz that was pretty impressive looking yesterday. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Speaking of PV/SSW, is it still looking like it did yesterday?  Cuz that was pretty impressive looking yesterday. 

Yes. Stratospheric vortex basically elongated by 120h and fully split by D7…then I posted D10 at the bottom. This might have ramifications for prolonging the blocking into late February and March  if we get a full SSW with a clean split  

image.thumb.png.b0195654898eb1a001ecc2f1c23e6f2a.png

 

image.thumb.png.b2d4cdb4083bed0b0174a381560d61f9.png
 

image.thumb.png.cddc67f028042c1ed7b20fbba06d317c.png

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I’ll take the over on that on 2/17. That’s almost as cold as 2023 except 2 weeks later.

BOS at -7 that late would be crazy. BOS -7 at anytime of the winter is Uber rare. Even back during day of yore. So yeah..I’ll take the over too, lol. 
 

Logan BOS temps colder than -5:

1943: -14

1957: -12

1980: -7

2004: -7

2016: -9

2023: -10

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Snowing big flakes again.

Thinking another 3” tonight at home, another half a foot for the mountain after last night’s 4”.

If we hit on this active pattern, the mountain snowpack is going to get up there.

IMG_2539.thumb.png.f640214bed14dbe2d54077bf908079e1.png

Thinking about coming up for a few days in the first week of March - Im thinking there is a chance of epicocity!!!  Tree skiing could be treemendous!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cut said:

Thinking about coming up for a few days in the first week of March - Im thinking there is a chance of epicocity!!!  Tree skiing could be treemendous!!!!

Mountain snowpack already a good foot above normal and the snowpack is awesome with no rain in January.  If the next 2-3 weeks hit we could be making a run at 100” at the stake.  2019 was the last time over 100” depth but it feels primed to take another step up sitting at ~5.5 feet with a potentially active stretch continuing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Mountain snowpack already a good foot above normal and the snowpack is awesome with no rain in January.  If the next 2-3 weeks hit we could be making a run at 100” at the stake.  2019 was the last time over 100” depth but it feels primed to take another step up sitting at ~5.5 feet with a potentially active stretch continuing.

image.png.ee9aaa49596b7235a773494aee5e0561.png

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yes. Stratospheric vortex basically elongated by 120h and fully split by D7…then I posted D10 at the bottom. This might have ramifications for prolonging the blocking into late February and March  if we get a full SSW with a clean split  

image.thumb.png.b0195654898eb1a001ecc2f1c23e6f2a.png

 

image.thumb.png.b2d4cdb4083bed0b0174a381560d61f9.png
 

image.thumb.png.cddc67f028042c1ed7b20fbba06d317c.png

 

And I was just starting to daydream about golf and looking at the 2025 tournament signup page. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...