Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,726
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kraken613
    Newest Member
    kraken613
    Joined

February 2025 Disco/Obs Thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Not to pour acid into a paper cut but I wonder if this is what our winters will be for the rest of our lives... and/or getting worse.   Like it's not going back to 1995, ever again.  This year could be a "2015" modulated by/with a "2023" temperature burst...

I'm just basing that posit on persistent "era relative behavior" and suspecting gradient is a problem -how.

Regardless of any antecedent teleconditioning correlation - the correlations are all failing.  ENSO disruptions, to -EPO only causing compression that is a base-line negative interference fuckitude...  We keep playing this game that it's just circumstantial and we'll have to wait.

What exactly would we be waiting for? 

- no, ... that completely elides that what one is waiting for may not be capable of manifesting.  It has to be at least considered to be rarefying to a low likeliness of return. I just keep coming back to this notion, as I grapple with what is impossible to ignore at this point ... it seems that we've already moved the climate needle to where we are trading off negative interference, for snow profiles at our latitude.    Like yeah ...it's cold enough, but we can't seem to get there without the compression.   In a Lego constructive, simple sense of it... if we warm the world, then try to cool off the polar domain, that means higher gradient everywhere.  Ding ding ding...  sometimes the simple explanation is the best suitable one to explain things.  

 

I’ve had that same feeling. We won’t know when we experience the last of something. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rain up to the chickens on euro but the primary did squash some that run…the other main difference is we had no high north of maine this time to spring a secondary reflection. It’s just one low that basically track over our heads. Still a higher end threat though. Wouldn’t take much to push that into a major snowstorm. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Rain up to the chickens on euro but the primary did squash some that run…the other main difference is we had no high north of maine this time to spring a secondary reflection. It’s just one low that basically track over our heads. Still a higher end threat though. Wouldn’t take much to push that into a major snowstorm. 

Next weekend is going to be all over the place, especially if we are counting on a well timed high pressure and as well as what ever happens the middle of next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spanks45 said:

Next weekend is going to be all over the place, especially if we are counting on a well timed high pressure and as well as what ever happens the middle of next week.

The key for next weekend aloft is for the PV to be pressed and stay ahead of the main shortwave coming out of the west. 

 

 

IMG_2037.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Here’s GFS. Look how much further southeast it is with PV in eastern Canada…fully east of Hudson’s bay  

image.png.f3b03039e0ed5c1a74b58b79bc808373.png

 

Seems to be a subtle difference and with 140ish hrs to go, plenty of time to go either way....Euro has definitely been amp happy in the long range recently, so who knows.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Not to pour acid into a paper cut but I wonder if this is what our winters will be for the rest of our lives... and/or getting worse.   Like it's not going back to 1995, ever again.  This year could be a "2015" modulated by/with a "2023" temperature burst...

I'm just basing that posit on persistent "era relative behavior" and suspecting gradient is a problem -how.

Regardless of any antecedent teleconditioning correlation - the correlations are all failing.  ENSO disruptions, to -EPO only causing compression that is a base-line negative interference fuckitude...  We keep playing this game that it's just circumstantial and we'll have to wait.

What exactly would we be waiting for? 

- no, ... that completely elides that what one is waiting for may not be capable of manifesting.  It has to be at least considered to be rarefying to a low likeliness of return. I just keep coming back to this notion, as I grapple with what is impossible to ignore at this point ... it seems that we've already moved the climate needle to where we are trading off negative interference, for snow profiles at our latitude.    Like yeah ...it's cold enough, but we can't seem to get there without the compression.   In a Lego constructive, simple sense of it... if we warm the world, then try to cool off the polar domain, that means higher gradient everywhere.  Ding ding ding...  sometimes the simple explanation is the best suitable one to explain things.  

 

Either that, or we're simply still regressing after a robust couple of decades. This becomes much more viable if we're still doing this in about 7-8 years. 

Here is a crazy, fantastic notion right out of a sci fi novel....perhaps exotic storms and seasons don't grow on trees??

Imagine?

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Either that, or we're simply still regressing after a robust couple of decades. This becomes much more viable if we're still doing this in about 7-8 years. 

Here is a crazy, fantastic notion right out of a sci fi novel....perhaps exotic storms and seasons don't grow on trees??

Imagine?

ehh  there's something else obviously different - sorry   <_<     Sometimes a when quacks like a duck, it's a duck. I guess we'll find.   

Above will turn out true ...and summarily everyone thinks how 'no one saw it coming'   lol   

  • Confused 2
  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

ehh  there's something else obviously different - sorry   <_<     Sometimes a when quacks like a duck, it's a duck. I guess we'll find.   

Above will turn out true ...and summarily everyone thinks how 'no one saw it coming'   lol   

What would that be? My mean snowfall since 2015 is right about at 60", and we just saw record snowfall all throughout the south. I think you need to accept reality even when it doesn't fit neatly within your agenda.

Sorry.

CC is real, but zealots like yourself are prone to fantastic over attribution. 

Fact, not opinion.

  • Thanks 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

Rain up to the chickens on euro but the primary did squash some that run…the other main difference is we had no high north of maine this time to spring a secondary reflection. It’s just one low that basically track over our heads. Still a higher end threat though. Wouldn’t take much to push that into a major snowstorm. 

EPS mean is under 990 mb E of Boston, having moved from the Bite along or just S of LI, but ut the 850 mb is too warm. 

Altho I'm not sure that's abundantly important for the resolution/mean at 168+ hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Spread all much better than op . Toss op 

eujVXOZ.jpeg

That’s kind of late in the system. Back that up 2 frames. Huge spread on EPS. But the mean is like 7” for the pike region despite plenty of members looking like the OP run. But there’s also plenty of members that have huge hits well into double digits. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

EPS mean is under 990 mb E of Boston, having moved from the Bite along or just S of LI, but ut the 850 mb is too warm. 

Altho I'm not sure that's abundantly important for the resolution/mean at 168+ hours.

Not very coherent on the clustering ……looks more like Buck shot…but yeah, we’re still a week out. 

image.thumb.png.1745ccd656c105138260904d8797551c.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

That’s kind of late in the system. Back that up 2 frames. Huge spread on EPS. But the mean is like 7” for the pike region despite plenty of members looking like the OP run. But there’s also plenty of members that have huge hits well into double digits. 

A betting man would hedge it ends up like this one last night or a change to ice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

What would that be? My mean snowfall since 2015 is right about at 60", and we just saw record snowfall all throughout the south. I think you need to accept reality even when it doesn't fit neatly within your agenda.

Sorry.

CC is real, but zealots like yourself are prone to fantastic over attribution. 

Fact, not opinion.

That ^ bold is fact, eh ?  LOL  

Like I said in the missive, ".. It has to be at least considered to be rarefying to a low likeliness of return..."    

Not sure objective consideration needs to be interpreted as zealot.  

You say or admit that CC is real, but then if someone offers consequence as mere hypothesis to explain observation ( hint hint, the scientific approach ) you get pissy and condescending -

okay

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...