Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,724
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kraken613
    Newest Member
    kraken613
    Joined

February 2025 Disco/Obs Thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

What a friek Scott has turned into…guy is completely shot.  Ya hate to see it.  Crying about something a week out.  Please take a break.  Not every threat is gonna hit…didn’t he tell us that.  What a melt…

Usually when Scott melts its a good sign for something big coming.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I def see Scotts concern south and east of 84 over the next 2 weeks.. But we have 2 cold storms before that (hopefully Tuesday PM for SNE). And then hopefully the blocking and cold press can do work and push enough to keep all of us from seeing rain later next week and beyond.  As long as we don't cut to buffalo and rain its all good.  Lets just keep the pack that we gain starting tomorrow.  I think this is at least a very good stretch of snow, will it be epic? We just don't know yet, but the opportunity is there, GEFS 6z, and EPS 00z still look amazing, the op runs will fluctuate until we get closer. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

I def see Scotts concern south and east of 84 over the next 2 weeks.. But we have 2 cold storms before that (hopefully Tuesday PM for SNE). And then hopefully the blocking and cold press can do work and push enough to keep all of us from seeing rain later next week and beyond.  As long as we don't cut to buffalo and rain its all good.  Lets just keep the pack that we gain starting tomorrow.  I think this is at least a very good stretch of snow, will it be epic? We just don't know yet, but the opportunity is there, GEFS 6z, and EPS 00z still look amazing, the op runs will fluctuate until we get closer. 

That’s all it is a concern. I didn’t cancel anything, but people need to keep things in check.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

I def see Scotts concern south and east of 84 over the next 2 weeks.. But we have 2 cold storms before that (hopefully Tuesday PM for SNE). And then hopefully the blocking and cold press can do work and push enough to keep all of us from seeing rain later next week and beyond.  As long as we don't cut to buffalo and rain it’s all good.  Let’s just keep the pack that we gain starting tomorrow.  I think this is at least a very good stretch of snow, will it be epic? We just don't know yet, but the opportunity is there.. 

The Thursday system has a pretty good high anchored N of CAR so even if that tries to amp, I’d think decent front ender. The 00z OP euro was on the northwest edge of the ensemble envelope…it’s possible it’s correct but there’s plenty of huge hits in the ensemble suite. This type of pattern will produce the threat of some messier systems. Even during the barrage of 1994 we had two…MLK weekend storm was messy and the 1/28 storm was basically a full cutter. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The Thursday system has a pretty good high anchored N of CAR so even if that tries to amp, I’d think decent front ender. The 00z OP euro was on the northwest edge of the ensemble envelope…it’s possible it’s correct but there’s plenty of huge hits in the ensemble suite. This type of pattern will produce the threat of some messier systems. Even during the barrage of 1994 we had two…MLK weekend storm was messy and the 1/28 storm was basically a full cutter. 

GEFS, EPS, SKYNET look amazing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoastalWx said:

Can already see the cutters trying on the euro. 

 

EPS too. Oh well.

I suspect that is in error...  I think we're talking about the bigger event the 15-17th?  

The numerical derivatives don't correlate very well to early left turning.  In fact ... they are opposite.   That source implies an east, and by virtue of that also means somewhat south, correction in time.   

That may not be the case ...it's not a declaration. I wouldn't be surprised.    

Beyond that, I also think the 13th is a "trap game" storm.   It may become that there is a bigger dawg on the 16 or so that's too tempting to captivate the audience, while the 13th sneaks in as a player.  Before the big dawg's in Jan and Feb 1978 there was a 1000 mb low up the coast with 19" at Logan in 24 hours. This is interesting because it is more of a Miller A origin, as is suggested coherently in all 3 ens systems... By virtue of that, it will have access to a better moisture source - that is reflected already in the 24-hrly QPF means > .75" even from 160 hour lead - that's a pretty wet signal to be moving headlong into an antecedent air mass that still gripped by 1030 mb polar-arctic PP, N of our latitude when that one arrives. 13th becomes a candidate for over-achieving relative to climo low strength if these synoptics formulate in kind.   This paragraph could be the thread opener on that imho - but in deference to the weekend gig ... 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The Thursday system has a pretty good high anchored N of CAR so even if that tries to amp, I’d think decent front ender. The 00z OP euro was on the northwest edge of the ensemble envelope…it’s possible it’s correct but there’s plenty of huge hits in the ensemble suite. This type of pattern will produce the threat of some messier systems. Even during the barrage of 1994 we had two…MLK weekend storm was messy and the 1/28 storm was basically a full cutter. 

Reminder when yesterday was modeled by the Euro to be 65-70 as late as last weekend ? Instead it snowed and iced 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I suspect that is in error...  I think we're talking about the bigger event the 15-17th?  

The numerical derivatives don't correlate very well to early left turning.  In fact ... they are opposite.   That source implies an east, and by virtue of that also means somewhat south, correction in time.   

That may not be the case ...it's not a declaration. I wouldn't be surprised.    

Beyond that, I also think the 13th is a "trap game" storm.   It may become that there is a bigger dawg on the 16 or so that's too tempting to captivate the audience, while the 13th sneaks in as a player.  Before the big dawg's in Jan and Feb 1978 there was a 1000 mb low up the coast with 19" at Logan in 24 hours. This is interesting because it is more of a Miller A origin, as is suggested coherently in all 3 ens systems... By virtue of that, it will have access to a better moisture source - that is reflected already in the 24-hrly QPF means > .75" even from 160 hour lead - that's a pretty wet. The antecedent air mass is still gripped by 1030 mb polar-arctic PP, N of our latitude when that one arrives, 13th becomes a candidate for over-achieving relative to climo low strength.   This paragraph could be the thread opener on that imho - but in deference to the weekend gig ... 

some of these short waves are digging pretty far down and then bouncing north due to the southeast ridge. I can totally see some of those depictions. Are they correct? I don’t know, but completely realistic imo. We’ve had all types of scenarios last few years when everyone was claiming this or that will save us only to find a way for these waves to dig into the plains and create messy scenarios. 
 

Also, these air masses are not arctic. Low 30s for highs with sun? Only thing saving us is high pressure trying to anchor in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

I am the caution king for a reason. Let’s hope it’s not as messy. 

I’ve noticed something. When people get excited or what you may think is too much weenie, you like to temper that excitement and make things non hype and more mundane . It’s a pattern . It’s just what you do . Which is fine since we understand it 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The Thursday system has a pretty good high anchored N of CAR so even if that tries to amp, I’d think decent front ender. The 00z OP euro was on the northwest edge of the ensemble envelope…it’s possible it’s correct but there’s plenty of huge hits in the ensemble suite. This type of pattern will produce the threat of some messier systems. Even during the barrage of 1994 we had two…MLK weekend storm was messy and the 1/28 storm was basically a full cutter. 

In my view, you want a messy system or two thrown in to make the pack meatier. Also increases the chances you can walk on the pack instead of sinking into it every time you go outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

I’ve noticed something. When people get excited or what you may think is too much weenie, you like to temper that excitement and make things non hype and more mundane . It’s a pattern . It’s just what you do . Which is fine since we understand it 

This isn’t Kevin behavior. Just interpreting guidance. Why can’t someone raise concern? It’s not like I’m torch tiger pointing out a trough in the plains on the 384 hr gfs op. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

3 years of melts have led to an accumulation of 40” of snow during that time. Just saying. 

Hey listen, I had my melt about 2 weeks ago. I get what you're saying, and there was always that possibility that things could go the other way. There's no way to know for sure. But there's still a lot of positive signs for snow and storms. What form they take, yes that might be up in the air a bit. Point is, you went from being very optimistic to totally pessimistic. Just makes you look like you're losing your mind. 

Take a break like I did for a day. It helped

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

This isn’t Kevin behavior. Just interpreting guidance. Why can’t someone raise concern? It’s not like I’m torch tiger pointing out a trough in the plains on the 384 hr gfs op. 

You can certainly point out whatever you’d like. I’m not saying that . Just making an observation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...