Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,694
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptkalogu
    Newest Member
    Ptkalogu
    Joined

1/19 - The Weekend Roulette Wheel Thing


DDweatherman
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

So they have made them human. :yikes:

so I use it to help me write code, since that really isnt my background and it is helpful to get started in a lot of cases.  And it is amazing how well it can generate code, if you feed it the correct prompts.  But a lot of time it simply doesn't know the next step and instead of telling the user, it guesses and if you are not careful, you have at best buggy code, at worst malicious code.  AI Models also seem to be overly affirmative.  For instance if you ask it: 

"Is is true that..(some condition)"

and then immediately ask it

"Is it false that (the same condition)"

a lot of times it will answer in the affirmative in both cases .. but the human knows that it something cannot be true and false at the same time.

WRT AI weather models.. I do think that there is a huge opportunity to get better output over time.  I am not 100% sure how the AI weather model works, but doing some research it looks like the model calculates an outcome and then it looks back in to it training set to see whether or not it is realistic based on historical verification data.  Then it adjust for that and provides a "better" outcome and keeps calculating. If you think about it.. the AI model is doing what the trained meteorologist should be doing, just on a micro level.  The mets in here can look at a forecast on the GFS and quickly call bs based on things like climo, historical verifications, bias, etc... as the ai models get  more training date, their output should automatically get better.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Ah, ok.  Not great, but not dire.  I thought it was some sudden change.

It's last 2 runs were pretty identical, before that it was even more amplified and further NW, even had me getting mostly rain.  It's trending slightly SE overall but its been and continues to be the most amplified and so the most NW of all guidance.  It's likely overdone...the most extreme solution in either direction rarely "wins" 100%.  It's almost always a compromise solution that wins...the questions is how much of a compromise... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

It's last 2 runs were pretty identical, before that it was even more amplified and further NW, even had me getting mostly rain.  It's trending slightly SE overall but its been and continues to be the most amplified and so the most NW of all guidance.  It's likely overdone...the most extreme solution in either direction rarely "wins" 100%.  It's almost always a compromise solution that wins...the questions is how much of a compromise... 

interesting to see the normally “under amped” UKMET be mostly in the Canadians camp. It’s been fairly consistent as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DDweatherman said:

interesting to see the normally “under amped” UKMET be mostly in the Canadians camp. It’s been fairly consistent as well. 

I wouldn't say the UKMET is always under amped...it can sometimes be really amplified...hence the "crazy uncle" nickname it had for a while.  Still I think the final solution is likely somewhere in between the two extreme camps (GGEM/GFS) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

I wouldn't say the UKMET is always under amped...it can sometimes be really amplified...hence the "crazy uncle" nickname it had for a while.  Still I think the final solution is likely somewhere in between the two extreme camps (GGEM/GFS) 

That middle ground solution is ICON/Euro I’d say as the blend currently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

I wouldn't say the UKMET is always under amped...it can sometimes be really amplified...hence the "crazy uncle" nickname it had for a while.  Still I think the final solution is likely somewhere in between the two extreme camps (GGEM/GFS) 

Your lips to God's ears....and hopefully my backyard :D

  • Like 4
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

The thing I like most out of the last cycle or two of runs is that across guidance there seems to be an expanding of the precipitation field.  A larger "win" zone.  

I think it’s an earlier development, and maturity of the low along the arctic front that helps. Before, it was a “pop up” hit and run on a lot of the models.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DDweatherman said:

That middle ground solution is ICON/Euro I’d say as the blend currently. 

I hope so, because without any blocking Id much rather be on the NW side of the qpf shield going into gametime than the SE.  If all guidance actually looked like the RGEM I would be worried we end up a bit too warm even up here.  My hope is that come Saturday the guidance looks like the last run of the euro did or something close to it.  Maybe slightly more amplified would be nice.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

I hope so, because without any blocking Id much rather be on the NW side of the qpf shield going into gametime than the SE.  If all guidance actually looked like the RGEM I would be worried we end up a bit too warm even up here.  My hope is that come Saturday the guidance looks like the last run of the euro did or something close to it.  Maybe slightly more amplified would be nice.  

Don’t disagree. This is one of those that has a game time north trend on it a higher % of the time than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...