Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,694
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptkalogu
    Newest Member
    Ptkalogu
    Joined

1/19 - The Weekend Roulette Wheel Thing


DDweatherman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bottom line is almost every model gives the area some snow Sunday. Details to be fine tuned as always. Models are not backing off or showing any moderationon the Arctic cold as we get closer and in fact it keeps getting stronger and colder. Then a chance at a significant event towards the end of next week. This could be and I emphasize could be a top 5 winter week of all time!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be just as bad as the Gfs.
 

Euro Ai is my go to model under 5 days and idc what anyone says. This thing is a beast. I know this event hasn’t happened yet, but all winter this thing locks in at this range. It’ll have minor ticks each run, but I haven’t seen it pull a full on big swing like the GFS or euro just did all winter.


.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CAPE said:

I get what you are saying, but there are always multiple variables at play that factor in to the ultimate outcome. In this case it is more where the thermal boundary is located vs a more amped wave. The flow is relatively flat and west to east, and the vorticity is stretched out accordingly, underneath an upper level jet streak. Compare the vorticity on the 6z GFS and 6z Euro runs. No real dig in either case, and a subtle difference in the boundary location. For all practical purposes their outcomes are the same. In this situation the heavier snow(such that it will be) could be biased a bit NW or SE.

 

I’m kinda tossing the GFS boundary location. Because all other guidance is all pretty close on that and the difference between the further NW Ggem and uk and southeast euro was simply the amplitude of the SW.  if that’s true (and it might not be I’m wrong plenty) then we have a range of permutations that is between a 4-8” snow with a NW of 95 track to a 1-3” SE of 95 track. 
 

If I’m wrong about the location of the boundary then it opens the door to a bigger snow SE, but I tossed that solution because it’s only been on the gfs and that models been a mess lately.  Across all other guidance we’ve had a more consistent range of outcomes. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I’m kinda tossing the GFS boundary location. Because all other guidance is all pretty close on that and the difference between the further NW Ggem and uk and southeast euro was simply the amplitude of the SW.  if that’s true (and it might not be I’m wrong plenty) then we have a range of permutations that is between a 4-8” snow with a NW of 95 track to a 1-3” SE of 95 track. 
 

If I’m wrong about the location of the boundary then it opens the door to a bigger snow SE, but I tossed that solution because it’s only been on the gfs and that models been a mess lately.  Across all other guidance we’ve had a more consistent range of outcomes. 

Kinda splitting hairs here. The 6z Euro has 4-6 along I-95, and a little less NW and SE.

  • Like 2
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Kinda splitting hairs here. The 6z Euro has 4-6 along I-95, and a little less NW and SE.

It had a run that was about 3-6” along or near 95 yesterday too. I think that’s likely close to their max solution.  If the wave ends up more amplified and the track shifts NW I think it has 8” potential for places further NW like MRG, HGR, MDT. Of course that’s dependent on them getting into the max band. I do think in general the further NW the snow ends up the more likely it is to be heavier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

It had a run that was about 3-6” along or near 95 yesterday too. I think that’s likely close to their max solution.  If the wave ends up more amplified and the track shifts NW I think it has 8” potential for places further NW like MRG, HGR, MDT. Of course that’s dependent on them getting into the max band. I do think in general the further NW the snow ends up the more likely it is to be heavier. 

Get me .3” QPF and I’ll feel pretty good about 4-5” in this one

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm telling you guys, when the AI is this locked in, everyone should take note. It's not a true dynamical model that can sway with regular perturbations like a ECMWF/GFS/(Insert Model here), it's basically a really well programmed analog with a historical dataset that it references on each run. When it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck....

  • Like 24
  • 100% 2
  • saywhat? 2
  • yes 1
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...