Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,702
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Szaquli
    Newest Member
    Szaquli
    Joined

1/19 - The Weekend Roulette Wheel Thing


DDweatherman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

I dunno, I still see like 15+ that give me accumulating snow.  I don't have access to the members though to toggle with 6z but I'll roll the dice with that. 

Snowfall mean seems a bit south of 6z, but would need to compare the individual members to see if that is skewed by a few big hits/misses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

You couldn't wait to pull that one out, could you? :lol:

But yeah...it's annoying, but If the Euro holds, I dunno man

Why is there still this much difference 48 and less hours out form a storm is getting frustrating. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hstorm said:

Snowfall mean seems a bit south of 6z, but would need to compare the individual members to see if that is skewed by a few big hits/misses.

You can see the 3” probs shrank some south and Increased north. 

IMG_9029.jpeg

IMG_9028.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TSSN+ said:

Why is there still this much difference 48 and less hours out form a storm is getting frustrating. 

 

6 minutes ago, Ji said:

i cant see the euro going from snow to rain so close to the storm man...i mean it starts in 36 hours or so right?

It really is such a weird situation we're in.   Especially this close in.  I mean, there are usually some model differences, but this scattershot is wild.   Models running the gamut, from damn near nothing, to warning criteria, to a rainstorm all the way up to Mitch and co. within 48 hours of a storm.  Crazy times.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, yoda said:

Don't bother with the 12z CMC unless you are in W MD

FYI, once we are inside 72 hours there is really no need to wait for the GGEM, the RGEM is just a higher resolution version of the GGEM.  It's not like the NAM and GFS where they can be crazy different.  The GGEM and RGEM are never that different just the RGEM will show more details...and frankly if they were different you're supposed to use the RGEM once inside range...so once close enough the GGEM is irrelevant.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

FYI, once we are inside 72 hours there is really no need to wait for the GGEM, the RGEM is just a higher resolution version of the GGEM.  It's not like the NAM and GFS where they can be crazy different.  The GGEM and RGEM are never that different just the RGEM will show more details...and frankly if they were different you're supposed to use the RGEM once inside range...so once close enough the GGEM is irrelevant.  

I will say, the UK hasn't been awful lately, though it has had a tendency to be underamped rather than its old days of being over. The trend from 12z yday to 0z to 12z today is a major drying & de-amp. Don't know how much I care, but it is noticeable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Interstate said:

@psuhoffmanwould take that run.

 

46 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Even he is right on the gradient. 

I am right on the 6" line but it has 12" like 30 miles NW of me...and you want to be on the NW side of the heavy snow in these type setups NOT the SE edge so no.  Plus...if I can have my choice I want the whole area to get a hit...it's a little less fun when I am getting snow up here and the rest of the forum is rain because I know everyone else in here is miserable and I'm not going to come in here and be all "look at me I got a ton of snow" when everyone else is sad they had a snowstorm slip away.  Give me the GFS win for all please.  

9 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

I will say, the UK hasn't been awful lately, though it has had a tendency to be underamped rather than its old days of being over. The trend from 12z yday to 0z to 12z today is a major drying & de-amp. Don't know how much I care, but it is noticeable. 

The UKMET over the years is an example of how h5 verification does not always correlate to being a good model for the specifics of a snowstorm.  The details that lead to the exact amount of snow in your specific yard rely on things that might not be perfectly correlated to the model that is closest at getting 500mb heights correct on a hemispheric scale.  That said...it doesn't jump around any worse than the GFS for example...it just hasn't in my experience over the years...been that much better at predicting snowstorms for our area despite its higher verification scores.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the UKMET...in it's defense for years the maps I saw posted here with UKMET snowfall output were counting any kind of frozen precip as snow...which often gave the false impression it was showing more snow or further south when other guidance was north.  That is not the models fault...that is a bad map and user error.  I do not think that is true of the current Pivotal Kuchera maps being shared...they look to have fixed that issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

 

It really is such a weird situation we're in.   Especially this close in.  I mean, there are usually some model differences, but this scattershot is wild.   Models running the gamut, from damn near nothing, to warning criteria, to a rainstorm all the way up to Mitch and co. within 48 hours of a storm.  Crazy times.

I think the reason is because when I was looking at the differences last night, even between the most amplified and least (RGEM to NAM) there wasn't all that much difference in terms of major synoptic features...The SW and vort was a little more amplified on the RGEM and the boundary was a little further NW...and that made the difference between some 6-12" snowstorm up into central PA or some weak POS nothing wave sliding southeast of us.  Guidance will struggle more when were talking about discreet features making such a significant difference.  These progressive boundary waves are harder to nail down for guidance in general, but this one seems particularly delicate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...