Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,684
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Szaquli
    Newest Member
    Szaquli
    Joined

1/19 - The Weekend Roulette Wheel Thing


DDweatherman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CAPE said:

I'll happily take 3 inches of snow and no rain and not give a damn what you get. It's all about me, remember? B)

yes. When i was a kid--it was always the N and W suburbs. Looks like you were well prepared for the South and East climate shift!

looking forward to seeing pics of your winter cabin again

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody mentioned the 18z Ukie, probably because the 6 and 18z runs only go out 66hrs. Anyway, it was near identical to 12z at 72hrs, except for a touch stronger slp in western NC at 1007mb instead of 1008mb and touch higher heights as a result.

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2025011618&fh=66&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ma&p=prateptype_ukmo-imp&m=ukmo_global

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Nobody mentioned the 18z Ukie, probably because the 6 and 18z runs only go out 66hrs. Anyway, it was near identical to 12z at 72hrs, except for a touch stronger slp in western NC at 1007mb instead of 1008mb and touch higher heights as a result.

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?rh=2025011618&fh=66&dpdt=&mc=&r=us_ma&p=prateptype_ukmo-imp&m=ukmo_global

It's significantly SE with the thermal boundary compared to the RGEM at the same time.  My guess is it ends up in between the GFS/Euro type track and the RGEM/GGEM solution.  Judging by where the thermals are at 66 hours my guess is right along 95 ends up the boundary between rain/snow mix and little accumulations and the heavy snow area.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

It's significantly SE with the thermal boundary compared to the RGEM at the same time.  My guess is it ends up in between the GFS/Euro type track and the RGEM/GGEM solution.  Judging by where the thermals are at 66 hours my guess is right along 95 ends up the boundary between rain/snow mix and little accumulations and the heavy snow area.  

Sounds a lot like 12z snowfall 

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=ukmo_global&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2025011612&fh=105&r=us_ma&dpdt=&mc=&pwplus=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

You can just click on the map to see them.  But I wouldn’t be sweating the thermals from the most amped model at this time.  If the models converge on a solution like this then yeah we’ll be parsing them in detail. 

For some reason the sounding is not available on the cmc on ttb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CAPE said:

Latest Heavy snow disco from WPC-

Mid Atlantic and Northeast...
Day 3...

A trailing wave along the southern periphery of the Arctic front
will exit out of the southeastern U.S with an expectation for the
wave to amplify as it approaches the Southern Mid Atlantic with
attendant surface cyclogenesis across the Deep South, moving
northeast. Recent ensemble and deterministic output via the 12z
suite of NWP has become increasingly aggressive with the signal for
a low end moderate event for heavy snow prospects, mainly from
southwestern VA up through the Central Mid Atlantic, eventually
bleeding into the periods following as the pattern shifts northeast
up through the Northern Mid Atlantic (PA/NY) and Southern New
England. There has been some discrepancy within the suite on the
exact placement of the heaviest precip potential with a split on
two camps favoring a more amplified setup (UKMET/CMC) and a less
amplified evolution (ECMWF) with the GFS now solidly in the middle
of the two camps. ECMWF AIFS ML output has been very steady over
the course of the last 3+ days of output with the latest run
showing great consistency when assessing run-to-run variability.
This lends credence to a slightly better confidence with regards to
snowfall potential across the area with the probabilities of >4"
going from close to 0% overnight towards (10-30%) within a span of
one run. It's a period to monitor as heavy snowfall threat would
impact the population centers of the DMV up through Philadelphia
and points northeast in the periods beyond.

You’re welcome :)

  • Like 22
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

My heart was warmed by the usage of Euro AIFS ML 

Me and the Met on the QPF desk had lots of conversation while doing the forecast today. We both were taking note over the past several days of the AIFS remaining steadfast. I felt it was necessary to add to the disco as AI has been around for a while now and we have verification scores, and we have enough data to see trends over the past 1-1.5 years. It’s been a great tool to see where things could trend. When the AIFS is locked in, it has been really helpful. It was really good during Hurricane season and so far it’s been decent within mid-latitude evolution. Still not perfect by any means, but it’s very useful in the right scenario. This seems like it has some merit. 
 

I will say that the AI isn’t going to replicate banding structures very well and the QPF output is smoothed compared to dynamical output. That said, I believe it has the right idea and some minor shifts could still occur, but I think we have the main synoptic evolution down. Just down to finer details and thermal profiles. 

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...