Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,703
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Szaquli
    Newest Member
    Szaquli
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Looks like a wet snow here to start then drying out. That’s good because powder will blow away and sublimate next week.

Get some meat in the snow before the cold shot. Hopefully we can sharpen up the vort one more tick and make this a low end warning event. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

late to the party this morning; this has likely already been discussed.   the eps/geps/gefs mean all were a step in the direction of coherence on this thing.  this is a positive for event enthusiasts

for me, i have the same approach to this that i did two or so days ago...  this needs to be < 96 if not 72 hours before the confidence slope.   it's due to the fast nature of the flow in a very compressed field.  this circumstance lowers the confidence more than typical, relative to lead times, for a couple of reasons.

1  the suppressive/negative interference flirts with being total ( enough to be a non-event).  whether it is enough to completely miss ( yesterday's op gfs') or backs off enough to gets us into the action (op cmc) ... that requires higher resolution that a, is better provided by the operational runs, and b ...gets better in shorter terms.  bringing this up because more typically ... a general risk assessment might rely more on the various ens means, but this circumstantially makes that challenging.   this is an anomalously compressed total circulation mode predicament.  the 06z gfs combine with the modest, albeit real, spread on the eps on the nw side of the track mean, which in itself, are clues that support the < 72 hour philosophy for me.

2 the impact corridor of any system is narrowed/stretched along the dx.  there's other aspects like fast motion of the storm not being able to overcome the moisture sink further west of the center... nuances et al, limits the impact region so narrowly, this compounds reason 1 above even more, because we're asking the models to then be very precise about at a range they are even more challenged to be accurate. 

..the two factors above are always in play when your dealing with these impacted flow regimes - it's a matter of how much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Would need to intensify more rapidly…ala 12/29-30/93. That was like a sharper/more intense version of one of the systems with very strong fronto on the cold side. 

I was thinking of that one the other day. Man I wish I could see radar from that one. I know it's not the quality as it would be shortly after Doppler got installed but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, brooklynwx99 said:

the difference between the CMC and ECMWF is quite small. really difficult forecast

ezgif-7-608bb1b7da.thumb.gif.60f87c97c6fae6f2cf6323fbf4c57dd9.gif

this is the high sensitivity i was just discussing.   one is hard pressed to see differences there that would typically inspire one version or the other yet we're seeing enormous implications from these very minute differences -

it's all because of the compression circumstance. 

i just suggest people try to take these model runs on the chin, in both directions, until we get inside of 84 hours with the full compliments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dendrite said:

I mean I immediately posted that the ens from the real models looked better after trashing the lousy ICON, but keep drinking away with ice#s.

oh there's a separate phenomenon with this engagement that's ( frankly..) a bit manic in the proper psycho-babble sense...

it almost doesn't matter what the model is, reputation and quantitative skill ..etc etc, so long as it paints the illustration that triggers -

that's why when enjoying a cup of morning coffee and cracking open the overnight's frivolities ... i seldom any more move my own needle on any inspiration or interest, motivated by the shared optimism that is apparent in here.   because hands down... i go look at the synoptics and i'm like, 'what the f are they talking about'   hahaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...