Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,696
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptkalogu
    Newest Member
    Ptkalogu
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, SouthCoastMA said:

People were locking in the RGEM, Euro starting moving towards it, people called it a cave..then all other guidance started moving back towards the Euro. A compromise, where the euro will likely end up closest with these latest trends 

And I get to go forth with my May 1st thread :tomato: 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthCoastMA said:

People were locking in the RGEM, Euro starting moving towards it, people called it a cave..then all other guidance started moving back towards the Euro. A compromise, where the euro will likely end up closest with these latest trends 

Great. Will be lucky for 3” here then. The Meh-rrimack Valley is a disaster for weather enthusiasts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

My thought process is that while interior se MA may catch up late, they will start a bit slowly, so I just have them catching up. But I am concerned thst spot may be another max.

A lot of areas out east will start a bit slow. Prob a few rain drops or white rain at the onset while initial banding is west and then I’d expect it to all of the sudden go nuts. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H2Otown_WX said:

Why so much QPF there? CF enhancement or just the rapid deepening of the low?

They are in a great spot as the midlevels start closing off. CF will enhance a bit too but it’s mostly getting into that great zone just as the midlevels close off…can help intensify banding and perhaps prolong it an extra hour or two. 
 

That zone could still shift a bit though and we’ll just have to nowcast where any smaller meso bands might set up. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Not for near BOS and SE MA. Pretty nice look there. 

I think west of Worcester and north of the Pike should prepare for mundane and just be happy that we’re getting accumulating snow.

 Any ticks east or weakening and out here we will be looking at a  2”- 3” type deal. 

I was hoping Berkshire East could pick up 6”+ but not really confident on that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the original 3-5 we were being called for seems to be correct. Maybe 6 if we're lucky. OK with that, ground white with a waning moon during a frigid snap. It should be our best hit so far. We got 4" last Saturday, but that's gone now. Could be a lot worse, the way this winter has been running.:)

BOX still has us at 8"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

A lot of areas out east will start a bit slow. Prob a few rain drops or white rain at the onset while initial banding is west and then I’d expect it to all of the sudden go nuts. 

If you take a look at the latest NAM/GFS in Bufkit, even out Scooter's way it's like an hour of maybe catpaws and then it starts ripping. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said:

then can you give me insight as to how Albany sucks so bad?

Speaking not of ALY, but the NWS more broadly, I think there is a tendency to get sucked in by the QPF. The pressures of short staffing combined with added duties beyond the forecast are leading to more and more step by step building of the forecast. It's great for duplication and amending the forecast, but it can lead to less critical thinking at times. For instance, does the QPF max location make physical sense? Is the storm moving slow enough for widespread double digit snowfall? etc.

That's why I like coming here and talking about the weather. It forces me to think about why I'm doing what I'm doing in the grids. And when in doubt I can always start high and adjust higher based off the KFS.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Speaking not of ALY, but the NWS more broadly, I think there is a tendency to get sucked in by the QPF. The pressures of short staffing combined with added duties beyond the forecast are leading to more and more step by step building of the forecast. It's great for duplication and amending the forecast, but it can lead to less critical thinking at times. For instance, does the QPF max location make physical sense? Is the storm moving slow enough for widespread double digit snowfall? etc.

That's why I like coming here and talking about the weather. It forces me to think about why I'm doing what I'm doing in the grids. And when in doubt I can always start high and adjust higher based off the KFS.

let me guess, NWS only hired people with degrees?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...