tavwtby Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago ALY hoisted warning a few minutes ago... still saying 7+", 8.6 over my head... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. 3k or 12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Just now, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. 3km might be even more Meh. Those runs were basically keeping the WCB and CCB completely disjointed. The WCB just runs east with all that convection. Which could be real too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 6 minutes ago, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. Not really sure what people are expecting. I feel like that’s what is most likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, SnowGoose69 said: I think what he did this year was an aberration honestly, same story with Darnold as we already saw No way. The Giants didn’t have a good enough O line for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted 8 hours ago Author Share Posted 8 hours ago Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr is meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, weathafella said: Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr is meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitz Craver Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, weathafella said: Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr are meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Watch as we get towards meso range this thing starts chasing convection to the east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Mesos showing little interest is a bit concerning, Like some have said, Other then the Euro, Today's trends have been meh, Wait until 0z. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Debbie’s already starting . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. I'm having a hard time finding a Cobb total above 10 inches. The closest really is the GFS around BED right at 10 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick-02540 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 15 minutes ago, tavwtby said: ALY hoisted warning a few minutes ago... still saying 7+", 8.6 over my head... They have me at 5-9. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick-02540 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . Yup. But not me. I'm getting 12". And that's it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Patrick-02540 said: They have me at 5-9. 4-10 here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitz Craver Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . I don’t want to be a Debbie, I’m desperate for snow, LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Kitz Craver said: I don’t want to be a Debbie, I’m desperate for snow, LOL So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Damage In Tolland said: So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Just now, CoastalWx said: There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. Beggars can’t be choosers this season. A 6” storm is a MECS in this regime. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan63 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. If I got 2-4 I would be ecstatic at this point. Would be nice to see no grass for once. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Just now, HoarfrostHubb said: Beggars can’t be choosers this season. A 6” storm is a MECS in this regime. This is 1980s when you see Dick Albert putting you in the purple zone lol. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Bryan63 said: If I got 2-4 I would be ecstatic at this point. Would be nice to see no grass for once. I would be disgusted with 2-4. Warning event or bust in my eyes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, George001 said: I would be disgusted with 2-4. Warning event or bust in my eyes I think you'll be ok with this one coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . That's the result of having so many models creating so much noise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, OceanStWx said: We have to keep in mind the regime we're in right now too. The Pacific jet is in retraction right now, which is more prone to unpredictability in the models. The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen. Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14. Uncertainty continues. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Greg said: I think you'll be ok with this one coming. Yeah I’m feeling good about this one. This will likely be the biggest storm since the Jan 2022 blizzard here, and there are more threats in the pipeline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. After all this I’ll be disappointed with less than 6-10”. That should be very doable . I’ll be happy with the snow but unhappy with the rug pull at last minute.. should that happen and turns this into a 1-3” event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 3 minutes ago, tamarack said: The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen. Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14. Uncertainty continues. Just wait until I get a hold of them in the next hour. Those ranges are based off of the WPC super ensemble after all, but there are definitely issues with that. If Kuchera is part of that distribution it is going to shift the 90% to a pretty high number. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now