Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,703
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Szaquli
    Newest Member
    Szaquli
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

If Reggie doesn’t move at least 100 miles SE 18z, then Euro suite will need to correct NW

Pretty sure it’s going to correct NW regardless. The question is whether it’s the typical 70/30 compromise we often see when the euro is in a battle or if it caves more than that. My hedge is that it will “win” the short term compromise (I.e. the Canadian models will move further SE than the Euro moves NW). Canadians seemed to have won the medium range battle though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah shit.    man, seeing the Euro cluster this way, it does shake my confidence. 

I had been warning all along that this would be a shorter term correction nightmare.  Spent all that time talking about the compression handling ... recall " < 72 hours"  ? 

But I admit to thinking we might be coalescing the consensus short of 96 hours earlier. Seeing this though...  I don't know.  It could be one or the other wins,  or some percentage of either in a split of the goal posts.  

I was not sold ( still not ) on the heftier impact scenarios tho.  That same compression should really theoretically cap this thing's potential.  I just didn't think that would be because we get flurried -

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Pretty sure it’s going to correct NW regardless. The question is whether it’s the typical 70/30 compromise we often see when the euro is in a battle or if it caves more than that. My hedge is that it will “win” the short term compromise (I.e. the Canadian models will move further SE than the Euro moves NW). Canadians seemed to have won the medium range battle though. 

5-10 years ago we didn’t these massive battles.. though Reggie never went out 4-5 days back then either. Let’s get it just off the Cape and make everyone happy 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

5-10 years ago we didn’t these massive battles.. though Reggie never went out 4-5 days back then either. Let’s get it just off the Cape and make everyone happy 

pretty sure we did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

5-10 years ago we didn’t these massive battles.. though Reggie never went out 4-5 days back then either. Let’s get it just off the Cape and make everyone happy 

oooh yes we did

c'mon Kev think back

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, moneypitmike said:

That’s like Tip starting a thread 7 days out

Actually ... that's like anyone starting a thread 7 days out and having people that don't know how to read, immediately interpret it as though it's a storm projection - when it's merely discussing the table setting.    

There's no problem with starting threads 5-7 days ahead of a "period of interest" to discuss why.   "Look to this period of time for x-y-z to emerge because - "

If it's a declared a high confidence event thread, that's a different coverage and purpose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Actually ... that's like anyone starting a thread 7 days out and having people that don't know how to read, immediately interpret it as though it's a storm projection - when it's merely discussing the table setting.    

There's no problem with starting threads 5-7 days ahead of a "period of interest" to discuss why.   "Look to this period of time for x-y-z to emerge because - "

If it's a declared a high confidence event thread, that's a different coverage and purpose. 

Lighten up, Francis.  it’s a joke.
:)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

Lighten up, Francis.  it’s a joke.
:)

yeeah.... it was funny and jocular 5 years ago - use someone elses name.  It does become a problem when you keep singling one person out. 

 

Francis

  • Haha 1
  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One way to look at this ...

... if the GEFs/GFS and the like were to be say 80% more correct in this battle, that would square the season. 

Because the EPS mean seem to win 80% of the argument on the last coverage.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, both Will and myself mentioned the NAM was trending since yesterday.  This is incrementally another trend step - almost collapsing toward the "anti EPS" consensus.

Man, this will be really satisfying watching the EPS capitulate

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...