Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,700
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Syamewi
    Newest Member
    Syamewi
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

NAM is still flat and strung out with its vorticity…just no punch coming in from the upper levels. H5 across NAMER just looks spuriously different from the other models though. We’ll see what the rest of the 00z suite does, but I think it’s still in the synoptically challenged camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RDRY said:

NAM be like "there's a storm?"

So.. what do we make of the NAM? Not sure anyone else is on the same island. I'm guessing it will start to come around maybe tomorrow afternoon? I'm hoping. Even with so much model support that this storm is coming, there's always that feeling of the Rug about to be pulled from under your feet. But.. more of better trends than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

So.. what do we make of the NAM? Not sure anyone else is on the same island. I'm guessing it will start to come around maybe tomorrow afternoon? I'm hoping. Even with so much model support that this storm is coming, there's always that feeling of the Rug about to be pulled from under your feet. But.. more of better trends than not.

I'm not knowledge enough to make anything of the NAM. Then again, who is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

The NAM totally sucked last week too with the storm in the south, not sure why its suddenly having such major issues, been awhile since I've seen it do this

Time for it to actually be retired like they've talked about for several years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

The NAM totally sucked last week too with the storm in the south, not sure why its suddenly having such major issues, been awhile since I've seen it do this

Maybe certain people are tweaking the inputs, making it worse than it already is, so they can say it sucks, let's just get rid of it. Wasn't there talk years back about getting rid of the Nam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nammy has a little northern shit streak out ahead of the system that is knocking down heights and not enabling the shortwave and downstream ridging to amplify. The RGEM is obviously the other extreme with a more potent punch of dPVA swinging through to help initiate sfc pressure falls.

image.gif

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very 2025 for the NAM to score a coup over all the other guidance for the first time in the direction of "not a storm" rather than its usual excitement over storms that fizzle/miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

No.. but wouldn't be we say this is the farthest west solution..... Then, if we take the farthest east solution model ( not including the NAM )... It should be a decent hit.

GGEM will look just like it too, More amped solutions will be west, Weaker will be east, I'd rather a stronger low then weaker low, Some pay either way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...