Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,700
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Syamewi
    Newest Member
    Syamewi
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

wth...using MOS numbers for snowfall? I didn't realize anyone still did that. MOS is a piece of trash, unfortunately there is nothing else to use for quickly forecasting temperatures.

It’s just for fun.    Although sometimes they have a clue wrt trends.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

It’s just for fun.    Although sometimes they have a clue wrt trends.  

I just really hate MOS :lol:

When I used to participate in the forecast challenge, if you basically ripped and read MOS for temps/wind you would get destroyed. Unfortunately, I still use MOS/NBM a ton because there is no other choice but it is cringeworthy how bad it really is and can be. I know feasibly forecasting specifics like temp/sky cover/wind takes an in-depth dive but if you don't have that capability to really do that...ugly ugly 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Assuming this stays on course, the NAM should probably start becoming more beneficial 12z or 18z Saturday when really starting to diagnose banding potential and those specifics. 

If this system is real, the Nam will go from nothing to probably over amped once it "sees" the storm....maybe between 48 and 72 hours

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Better

ref1km_ptype.conus (1).png

I agree, and even if you look at what it shows for the Saturday wave. Shows that East where everyone else has some light rain getting into the whole area. The fact that this is coming West more is just a sign that it's adjusting itself accordingly. If the storm were tomorrow or even the day after, I'd be a bit more concerned if it showed this, but the fact that it's slowly coreecting itself is a good sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I just really hate MOS :lol:

When I used to participate in the forecast challenge, if you basically ripped and read MOS for temps/wind you would get destroyed. Unfortunately, I still use MOS/NBM a ton because there is no other choice but it is cringeworthy how bad it really is and can be. I know feasibly forecasting specifics like temp/sky cover/wind takes an in-depth dive but if you don't have that capability to really do that...ugly ugly 

Idk…MOS has historically been pretty good. But yeah, if you want to win wxchallenge you need to know when to deviate. But if you’re trying to stray from MOS all the time…good luck…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

Idk…MOS has historically been pretty good. But yeah, if you want to win wxchallenge you need to know when to deviate. But if you’re trying to stray from MOS all the time…good luck…

I think it also depends on region...some areas it can be brutal in. Obviously it isn't going to handle anomalous patterns well but you're right...you have to know when to deviate from it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...