Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,699
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Wolfpack25
    Newest Member
    Wolfpack25
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, tunafish said:

Annual reminder:  nobody knows where the fook "here" is for 90% of the posters that reference it as their location.  

 

6.4" total, 0.49" liquid for Portland, ME.

Not often I get beat that bad by the “Jetport”

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Where’s the widespread 6-9”?

I'm pissed at myself for going 5-8" for such a large area but I was unsure how to really translate all the concerns into map form lol. The swaths of highest totals ended up being where I was thinking and there was pretty good support for that. This is why sometimes QPF is one of the last things I'll really look at. You start looking at QPF output right away and the beer goggles go on. I mean you can get a general sense of what QPF will be like anyways assessing everything. I am glad though I didn't go bonkers with those amped solutions starting arising in the typical 72ish hour time frame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I'm pissed at myself for going 5-8" for such a large area but I was unsure how to really translate all the concerns into map form lol. The swaths of highest totals ended up being where I was thinking and there was pretty good support for that. This is why sometimes QPF is one of the last things I'll really look at. You start looking at QPF output right away and the beer goggles go on. I mean you can get a general sense of what QPF will be like anyways assessing everything. I am glad though I didn't go bonkers with those amped solutions starting arising in the typical 72ish hour time frame. 

The 5-8 range incorporates that...I'm satisfied with it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The 5-8 range incorporates that...I'm satisfied with it.

I gotta stop getting so heavily influenced by the cute SLP/QPF maps...that's what tends to get me, especially when you'll have say like the GFS which isn't going to resolve some of the finer nuisances like the mesos would so it has that beautiful looking QPF shield. Gotta get these questions embedded into the noggin:

1) Does the QPF on that widespread of a scale make sense?

2) If that QPF makes sense, what is happening with that QPF (which this question could have a subset of several additional questions)?

3) What is going on with llvl and mlvl storm evolution and how is that impacting overall lift? Is there going to be a heavy reliance for narrow bands of frontogenesis or are we looking at a larger scale source for greater and more intense banding? 

How this precipitation shield evolved...IMO the NAM and Euro really nailed it but I can remember that 12z NAM run from Friday...seemed like so many were quick to discount it because the precip shield didn't make sense...well it did make sense and the reasons why it made sense, verified nicely. Heavier stuff northwest, kind of crap in the middle unless you got lucky with some narrow bands, and then heavier stuff northeast.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheMainer said:

Around an inch here, storm definitely shit the bed, last NWS update here was still 4-6. Oh well, guess another week of not opening trails, local businesses are hurting after 4 straight crappy winters up here, might as well sell the sleds and move to somewhere we can golf year round. 

Where are you in Maine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...