tavwtby Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 ALY hoisted warning a few minutes ago... still saying 7+", 8.6 over my head... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:16 PM, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. Expand 3k or 12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:16 PM, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. Expand 3km might be even more Meh. Those runs were basically keeping the WCB and CCB completely disjointed. The WCB just runs east with all that convection. Which could be real too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:16 PM, weathafella said: Overall a meh solution on the NAM. High end advisory low end warning snows. Expand Not really sure what people are expecting. I feel like that’s what is most likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 7:21 PM, SnowGoose69 said: I think what he did this year was an aberration honestly, same story with Darnold as we already saw Expand No way. The Giants didn’t have a good enough O line for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 18 Author Share Posted January 18 Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr is meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:26 PM, weathafella said: Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr is meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Expand Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitz Craver Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:26 PM, weathafella said: Both NAMs are meh. Long range hrrr are meh. With that said, let’s see how they are closer in. We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness. Expand Watch as we get towards meso range this thing starts chasing convection to the east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Mesos showing little interest is a bit concerning, Like some have said, Other then the Euro, Today's trends have been meh, Wait until 0z. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Debbie’s already starting . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:30 PM, ORH_wxman said: Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. Expand I'm having a hard time finding a Cobb total above 10 inches. The closest really is the GFS around BED right at 10 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick-02540 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:18 PM, tavwtby said: ALY hoisted warning a few minutes ago... still saying 7+", 8.6 over my head... Expand They have me at 5-9. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick-02540 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:33 PM, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . Expand Yup. But not me. I'm getting 12". And that's it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:34 PM, Patrick-02540 said: They have me at 5-9. Expand 4-10 here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitz Craver Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:33 PM, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . Expand I don’t want to be a Debbie, I’m desperate for snow, LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:40 PM, Kitz Craver said: I don’t want to be a Debbie, I’m desperate for snow, LOL Expand So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:42 PM, Damage In Tolland said: So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come Expand There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:43 PM, CoastalWx said: There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. Expand Beggars can’t be choosers this season. A 6” storm is a MECS in this regime. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan63 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:43 PM, CoastalWx said: There’s definitely some red flags. Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. Expand If I got 2-4 I would be ecstatic at this point. Would be nice to see no grass for once. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:45 PM, HoarfrostHubb said: Beggars can’t be choosers this season. A 6” storm is a MECS in this regime. Expand This is 1980s when you see Dick Albert putting you in the purple zone lol. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:42 PM, Damage In Tolland said: So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come Expand It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:46 PM, Bryan63 said: If I got 2-4 I would be ecstatic at this point. Would be nice to see no grass for once. Expand I would be disgusted with 2-4. Warning event or bust in my eyes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:49 PM, George001 said: I would be disgusted with 2-4. Warning event or bust in my eyes Expand I think you'll be ok with this one coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:33 PM, Damage In Tolland said: Debbie’s already starting . Expand That's the result of having so many models creating so much noise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 7:49 PM, OceanStWx said: We have to keep in mind the regime we're in right now too. The Pacific jet is in retraction right now, which is more prone to unpredictability in the models. Expand The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen. Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14. Uncertainty continues. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:51 PM, Greg said: I think you'll be ok with this one coming. Expand Yeah I’m feeling good about this one. This will likely be the biggest storm since the Jan 2022 blizzard here, and there are more threats in the pipeline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:48 PM, ORH_wxman said: It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. Expand After all this I’ll be disappointed with less than 6-10”. That should be very doable . I’ll be happy with the snow but unhappy with the rug pull at last minute.. should that happen and turns this into a 1-3” event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/18/2025 at 8:52 PM, tamarack said: The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen. Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14. Uncertainty continues. Expand Just wait until I get a hold of them in the next hour. Those ranges are based off of the WPC super ensemble after all, but there are definitely issues with that. If Kuchera is part of that distribution it is going to shift the 90% to a pretty high number. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now