Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,696
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Ptkalogu
    Newest Member
    Ptkalogu
    Joined

As WAR expands, do our snow chances increase? First wave may produce a middling event-solid advisory and possible low end warning for MLK Weekend


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, weathafella said:

Overall a meh solution on the NAM.  High end advisory low end warning snows.

3km might be even more Meh. Those runs were basically keeping the WCB and CCB completely disjointed. The WCB just runs east with all that convection. Which could be real too. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weathafella said:

Both NAMs are meh.  Long range hrrr is meh.  With that said, let’s see how they are closer in.  We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness.

Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weathafella said:

Both NAMs are meh.  Long range hrrr are meh.  With that said, let’s see how they are closer in.  We’re still kind of on the outer edge of meso usefulness.

Watch as we get towards meso range this thing starts chasing convection to the east 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah but it’s def a bit of a red flag for the higher end amounts. We’ll see how 00z goes. 

I'm having a hard time finding a Cobb total above 10 inches. The closest really is the GFS around BED right at 10 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kitz Craver said:

I don’t want to be a Debbie, I’m desperate for snow, LOL

So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come 

There’s definitely some red flags.  Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. 

  • Like 5
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

There’s definitely some red flags.  Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. 

Beggars can’t be choosers this season.  A 6” storm is a MECS in this regime. 
 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

There’s definitely some red flags.  Not all models are agreeing on a good conveyor belt of moisture and it’s a fast mover. Still, I’d be happy as a pig in shit if I got 4-6”. Everyone should be. 

If I got 2-4 I would be ecstatic at this point. Would be nice to see no grass for once.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said:

So far it’s the NAM which has been horrific from the beginning on this. If folks tossed Reggie, NAM should be as well. Now if the whole 18z suite cuts way back and then 00z drops to dustings -2” , then Debbie can come 

It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OceanStWx said:

We have to keep in mind the regime we're in right now too. The Pacific jet is in retraction right now, which is more prone to unpredictability in the models. 

The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen.  Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14.  Uncertainty continues.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

It’s frequently a red flag when NAM is paltry because the bias of that model is to be zonked with huge QPF. We’d be tossing it if it showed a solution tracking over Scooter’s Fanny. I don’t think there’s a reason to be crazy down on this event, but I don’t want unrealistic expectations either….widespread big warning totals (say lots of double digit amounts mixed with with high single digits) might be a heavy lift. 

After all this I’ll be disappointed with less than 6-10”. That should be very doable . I’ll be happy with the snow but unhappy with the rug pull at last minute.. should that happen and turns this into a 1-3” event 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tamarack said:

The 90%/most-likely/10% from GYX are as wide as I've seen.  Skowhegan's numbers are <1/6/14.  Uncertainty continues.

Just wait until I get a hold of them in the next hour. :devilsmiley:

Those ranges are based off of the WPC super ensemble after all, but there are definitely issues with that. If Kuchera is part of that distribution it is going to shift the 90% to a pretty high number.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...