OceanStWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: I know. Just stick with 10:1. I know we harp on it all the time, but I just saw a post from AMS that Kuchera (or Max T aloft) has the largest errors of all the SLR. Utah is testing a new random forest SLR that shows promising results, beating all other methods out there. Like the rest it does struggle most with the extreme SLRs (too low). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Canadian / GFS seem to have best handle 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: I know we harp on it all the time, but I just saw a post from AMS that Kuchera (or Max T aloft) has the largest errors of all the SLR. Utah is testing a new random forest SLR that shows promising results, beating all other methods out there. Like the rest it does struggle most with the extreme SLRs (too low). Bufkit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: Canadian / GFS seem to have best handle Lol... And how do you come up with that outcome? Yes, they both show the best solutions with The most snowfall for the region, and they may be right in the end.... But as some have already mentioned, there's a fast flow, the Euro definitely is on the east side of the model runs. I guess we can say they're in the middle of everything? I'm just leery to say that they have the best handle on what's going on. Love to get your reason why you feel they have the best handle on what's going to happen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: I know we harp on it all the time, but I just saw a post from AMS that Kuchera (or Max T aloft) has the largest errors of all the SLR. Utah is testing a new random forest SLR that shows promising results, beating all other methods out there. Like the rest it does struggle most with the extreme SLRs (too low). Even better than cobb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Because Euro has been OTS East .. back west back east flopping around. GGEM has been steadfast for days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, weatherwiz said: Even better than cobb? Yes. I'm partial to Cobb myself because it is more dynamic than other SLRs but it's not perfect around here either. It actually showed the 850-700 mb thickness as having the lowest errors in the eastern CONUS. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Just now, OceanStWx said: Yes. I'm partial to Cobb myself because it is more dynamic than other SLRs Oh boy...I hope they can incorporate that into bufkit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Snowcrazed71 said: Lol... And how do you come up with that outcome? Yes, they both show the best solutions with The most snowfall for the region, and they may be right in the end.... But as some have already mentioned, there's a fast flow, the Euro definitely is on the east side of the model runs. I guess we can say they're in the middle of everything? I'm just leery to say that they have the best handle on what's going on. Love to get your reason why you feel they have the best handle on what's going to happen. His snow goggles have been on since the last bust but once they are on, they stay on until 3/1. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: Yes. I'm partial to Cobb myself because it is more dynamic than other SLRs but it's not perfect around here either. It actually showed the 850-700 mb thickness as having the lowest errors in the eastern CONUS. " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 EPS is NW of the OP, similar to 06z 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 I would be quite happy with an Advisory/low end Warning snowfall here 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 We’ve got a solid 6-10 lolli 12 storm coming it appears 1 1 1 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 6 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: Oh boy...I hope they can incorporate that into bufkit https://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/bufkit/data/retro_map.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 16 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Euro falls in line with the fast flow anal boundry and thus more reasonable. A flacid but taken low end advisory. I suggest at this point you go all in on a society halting ... no j/k. Confidence is up for an event - I'm not sold on magnitude. Like I've been saying/reasons why ... this really should cap at mid scale 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: Yes. I'm partial to Cobb myself because it is more dynamic than other SLRs So the Max Temp in Profile option in bufkit is just Kuchera? And then theres Cobb05 and Cobb11 which i still dont know which is the better to use and what the difference is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Just in my opinion the trend in the Euro is more telling here. Also, it looks like the EPS is ahead of the game comparing to the operational. The 06z EPS ( from what I can tell...) was about where the operational is now, but the EPS of now is closer than the operational. In other words, the op version is playing catch-up This is red flag that the correction vector in the operational is NW of prior runs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRSno Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Glad I chose the right weekend to visit! And at the first hint of a storm I changed my return from Monday to Tuesday 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: !So the Max Temp in Profile option in bufkit is just Kuchera? And then theres Cobb05 and Cobb11 which i still dont know which is the better to use and what the difference is. MT is Basically Kuchie Koo 5 refers to 2005 11 to 2011 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, BRSno said: Glad I chose the right weekend to visit! And at the first hint of a storm I changed my return from Monday to Tuesday Where are you from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 12 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: I would be quite happy with an Advisory/low end Warning snowfall here I'll take anything that whitens the ground with the cold shot coming next week, I want a winter feel. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 My method is simple and works well. Go with 10:1 this far out...I mean that is why you have a range, correct? Once you get closer and can figure out where the cross hair sig lies, then you can get cute with amounts. If you are sure your area is better than 10:1..maybe you can do like 14:1 this far out...but not worth getting cute. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 16 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: We’ve got a solid 6-10 lolli 12 storm coming it appears It’s not even 5pm yet bruh… 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: My method is simple and works well. Go with 10:1 this far out...I mean that is why you have a range, correct? Once you get closer and can figure out where the cross hair sig lies, then you can get cute with amounts. If you are sure your area is better than 10:1..maybe you can do like 14:1 this far out...but not worth getting cute. Method Man? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: It’s not even 5pm yet bruh… Glad to see you’ve picked yourself up out of the toilet and have come back to some sense of weather reality acknowledging a nice hit is coming 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: Method Man? You best protect your neck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: My method is simple and works well. Go with 10:1 this far out...I mean that is why you have a range, correct? Once you get closer and can figure out where the cross hair sig lies, then you can get cute with amounts. If you are sure your area is better than 10:1..maybe you can do like 14:1 this far out...but not worth getting cute. Yeah and even in colder profiles, I've had 10 to 1 or worse....I think it was the 12/13/07 traffic catastrophe storm where I had 8-9" of pure baking powder at 22-24F and it was prob slightly under 10 to 1...had nearly an inch of QPF. I think even the ORH ASOS only had near 10 to 1 and we know how the ASOS undercatches snowfall QPF a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Yeah and even in colder profiles, I've had 10 to 1 or worse....I think it was the 12/13/07 traffic catastrophe storm where I had 8-9" of pure baking powder at 22-24F and it was prob slightly under 10 to 1...had nearly an inch of QPF. I think even the ORH ASOS only had near 10 to 1 and we know how the ASOS undercatches snowfall QPF a lot. But kind of awesome to get that low vis heavy snow and 8-11" out of it region wide. Good base snow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 20 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: So the Max Temp in Profile option in bufkit is just Kuchera? And then theres Cobb05 and Cobb11 which i still dont know which is the better to use and what the difference is. Max temp and Kuchera are the same. There are two equations, based on what the max temp in the profile is. And then Cobb05 and Cobb11 are just the years the study and the update were published I believe. So in theory 11 should be a bit better performance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 10 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: My method is simple and works well. Go with 10:1 this far out...I mean that is why you have a range, correct? Once you get closer and can figure out where the cross hair sig lies, then you can get cute with amounts. If you are sure your area is better than 10:1..maybe you can do like 14:1 this far out...but not worth getting cute. If you want to be a real weenie you could go 11:1, that's climo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now