Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,705
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Climax
    Newest Member
    Climax
    Joined

January 10/11 Winter Storm Potential - May the Odds be Ever in our Favor


eyewall
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, franklin NCwx said:

Could be how cold/dry the arctic airmass is that is in place ahead of the system.  Dew points are very cold at onset

Here’s the 12Z CMC for the same time, which much better concurs with the guideline of a 546-7 thickness snow line: this is like night and day vs the GFS!

IMG_1674.thumb.png.a66e763e0d2c0784eb588e7988707006.png

Again for comparison, here’s GFS with snow with thicknesses almost to 558!

IMG_1673.thumb.png.2868f0356fd2f36f7d273e817b02313e.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the CMC killed the streak of every model trending positively (I know foothills and I-40 folks disagree) but taken at face value it’s a major winter storm for everyone. Just a crippling ice storm for the piedmont. Foothills to SW Virginia get smoked with snow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthHillsWx said:

Well the CMC killed the streak of every model trending positively (I know foothills and I-40 folks disagree) but taken at face value it’s a major winter storm for everyone. Just a crippling ice storm for the piedmont. Foothills to SW Virginia get smoked with snow 

yup 

1736629200-n121YZkrSwQ.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, snowmaker13 said:

yup 

1736629200-n121YZkrSwQ.png

I hate to see this but mainly ZR instead of mainly snow actually makes more sense for much of this area based on 1000/500 mb thicknesses guidelines. Also, I’m considering the track of the low.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthHillsWx said:

With surface temps in the mid 20’s I’d have to think a lot of that freezing rain modeled would likely be sleet. 1-3” of sleet/snow with a glaze of ice would be acceptable in my neighborhood 

Need to be 0c at 925mb don't we

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaryWx said:

Need to be 0c at 925mb don't we

Yes but time and time again I’ve seen that northern edge of freezing rain end up as more sleet and 925 modeled too high, especially if the surface is that cold. There are very few instances that come to mind of freezing rain and 27 in RDU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

Well the good mojo may have stopped. The UK is weaker and warmer. 

prateptype_ukmo-imp.us_ma (2).png

Ukie sucked last storm. Was the furthest south than any other model. I wouldn’t overly stress about it. Euro shows this then maybe we can start to scratch our heads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Is anyone else bothered by this thickness/precip type 12Z GFS map? Typically in the SE the snow line is near 546-7. But this shows snow with thicknesses well over 552! How can this be? This is so odd! Can anyone explain this? I’d be highly suspicious of precip types on this.

 

I haven't looked at soundings to confirm this but it could be an elevated warm layer skewing the thickness values. Warm in the sense of relative to expected, but still isothermal. This is a snippet from Meteorologist Jeff Haby's page explaining. He's using 540 but I'm sure the same would apply to the general rule of 546 in the south. "For example, WAA can occur between 800 and 650 millibars, which causes the temperature in that layer to increase and thus results in the thickness increasing above 540. If the temperature between the surface and 650 millibars continues to stay below freezing, the precipitation will fall as snow." 

http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/97/

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...