Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,751
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Fuji Kapesta
    Newest Member
    Fuji Kapesta
    Joined

January 5-6 Thing Storm Obs


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, 87storms said:

Yea, I saw that part and got hyped lol, but I was mostly looking at the precip amounts and Euro still seemed farther south with the 0.5" line than the GFS/Nam.  Agree with the rest.

I think across the board ALL the guidance was a bit overdone and the storm just ended up dryer and weaker than they depicted.  The places winning with 8-10" were the places the guidance was spitting out crazy 16" totals!  Across the board most places are going to end up under what the guidance was showing.  It happens.  

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scraff said:

Damn. This band might be producing best snows of the day here in HoCo. It’s like the perfect scene outside right now. Stupid me cleared the cars off for apparently no reason. :lol:

I'm lurking in the thread.  Originally from Baltimore but live in N NH now.  I use the leafblower to clear our cars if the temperature is below around 28F.   The fluff later will blow right off.  Enjoy.  Meanwhile mostly bare ground up here.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Every forecast I saw including mine, had that max down near DC and points southeast.  I had it SLIGHTLY too far north but not by that much.  The real bust was in the banding just north of there associated with the H7 forcing, the models expected there to be more overlap and have those two features connected, in reality the H7 band pushed up way into central PA and left a huge dead zone in between the h85fgen zone that hit DC south and the banding up in PA.  That killed a lot of MD.  This was missed by the euro also which had 6-8" across northern MD.  

Correct me if I'm totally off base here, but wasn't the Euro kind of showing that 700mb band setting up across central PA back Friday night/Sat? See the Jan 4 00z run below. And then as a compounding factor, perhaps the precipitation depiction was just not as accurate up that way because of how dry the antecedent airmass was?

ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_frzn_neus_21.thumb.png.0f24a52df629ea63f43e897bbae4b619.png

ecmwf_temp_adv_fgen_700_neus_22.thumb.png.e173132cd25df72b57b9d5479fc3cb84.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

ecmwf-deterministic-md-total_snow_kuchera-6337600.thumb.png.0915b62bca3e6bbd732a4f52573da709.png

The euro was giving you 9" yesterday!  It busted just as bad as the GFS across MD.  Now if you are talking about the time period around 72-100 hours when the GFS has a few runs where it had the axis of heaviest snow way up in PA yea that was way off...but before that the euro had a few runs it tried to cut, then a run it went way too far south and washed out, we can go back and forth.  Overall the euro was better I am not denying that.  But both the Euro and GFS yesterday showed similar snowfall across MD and they both busted.   

Whats the 10:1 map look like? I feel like everyone was using Kuchera or whatever map gave the most snow. I've rarely seen high ratio snows in central MD. Looking at the euro precip map, most of MD is in a .5-.75" band. To me, that tracks with what we've seen. I've got over 6" in Howard County and its still snowing.

image.thumb.png.f89d88efc72bfa30621db284833d3aa6.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I think across the board ALL the guidance was a bit overdone and the storm just ended up dryer and weaker than they depicted.  The places winning with 8-10" were the places the guidance was spitting out crazy 16" totals!  Across the board most places are going to end up under what the guidance was showing.  It happens.  

I think we all also got a little fast and loose with the Kuchera ratios.  Usually Kuchera gives us less than 10:1 so we mostly ignore it:lol:.  This time it was >10:1 and we bought that too much.  I'd guess my total precipitation amount is not far off the ~0.5" the 12z Euro and 3k Nam gave me yesterday.  Nearest PWS actually has 0.49" and it's clogged with snow (hasn't updated in awhile).  Think we just ignored that most of this morning stuff would be ~10:1.  

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TSG said:

Correct me if I'm totally off base here, but wasn't the Euro kind of showing that 700mb band setting up across central PA back Friday night/Sat? See the Jan 4 00z run below. And then as a compounding factor, perhaps the precipitation depiction was just not as accurate up that way because of how dry the antecedent airmass was?

ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_frzn_neus_21.thumb.png.0f24a52df629ea63f43e897bbae4b619.png

ecmwf_temp_adv_fgen_700_neus_22.thumb.png.e173132cd25df72b57b9d5479fc3cb84.png

It was moving it around run to run, as was the Hrrr and GFS, and I was actually concerned this split might happen because there were some runs that did this, but didn't want to deb up the thread leading into the storm.  But the last 24 hours or so it was showing good banding with high ratios across the MD line area, as were most of the other CAM and global models.  Yes there were "hints" this would happen, I noted a couple odd runs on the HRRR that showed this split scenario, and I think a run of the HRDERPS showed it correct, but it was never the majority depiction run to run across any guidance so it was easy for me to just keep it in the back of my mind but not worry about it too much.  But these kinds of things are delicate and difficult to pin down.  It's simple when you have a more amplified wave with a larger more expansive and uniform CCB induced precip shield.  But these weaker waves where most of the heavy snowfall is depending on banding in specific forcing drive regions are more difficult to predict and you get more fluky variance.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

I think we all also got a little fast and loose with the Kuchera ratios.  Usually Kuchera gives us less than 10:1 so we mostly ignore it:lol:.  This time it was >10:1 and we bought that too much.  I'd guess my total precipitation amount is not far off the ~0.5" the 12z Euro and 3k Nam gave me yesterday.  Nearest PWS actually has 0.49" and it's clogged with snow (hasn't updated in awhile).  Think we just ignored that most of this morning stuff would be ~10:1.  

It had D.C. consistently over .8" qpf. That did not happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...