Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,798
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

2025 foothills Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

For the first time this storm, the HRRR has a band of snow hitting us tomorrow morning. 

ref1km_ptype.us_ma (19).png

It's hard for me to believe that we won't have some moisture develop once the energy sneaks up and under the SW MTNS. I can't recall a storm tracking across the N.Gulf with a good look shield of precip that just dries up as it moves east. The models obviously see something, but still it's hard for me to believe.

Op

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 minutes ago, WXNewton said:

It's hard for me to believe that we won't have some moisture develop once the energy sneaks up and under the SW MTNS. I can't recall a storm tracking across the N.Gulf with a good look shield of precip that just dries up as it moves east. The models obviously see something, but still it's hard for me to believe.

Op

Problem is - there’s two major inhibitors for gulf moisture transport to WNC:

- the original low dying out and transferring to the Atlantic is bound to leave a dry slot somewhere. We rarely benefit from a west to east transfer. 
 

- several models are hinting at robust convection in the gulf, cutting off our already limited gulf feed. I think THIS is the wildcard. Those storms or lack thereof can mean the difference between getting blanked or having a huge shocker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BooneWX said:

3k has a good handle on this imo. It sees the sinking air east of the apps. I don’t think this is only a foothills issue. I could see areas under winter storm warnings in the triad getting blanked too.

3K gives me 2 inches from that persistent band and about to give us round 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

3k has a good handle on this imo. It sees the sinking air east of the apps. I don’t think this is only a foothills issue. I could see areas under winter storm warnings in the triad getting blanked too.

It's not a great setup for the foothills. It's a combo of this being a west to east type system (Due to the blocky NH pattern) before the Atlantic SLP takes over. So you get a bit of downsloping to start (dry/warm air) and once the column is saturated, the dynamics are shifting east towards the Atlantic SLP. They wont strike out though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM was much more muted than recent runs with convection in the gulf. That’s the wildcard tomorrow and why I think some models are so paltry and some are much improved. 
 

@HKY_WXremind me - isn’t there a rule for the orientation of those storms in the Gulf? Some setups enhance moisture transport to the north while others choke it off?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BooneWX said:

The NAM was much more muted than recent runs with convection in the gulf. That’s the wildcard tomorrow and why I think some models are so paltry and some are much improved. 
 

@HKY_WXremind me - isn’t there a rule for the orientation of those storms in the Gulf? Some setups enhance moisture transport to the north while others choke it off?

A mesoscale thunderstorm complex in the GOM can throw off the models. In that it can cause convective feedback upstream and lead to a gap in moisture coverage vs reality. Of course the inverse can be possible as well if the models aren't anticipating it. Whereas in overrunning (Isentropic) lift scenarios, once a storm starts up it can cause the models to self correct once they start factoring in downstream moisture advection. When these systems start to form over TX/LA area you often see the models start to self-correct and increase totals in SC/NC/VA. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

The NAM was much more muted than recent runs with convection in the gulf. That’s the wildcard tomorrow and why I think some models are so paltry and some are much improved. 
 

@HKY_WXremind me - isn’t there a rule for the orientation of those storms in the Gulf? Some setups enhance moisture transport to the north while others choke it off?

You want a positive orientation, I.e. the orientation of hwy 64 between Morganton and Lenior.  Basically funnel that moisture up to usz

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

I have been scouring every piece of data I can find and they have all increased moisture from last nights runs. 

One of the biggest things I have noticed is the models want to set up a band near or over the escarpment. 

Something to watch going forward today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...