Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,748
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    snown91
    Newest Member
    snown91
    Joined

The January 5/6 Thing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

I still cannot believe south of 64 still has an outside chance for a significant snowfall. I feel like the gfs actually took a step toward the euro and Ukie. I’m fully expecting ice but would be a nice surprise if we could thump out of the gate before thermals get warm upstairs. 

I hope everyone from Salem to Richmond to DC & surrounding areas cash out. This is what we all need. 

  • Like 6
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RVAman said:

I hope everyone from Salem to Richmond to DC & surrounding areas cash out. This is what we all need. 

I’m hoping the same. It must be a tough forecast for our local Mets. I’m thinking we will do fairly well I have a good feeling this will overperform for us. The CAD west of the blueridge is always underestimated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those that still don't like the Srefs, I  have even more bad news for you. And there's maybe .1" more snow in places on the latest run after the map I used here, but I  had to use the 78hrs to compare with the 84hrs on the last run.

The storm is a few hours slower, which alows it to expand the precip shield i.e. wetter in some locations. A few places may have been cut back, but those localized reductions will just have to be taken for the team.

trend-srefens-2025010321-f081.sn10_acc-mean-imp.us_ma.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

WB 21Z NBM, I know it is a blend of other previous runs....

IMG_4727.png

Just in case anyone was wondering, the purpose for the NBM. As we know, most model suites have their ensembles at lower resolution. NBM was conceived to take operational models for the most part and use them as an ensemble suite. It makes sense since the operationals have the highest resolution. This was told to me on Phillywx by Rainshadow, who retired from NWS Philly a few years ago.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case anyone was wondering, the purpose for the NBM. As we know, most model suites have their ensembles at lower resolution. NBM was conceived to take operational models for the most part and use them as an ensemble suite. It makes sense since the operationals have the highest resolution. This was told to me on Phillywx by Rainshadow, who retired from NWS Philly a few years ago.

I know many tend to hug the snowiest for their backyard, but a blend of all of the major OPs makes total sense for actual forecasting purposes. If GFS / NAM also go south tonight and euro holds serve, that’s when I’ll be a smidge worried for Baltimore & north. And by “worried” I mean 4-6” instead of 8-12”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Just in case anyone was wondering, the purpose for the NBM. As we know, most model suites have their ensembles at lower resolution. NBM was conceived to take operational models for the most part and use them as an ensemble suite. It makes sense since the operationals have the highest resolution. This was told to me on Phillywx by Rainshadow, who retired from NWS Philly a few years ago.

The NBM is a very useful tool for forecasting when you know how to interpret it and understand its biases. I've been keeping an eye on it and it's been pretty great with handling the swings and limiting the crazy max/min variance from run to run the past few days. It'll be interesting once the CAMs start getting incorporated. That will be a useful way to seeing some of the proposed banding being forecast. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...