Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,785
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Olijax993
    Newest Member
    Olijax993
    Joined

The January 5/6 Thing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

As far as recent 1-5 day verification performance goes:

500mb heights: Euro is top, CMC very close second, GFS distant third

850mb temps: Euro top, CMC and GFS are about the same

Did not check ensembles. 

GFS is usually just bad in -NAO/+PNA patterns.  The fast Pac has probably prevented it from verifying even worse as it might be playing into its bias somewhat but usually the blockier the pattern is the more likely the CMC/Euro are going to be better than the GFS and its been that way for awhile

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

Hmm.  Interesting

What’s interesting is that GFS performance really nosedives on some specific periods (1-2 days) and then gets back in line with the CMC and Euro, which have smaller dips. I haven’t checked, but my hunch is that the GFS struggles mightily with highly dynamic storms and/or major pattern shifts.  Would have to do some reanalysis to back this up, but it’s getting late :) 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can tell it's been a while since everyone has tracked a real dynamic storm around these parts - these model battles are half the fun. 

Quite literally a day ago - the GFS has the shortwave strung out and open and now we're looking at a 2 contour closed off low at H5 before the transfer to the coast. That's a considerable amount of variability within the ML evolution within a 24-36 hour window. It's going to happen. 

Until the CMC/Euro/Ukie camp begins to show a similar shift in regards to strength + ML warm nose - I will side with the models who have not wavered much over the last day or so versus the one playing catch up. GFS could definitely catch a win here, but there's no need to freak out about an event starting in 72 hours. 

Side Note: I am wondering if a couple inches up north (Metro into PA) with staying power into Sunday could help bring things down a degree or two at the sfc. I am noticing a band of slightly cooler temps along wherever the GFS sets up its maxima for tomorrow's squalls. It's slight but we'll take the help.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

What’s interesting is that GFS performance really nosedives on some specific periods (1-2 days) and then gets back in line with the CMC and Euro, which have smaller dips. I haven’t checked, but my hunch is that the GFS struggles mightily with highly dynamic storms and/or major pattern shifts.  Would have to do some reanalysis to back this up, but it’s getting late :) 

Well I will admit that I do love when mets are willing to toss the GFS.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clskinsfan said:

Well I will admit that I do love when mets are willing to toss the GFS.

Even the worst model for snow (gfs) for your area is about 6". Other are a foot or more. You're in a great spot

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will have the cold air in place to start, however, no re-enforcing cold source to funnel in. Pattern like this is for a front end thump in WAA which is our best shot. A good thump before the warmer air takes over. The stronger the low is to our west the faster the warm air takes over and then dry slot. Like threading a needle. I think the solutions with the stout CAD may be overdone a bit. Dynamic system which the GFS can have trouble locking in a solution like this. NAM, though at extended range is showing hints of more icing which in a La Niña is more climatologically favorable in a synoptic pattern like this.


.

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deck Pic said:

It's pretty hilarious.  I hope the NYC forum see this

As far as us.  I'd rather flirt with disaster than take a dry storm.  But I live in DC and we suck at snow.

 

image.thumb.png.925652d6d5a14ddf0080a322b33ee9d7.png

DC gets 6” in both ‘extreme’ solutions on UK and GFS.  We’re a snow town bro. ;) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ers-wxman1 said:

We will have the cold air in place to start, however, no re-enforcing cold source to funnel in. Pattern like this is for a front end thump in WAA which is our best shot. A good thump before the warmer air takes over. The stronger the low is to our west the faster the warm air takes over and then dry slot. Like threading a needle. I think the solutions with the stout CAD may be overdone a bit. Dynamic system which the GFS can have trouble locking in a solution like this. NAM, though at extended range is showing hints of more icing which in a La Niña is more climatologically favorable in a synoptic pattern like this.


.

IMG_7090.thumb.png.694c9e275c8432b8874535a7481bee2a.png

While we don’t have the typical cold high to the north, we do have northerly flow from Canada down to the upper mid Atlantic thanks to the TPV to the NE. I think it effectively serves the same function as a cold high would. But this system is so dynamic that any northward shift would basically shut us out of any significant accumulation, and favor more icing. I’m just hoping that doesn’t happen, but you could be right. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guidance will be all over the place with this until 36-48 hours out. A west to east track is not the best for heavy snow for our region, however, the strong WAA riding over the cold air initially is our best shot at accumulating snow. It’s dynamic system so the guidance will have issues.


.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 2
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ers-wxman1 said:

We will have the cold air in place to start, however, no re-enforcing cold source to funnel in. Pattern like this is for a front end thump in WAA which is our best shot. A good thump before the warmer air takes over. The stronger the low is to our west the faster the warm air takes over and then dry slot. Like threading a needle. I think the solutions with the stout CAD may be overdone a bit. Dynamic system which the GFS can have trouble locking in a solution like this. NAM, though at extended range is showing hints of more icing which in a La Niña is more climatologically favorable in a synoptic pattern like this.


.

Good to hear from you again, even if it’s not amazing news! Always appreciate your constitutions 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nj2va said:

DC gets 6” in both ‘extreme’ solutions on UK and GFS.  We’re a snow town bro. ;) 

I think a lot of these snow maps are overdone based on the sleet/fzrn potentials. Feeling like 3-4" on a front end thump to snizzle is our low bar for the dc area. If the cold can hang on or get some coastal enhancement, those numbers can bump up. Probably some lollys in the favored higher elevation areas. 

The good news is whatever falls will be sticking around for awhile! Also the mountains look to cash in regardless, so we have options :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...