Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,722
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rosented1234
    Newest Member
    Rosented1234
    Joined

January Medium/Long Range: A snowy January ahead?


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, mattie g said:

Not the 10th/11th thing. It’s a classic jumper that runs from the Gulf into the Ohio Valley and then transfers to the coast.

Yessir. Nearly all coastals are hybrids in the sense that slp jumps the coast/redevelops even with the majority of Miller As.  Jan 2000 was a straight up coastal tracker but those are super rare. Otherwise, the handoff is present nearly all the time. 

In my simple mind, any storm that is juicy west of the MS River and tracks entirely south of us is a Miller A. No big lull or weird weaken b4 strengthen again stuff. Just a trackable blob of precip that consistently leaves bigger totals in its wake as it marches NE. 

Miller Bs comes in all shapes and sizes. Jan 2016 was a Miller B if you count where it comes from. It was a NS shortwave that hit the pac NW. Just took an insanely good track and never wobbled in strength much. I personally look at Jan 2016 more as a Miller A but it's debatable 

I no longer like the Miller A/B debate. We know what works and what doesn't and the lines between them are way too muddy to have 2 simple buckets 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, mappy said:

lol except I’m in Syracuse mid week and to drive home Saturday :lol:

I am driving down that Sunday. Maybe I should put a plow on the front of the car. And, apparently, I have to drive 500 miles south to get any snow in this pattern. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Honestly tho yall...this is a pretty damn good spot to be in at this point.  Seriously

Right.  It's about all we can expect right now at this range.  The threat in general has shown up for a little while, and I recall you mentioning (some pages back) that the "players were on the field but a lot going on" (or words to that effect).  Maybe it's trying to hone in on a more discrete threat now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frd said:

That would be a typical failure on several fronts.  

Seems we are going to avoid extreme cold, as the PV getting deflected.  

https://x.com/RyanMaue/status/1875357476503351668

Pacific pattern has really evolved in the last few days to now a -PNA/+WPO look for the storm. The pacific pattern takes precedence as effect over the Atlantic, as the last 10+ years have shown clearly.  Beyond that, it evolves to an Aleutian ridge. That's a -PNA pattern, with now a trough digging into the NW in the long range. Will be interesting to see if this favorable Pacific only lasts a few more days like what is being modeled. Models were super cold for the time period a short time ago, it was a question of if the 11th storm would merge with the Polar Vortex lol

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

There’s no real high pressure to the north though thanks to that northern stream shortwave. Kinda relying on the confluence and antecedent airmass. So bigger chance for mixing and rain if the coastal doesn’t take over to our south.

Kind of hoping that the cold air from before stays in place for the storm.. -NAO block is gone now, neutral, with some lingering ridging over Canada. I've seen this play before, it evolves toward the upper latitude pattern in the coming days. The +WPO Canadian ridge is going to extend south and kind of cutoff the cold air, unless it evolves away from +WPO in the coming days..

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...