Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,722
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rosented1234
    Newest Member
    Rosented1234
    Joined

January 4-6th Winter Storm


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, CIllinoisSnow said:

12z Euro seems to have upped snow totals some thru South/Central Illinois compared to the 0z, looks to be a touch north as well

Still pretty far south compared to other models esp regarding the heaviest band. Seems closer to I70 whereas other models are more I72. But nice to see precip shield extending north. Dry air worries me though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Radtechwxman said:

Still pretty far south compared to other models esp regarding the heaviest band. Seems closer to I70 whereas other models are more I72. But nice to see precip shield extending north. Dry air worries me though. 

That definitely worries me as well being on the northern edge. At least it didn’t go any further south. I’ll take any small victory I can get haha

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From ILX. To me this is the dumbest way to word a Winter Storm Warning. Is the public really more responsive to probabilities? Just tell me how much snow to expect.

WINTER STORM WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FROM MIDNIGHT TONIGHT TO
NOON CST MONDAY...

* WHAT...Heavy snow likely near and south of a Beardstown to Paris
  line. A high confidence (80% chance) of at least 6 inches of snow.
  A medium confidence (40% chance) of at least 12 inches of snow.
  Blowing snow likely with wind gusts up to 35 mph. Mixed
  precipitation possible. A low confidence (30% chance) of at least
  one tenth of an inch of ice near and south of US Highway 50.

* WHERE...Heavy snowfall across portions of central, east central,
  southeast, and west central Illinois. Freezing rain and ice
  accumulation confined to areas near and south of US Highway 50
  across southeast Illinois.

* WHEN...From midnight tonight to noon CST Monday.

* IMPACTS...Travel could be very difficult. Areas of blowing snow
  could significantly reduce visibility. The hazardous conditions
  will impact the Monday morning commute.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, fluoronium said:

It's hard to get anything done when there are new models to view lol. Today's runs have given some hope for us in the Peoria area, but man what a devastating cutoff on the north side.

Dude you have no idea. Lol. I'm hella stressed. I'm in north Peoria and models like hrrr/rap have me nervous because cutoff could be I74. Nam gave me a little hope. Euro still so south. Gfs holding north. No idea what to expect here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Radtechwxman said:

Dude you have no idea. Lol. I'm hella stressed. I'm in north Peoria and models like hrrr/rap have me nervous because cutoff could be I74. Nam gave me a little hope. Euro still so south. Gfs holding north. No idea what to expect here. 

I feel ya, i’m in the same boat, I’m back at home for Christmas Break about 30ish miles north of Champaign and the cutoff is insane, a 20 mile shift north/south could mean the difference between nothing and the biggest snowfall i’ve had since Feb 2022, we’re gonna be stressing it out together lol

Will be interested very soon when we can start seeing actual observations and comparing them to the modeling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I figured, Stebo.  Thank you.  
https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/144/4/mwr-d-15-0242.1.xml

The RAP is 13 km resolution, vs. 9km for the ECMWF, and 12km for the GFS and NAM, of the most commonly cited non-CAM guidance. The GDPS (GGEM) is run at 15km resolution and the RDPS (RGEM) is run at 10 km resolution. Finally, the UKMET is at 10 km resolution.

What makes the extended RAP runs more prone to errors is that it's a hot start, hourly updating model with radar reflectivity as part of its data assimilation. This is just like the HRRR (which is initialized with RAP data) is more prone to errors in extended ranges.

Think of the outer ranges of the RAP like days out on the ECMWF and GFS and beyond 24-36 hours out on the NAM. The RAP/HRRR can be right beyond 12 hours out, but in general they're more likely to be reliable within 12 hours, and even more so within 6 hours.




  • Like 4
  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CIllinoisSnow said:

I feel ya, i’m in the same boat, I’m back at home for Christmas Break about 30ish miles north of Champaign and the cutoff is insane, a 20 mile shift north/south could mean the difference between nothing and the biggest snowfall i’ve had since Feb 2022, we’re gonna be stressing it out together lol

Will be interested very soon when we can start seeing actual observations and comparing them to the modeling 

Definitely going to be a lot of nowcasting tomorrow with this one

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CIllinoisSnow said:

Been noticing an area of lower totals that have been continuing to show up on multiple models now in East/NE Illinois, anyone know the reason that could be? Perhaps significant dry air getting into the system that models are picking up on? 

Yeah it's the dry ne fetch around periphery of arctic high. Eating into the snow. The precip is going into saturating the column instead of falling to ground. The more north you are the drier the air and harder/longer it will be to precipitate. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Chicago Storm changed the title to January 4-6th Winter Storm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...