Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,684
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Szaquli
    Newest Member
    Szaquli
    Joined

Winter 2024/2025 January Thread


AMZ8990
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, *Flash* said:

I like it. Middle TN north of 40 is outside looking in at this point but positive trends are my friends. That said, if I have to throw in the trowel, I want E Ten peeps to be in the trowal. 

We're still a good ways out and the biggest NW trends usually fall inside the final 48 hours. I wouldn't give up yet. I'm still somewhat worried about a cutter or runner. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gfs and CMC on 2 different planets with the evolution at 500. GFS opened 500 door wide open for a cutter...if it evolved that way, may get a quick front end (believe if anything would be quick change to some ice then rain). Would be rooting for the beginning of the week (CMC), than taking any chance with the end of the week.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, nrgjeff said:

The PWAT charts above do not kill Tennessee snow chances. Remember snow, especially dry snow, carries very little liquid compared to rain. I hope central Mississippi can score. It's even more magical in the Deep South.

Then I want to get TROWAL'ed over here in East Tenn. TROWAL me! Talk dirty to me.

That is true, but I also know that drier snow equals to lower snow ratios as well. If that Low can shift just right, could very well see snow in Central MS, but I am not just not completely sold on it. I should have added the QPF totals as it was showing the cut off of the precip right at Central MS.
 

I am still watching the system but not getting excited by what I have seen. Might also have to watch for temps in the 925 to 700 mb range in case warm area over runs the front and then it some of the precip could be sleet/freezing rain event. I think there is a lot of uncertainty for Central MS at the moment in what will happen but it looks like the other areas I have mentioned are going to be the main focus for this event. 
 

Will have to see what happens. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From just a pure model watching standpoint, it seems like we've had a lot of trouble this winter from models struggling with speed and evolution of shortwaves in the NW flow over western ridges. It happened with the storm last week:

giphy.gif

 

The timing, press, number, trajectories, and evolution of these shortwaves is just giving NWP fits, even right up to go time. 

 

giphy.gif

 

See above. We have a nice STJ but it just gets squished by those stout shortwaves to the north, more times than not. If one of those can drop down and tap into it it'll have a lot of juice, as some recent model runs have shown, but models just cannot seem to resolve those shortwaves at any sort of range. 

Kind of a weird, twitchy gif here, but just give it a watch:

giphy.gif

 

Notice how between 50 and 100 hours the GFS (just chosen for ease of use on TT) does a pretty good job with the longwave features. Big ridges, big troughs are fairly stable. But now look closer at the individual vorts in those ridges and troughs. They are jumping around a lot. Add that weird cutoff mess off the CA coast and you have model problems with finer details. 

We often talk about better obs and data from the RAOB network and yeah, we 100% have much better satellite data than at any time in the past, but even with better data (and I don't know if there are other non-public satellites at play here) some of the sat. imagery just isn't as...continuous? over the polar region:

giphy.gif

It's probably hard to have a sat. in geosynchronous orbit there, to be fair, but that can't be helping resolving shortwaves north of the arctic circle, can it? And you can't tell me that is as crisp and clean and detailed as good old GOES 17, 18, 19, or even the Himawari 9:

giphy.gif

 

I'm not advocating for a bust or boom next week here, but offering an explanation for some of the model frustration.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For NE TN peeps we are going to have to root for this to move northwest a bunch.  Ensembles have this buried (I mean absolutely buried).  I think the 0z GFS run was a one-off.   I think the 6z GFS is still probably too amped.  The GFS has a little bit of NAM in it at range.  Everything is too amplified.  I would be really surprised if this is a forum wide event.  I think this is going to be a SE TN event, non-event, or E TN event in that order.  It is that suppressed on ensembles.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, matt9697 said:

All of Middle TN looked good on the last two runs of the GFS

Ensembles barely graze areas north of 40.  There is almost zero support for frozen precip north of 40 right now on ensembles.  It is possible that operationals are leading the way.  I certainly can see that is possible.  But the the ensemble mean is waaaaaay down there.  I would really caution using the GFS right now.  It was woefully wrong with the last system, and is on a total island with this next one.  I hope it is right.  That means I get to see winter one last time before a possible much AN February.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is how much the GFS is on an island.  The 0z Euro AIFS doesn't even have the system above Mobile, Alabama.  There are really two impulses.  There is one on the 21st-ish and next on the 24th-ish.  Modeling is probably struggling with which one to amp.   But on the AIFS, neither are there.  Again, looking at ensembles, we are going to need to see those ensembles begin to move today or this one is gonna be tough to reel in.

Overall in the long range, it looks like we take a TBD big-time warm-up after next week.  The GEFS ext MJO ends winter for all but the northern most latitudes of the forum and higher elevations.  The Euro Weeklies race across warm phases and then stall before hitting phase 8 of the MJO.   We want the Euro to be right.  Otherwise, things are going to be blooming by the end of February.  When we start talking about the MJO, usually that means we are about to see extended warmth.  I suspect that seasonal analogs(almost all are warm for Feb) are correct in February being much AN with March cooling back off.  Chance for a little late season magic if analogs are correct for March.  

So far, the 2018 analog has been money.  I had it as one of two analogs for my winter forecast.   2017 was the other.  

The one fly(a good one) in the ointment for February could be the PDO flipping.  If it flips, it will try to trump the MJO and has the ability to do so.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...