Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 2025


Monmouth_County_Jacpot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Since we're loosely using relatively light snowfall ranges in Central Park in December as an indicator of snowfall likelihood for the entire winter, there's a risk that inconsistent measurements in the Park skew that sort of analysis.

I get the idea of consistency with different Pacific patterns, but I'm not sold on the idea of Central Park snowfall as a proxy.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as we pass the 3rd or so, we probably do enter a pretty damn favorable pattern with -EPO/-NAO and a strong signal for N ATL confluence that will help press storms to the south alongside ample cold air. there's even a hint of sagginess off Baja California indicating a somewhat active STJ. overall, this presents the chance of phasing potential over the OH / MS valleys with 50/50 confluence in place

now, the strength and character of the -NAO still needs to be worked out, as this will dictate the confluence... this isn't a shoe in and there is still time for things to change, of course. I would like to see this look persist towards NYE. it's relatively high confidence overall

regardless of if you're pessimistic or optimistic, objectively, this should be our best shot at seeing a larger snowstorm since Feb 2021

Untitled.thumb.png.94bb94b156290ec9500b8390cebf11d4.png

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brooklynwx99 said:

as we pass the 3rd or so, we probably do enter a pretty damn favorable pattern with -EPO/-NAO and a strong signal for N ATL confluence that will help press storms to the south alongside ample cold air. there's even a hint of sagginess off Baja California indicating a somewhat active STJ. overall, this presents the chance of phasing potential over the OH / MS valleys with 50/50 confluence in place

now, the strength and character of the -NAO still needs to be worked out, as this will dictate the confluence... this isn't a shoe in and there is still time for things to change, of course. I would like to see this look persist towards NYE. it's relatively high confidence overall

regardless of if you're pessimistic or optimistic, objectively, this should be our best shot at seeing a larger snowstorm since Feb 2021

Untitled.thumb.png.94bb94b156290ec9500b8390cebf11d4.png

 

Reasons for optimism for sure. Still not a classic pattern for a KU. Maybe some smaller to moderate events which we take. But I’m not seeing anything which is favorable for a MECS. 
 

Hopefully we can get a few weeks of real winter in January. I am not expecting any big storms for the metro/coast, but I think some smaller events are on the table. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, psv88 said:

Reasons for optimism for sure. Still not a classic pattern for a KU. Maybe some smaller to moderate events which we take. But I’m not seeing anything which is favorable for a MECS. 
 

Hopefully we can get a few weeks of real winter in January. I am not expecting any big storms for the metro/coast, but I think some smaller events are on the table. 

It does seem like January 2009 would be a good analog, smaller events but long duration snow cover with the cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

It does seem like January 2009 would be a good analog, smaller events but long duration snow cover with the cold.

I would sign up for 2009 in a heartbeat that was a really good January up here. The winter as a whole ended up with 42 inches in my hometown then of Norwalk.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, psv88 said:

Reasons for optimism for sure. Still not a classic pattern for a KU. Maybe some smaller to moderate events which we take. But I’m not seeing anything which is favorable for a MECS. 
 

Hopefully we can get a few weeks of real winter in January. I am not expecting any big storms for the metro/coast, but I think some smaller events are on the table. 

Eh I think that could work as a serviceable “Mexy” setup even to the coast.  The Aleutian low and -EPO is what has me paying the most attention since the PAC has ruined all things holy during these past few winters.

Best look I’ve seen in a few years though.  I def have more confidence in this than last year’s Feb rugpull.  Still a ways out though, so not worth focusing on the deets this early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, psv88 said:

Reasons for optimism for sure. Still not a classic pattern for a KU. Maybe some smaller to moderate events which we take. But I’m not seeing anything which is favorable for a MECS. 
 

Hopefully we can get a few weeks of real winter in January. I am not expecting any big storms for the metro/coast, but I think some smaller events are on the table. 

The pattern might be ripe for a big storm in January .

50/50 lows

Mjo going into 7 and 8

Negative NAO and AO

Positive PNA

  • Like 3
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GFS and CMC don't look great out through fantasyland. Enemble spread and run-to-run changes as usual offer some hope. The 0z ECM was different and a little more encouraging IMO so 12z will be interesting.

A recurring problem I see with Twitter forecasters is they equate modeled negative (blue) 500mb height anomalies with snow. Unfortunately for us coastal plainers, we need more than blue height anomalies at day 10, +PNA, -NAO, favorable MJO etc. We also need very lucky shortwave timing and interaction. Outside the mountainous regions, no snow is always more likely than snow, regardless of the so-called "pattern." That's why the Twitter hype fails far more often than it succeeds. Unfortunately most Twitter Mets overrate their own prognostic abilities and have a poor instinctive sense of bayesian statistics.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eduggs said:

12z GFS and CMC don't look great out through fantasyland. Enemble spread and run-to-run changes as usual offer some hope. The 0z ECM was different and a little more encouraging IMO so 12z will be interesting.

A recurring problem I see with Twitter forecasters is they equate modeled negative (blue) 500mb height anomalies with snow. Unfortunately for us coastal plainers, we need more than blue height anomalies at day 10, +PNA, -NAO, favorable MJO etc. We also need very lucky shortwave timing and interaction. Outside the mountainous regions, no snow is always more likely than snow, regardless of the so-called "pattern." That's why the Twitter hype fails far more often than it succeeds. Unfortunately most Twitter Mets overrate their own prognostic abilities and have a poor instinctive sense of bayesian statistics.

Still chasing the same carrot out past 300 hours 

 

none of these op runs fwiw look that great inside 7 days 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...