Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,752
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Fuji Kapesta
    Newest Member
    Fuji Kapesta
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Chris78 said:

I'm on the M/D and I'm good with this run.

So many damn times confluence has weekened as we close in on game time that we get missed to the north. Don't want it to drop further south but having a little wiggle room isn't bad.

Still 6 days out.

^ This 100%.  

4” in Hagerstown and 8” in Martinsburg is a great storm at the front end of a cold wave.  I would sign for this in a heartbeat.

The previous runs of the ECMWF showed so much more QPF than all the other models.  I expected a correction.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Max was over DC at 0z and over Fredericksburg now? That’s essentially an identical solution for D6. Caveat that I haven’t looked at anything besides @NorthArlington101’s snowmap.

This x100!  It’s 150 hours. A shift like that is noise. There is no way to know exactly where the sharp northern edge will be due to confluence at this range.  The euro still has a healthy storm. That’s what matters. 

  • Like 6
  • 100% 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

oh yeah, I'm not in panic or worry mode...not even close.  I think we score, but prob not a foot, lol

I'm panicked.  It will move north and by Sunday night i will be looking at 1.1" of euro snow map grey.  This far out I need to see the max snow down over Cuba to feel safe about the north trend.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

There is obviously more to it than timing (maybe @CAPE's jet stream lift?) but the CMC and EURO really look the same in a lot of ways... just depends on the thumpiness of the thump and EURO being ~12 hours quicker. EURO still collapses/shreds when it gets closer to the coast.

image.thumb.png.88fb7987a0e1569e6ea83d4a114c1316.png

It de-amplifies a bit more than the 0z run as it comes east. A secondary low pops offshore. The confluence/convergence upstairs on the sw side of that NA vortex is going to have some impact. We want just enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

This x100!  It’s 150 hours. A shift like that is noise. There is no way to know exactly where the sharp northern edge will be due to confluence at this range.  The euro still has a healthy storm. That’s what matters. 

How many times have we seen things juice up a tad within D3? I like what the CMC/Euro/ICON is advertising upstairs.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been busy at work so just now getting a chance to assess things. So far there is still significant spread with the handling of the 5H pattern across the North Atlantic with the extension hanging back into the Northeastern U.S. @CAPE pointed out earlier some of the appreciable differences upstairs with a touch more phasing of N/S energy extending back to Canada leading to a stronger axis of confluence and shearing of the primary 5H shortwave progression out of the Mississippi Valley. One positive take from the GFS was a better precip shield developing across the Mid-South, something that had been missing in previous runs. This makes sense considering the stronger closed 5H vorticity and subsequent 500mb LER jet dynamics accompanying the trough. There's likely to be shearing as a result of the cyclonic gyre over the North Atlantic, but we'll have to see if this is a case of Medium Range bias in over amplifying the 5H Relative Vorticity evolution as can be the case within these D4+ leads. I do feel the analysis of the eventual trough in the plains and Tennessee Valley will be solved a little faster given the time frame the energy reaches the CONUS and becomes a factor in cyclogenesis is <72 hrs in progression, so the fact that has trended favorably is a step in the right direction. 

Deterministic output has been shotgun spray when it comes to the final QPF within that D6-8 time frame as each global displays a different prog meaning there's very much variability in this pattern. These types of setups tend to lean further north due to the bias of over amplification of the downstream 5H evolution noted above, but that doesn't mean that will be the case this time. Ensembles have been pretty useful with regards to the anticipated QPF with the GFS boosting precip within the area over the past 4 runs (See @NorthArlington101 post above) and the other ensembles remains relatively steady with varying QPF magnitudes more noise within the mean. NBM maintains a general 2-4" across much of the sub-forum with the max situated over Central MD back west, a favored climo pattern for storms that run west to east in trajectory. 

I'm curious to look at the cluster analysis and see what differences within the ensemble members give us the best and worse case scenarios along with which cluster has the highest percentile of probable outcomes. Time will tell and until I see something more concrete in either a great or terrible scenario, I have no strong feelings on what has been shown on todays 12z suite. Just my $0.02

  • Like 23
  • Thanks 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

Any post storm(s) bitter  cold graphics?

Thanks. 

I honestly cant remember the last time the Euro had me below freezing for the extended amount of time it did this run. It reminds me of the 1989 cold outbreak. Here are the coldest temps for our area on the run. 

sfct-imp.us_ma.png

 

  • Like 2
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...