Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,634
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    JDClapper
    Newest Member
    JDClapper
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

0z GFS ensembles further SW than the OP with Jan 6 storm threat. We have a good 50/50 low for this

1A-45.gif

Mongolian reload and that region has been consistently producing  for a month.

Now the examples need to get to within 5 days to see if a low is coming up from the south A style. The transfer/phase jobs rarely work here 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WEATHER53 said:

Mongolian reload and that region has been consistently producing  for a month.

Now the examples need to get to within 5 days to see if a low is coming up from the south A style. The transfer/phase jobs rarely work here 

 

Thats what was so beautiful about last nights Euro run. Old school Miller A bomb. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, psuhoffman said:

We’ve identified the threat for every major MECS level snowstorm that hit our area since 2009 past 10 days.  None snuck up on us. We saw the window of opportunity for every one at long range.
 

Dec 2009, Feb 2010x2, Jan 2011, Feb 2014, Jan 2016, March 2018. And we identified some that were really close misses like Boxing Day, Dec 2018, Dec 2020, Feb 2021. No one is saying what any day 10 run is showing is likely to happen. It isn’t. Even if we get a big snow it won’t happen exactly like a day 10 run.  But this is simply about threat identification at this range. And we can and have successfully done that over the last 15 years. 

They don’t sneak up on us. You are completely correct.  But they overforecast  many events that never come to fruition. That’s what brings criticism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

They don’t sneak up on us. You are completely correct.  But they overforecast  many events that never come to fruition. That’s what brings criticism 

But do they are are people reading the tool wrong?   A few years ago I created an objective tool and posted the 50% snowfall forecast from 24 hour cycles of the geps, gefs and eps to show people were interpreting it wrong due to bias.  They get excited about a run that shows snow and ignore the ones that don’t. They also use the mean which is skewed high by a few big snow solutions when the 50% plot snows what it really thinks. 
 

Right now for example based on the last 24 hour cycle we have about a 30% chance of a MECS level or higher snow and about a 50% of SECS. And about a 40% chance we get skunked the next 15 days. The most likely median outcome according to the whole guidance package is 1-4” across the area.  
 

But that’s really good. Having a better than 50% chance of snow in general but more so having a 30% chance at that range of a mecs level event is a rare high probability chance. But it’s still more likely to fail and that’s not the guidance failing that’s people who see the hecs runs and ignore that most don’t actually show that. 
 

At day 10 all we can do is identify threat windows and because we live in a very low snow area many of them will fail.  But we spend most of many winters in periods where there is absolutely no chance of a mecs snow. So having a period with 30% is worth noting imo!  

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...