Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,653
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Skiseeker
    Newest Member
    Skiseeker
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

So when Penix gets hurt tonight and Kirk leads a game winning drive and the gfs, Euro, icon, ukie and cmc all lose the snow and cold pattern you should just save some money and shut down Jay's wintry mix and quit betting on sports. :hurrbear:

You might be 15 days away from never seeing a post from me ever again on this board
  • Haha 5
  • Disagree 1
  • clap 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when Penix gets hurt tonight and Kirk leads a game winning drive and the gfs, Euro, icon, ukie and cmc all lose the snow and cold pattern you should just save some money and shut down Jay's wintry mix and quit betting on sports. :hurrbear:

Tonight has catastrophic potential
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z Euro vs 0z. You can see better ridging north of the Great Lakes at 6z, likely caused by the stronger trough off the east coast, and a slightly weaker vort hitting the NW coast (that's the 1/6 system.) All of that would increase chances of a 6z Gfs scenario imho by pushing a slightly weaker system to the south of its cutter depiction on the Euro's 0z run. Plenty of time to change, and likely with each run until we're closer.

P.s. I don't think the fact the 1/6 system is shown coming in slightly north would make a difference due to stronger ridging north of the GL. Again, jmho.

27199d72-01d5-44de-982e-a09d78e6f351.gif

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

That 00z Euro run was wild.  Over an inch of QPF falling into a deep cold airmass where the surface temps stay <15 degrees during the day.

So wild it’ll probably be gone at 12z lol. Crossing fingers it can still be there. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The strongest signal for a snowstorm across 0z ensemble runs is the EPS for the 10th- and it is a strong signal for this range. A bit of a weaker signal on the 6z GEFS with low pressure more offshore compared to the 0z run.

The 6-7th storm has an initial low to our NW on the majority of members, with secondary development somewhere along the MA coast(Miller B). 

In a nutshell, not much has changed and it is still too early for details.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The strongest signal for a snowstorm across 0z ensemble runs is the EPS for the 10th- and it is a strong signal for this range. A bit of a weaker signal on the 6z GEFS with low pressure more offshore compared to the 0z run.
The 6-7th storm has an initial low to our NW on the majority of members, with secondary development somewhere along the MA coast(Miller B)
In a nutshell, not much has changed and it is still too early for details.

https://x.com/accurayno/status/1873349234919092734?s=46&t=C005pd5HNg3Y-KhVU7n3VA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CAPE said:

The strongest signal for a snowstorm across 0z ensemble runs is the EPS for the 10th- and it is a strong signal for this range. A bit of a weaker signal on the 6z GEFS with low pressure more offshore compared to the 0z run.

The 6-7th storm has an initial low to our NW on the majority of members, with secondary development somewhere along the MA coast(Miller B). 

In a nutshell, not much has changed and it is still too early for details.

I feel disappointment lurking man. I so hope I’m wrong.

  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CAPE said:

The strongest signal for a snowstorm across 0z ensemble runs is the EPS for the 10th- and it is a strong signal for this range. A bit of a weaker signal on the 6z GEFS with low pressure more offshore compared to the 0z run.

The 6-7th storm has an initial low to our NW on the majority of members, with secondary development somewhere along the MA coast(Miller B). 

In a nutshell, not much has changed and it is still too early for details.

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

I feel disappointment lurking man. I so hope I’m wrong.

If you are banking on a HECS level event, then probably. Realistically could have 1 or 2 secs during this period then maybe the reality is our biggest storm happens when the pattern breaks down. At least that's 'normally' how it plays out.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

6z Euro vs 0z. You can see better ridging north of the Great Lakes at 6z, likely caused by the stronger trough off the east coast, and a slightly weaker vort hitting the NW coast (that's the 1/6 system.) All of that would increase chances of a 6z Gfs scenario imho by pushing a slightly weaker system to the south of its cutter depiction on the Euro's 0z run. Plenty of time to change, and likely with each run until we're closer.

P.s. I don't think the fact the 1/6 system is shown coming in slightly north would make a difference due to stronger ridging north of the GL. Again, jmho.

27199d72-01d5-44de-982e-a09d78e6f351.gif

There are so many variables it doesn’t necessarily have too. I’m sure there are permutations where we could get both. But everything is related. Every wave in the flow affects the ones after in some way.  So wishing for a different solution than the one that lead to a HECS 2 days later is very dangerous. It’s unpredictable what change in wave a does to wave b. But if I see a run that gives me 20” I don’t go getting greedy and wishing for changes lol. I guess I’m more conservative than Ji with my snow. 

BTW: great to see you posting again. Missed your insight. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ji said:

I am rooting for Jan 6th storm. Looks less comlicated. We don't do complicated.

What if Jan 6th is a rainer and Jan 10th is still OTS? Followed by extreme cold and bare ground.

Lots of unhappy people.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS ensembles has always had a weaker signal for Jan 9-10 than 6-7. The EPS is opposite, the latter being stronger than the first wave. 

I think the op 6z GFS went back to what its ensemble suite was showing the whole time, while the op Euro was showing one of the upper potential scenarios of the ensembles.

I usually lean on the Euro+EPS because it has been the better performing model suite based on recent verification scores in the last couple of months. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mitchnick said:

6z Euro vs 0z. You can see better ridging north of the Great Lakes at 6z, likely caused by the stronger trough off the east coast, and a slightly weaker vort hitting the NW coast (that's the 1/6 system.) All of that would increase chances of a 6z Gfs scenario imho by pushing a slightly weaker system to the south of its cutter depiction on the Euro's 0z run. Plenty of time to change, and likely with each run until we're closer.

P.s. I don't think the fact the 1/6 system is shown coming in slightly north would make a difference due to stronger ridging north of the GL. Again, jmho.

27199d72-01d5-44de-982e-a09d78e6f351.gif

We in the game !!!!  Welcome back 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

The GFS ensembles has always had a weaker signal for Jan 9-10 than 6-7. The EPS is opposite, the latter being stronger than the first wave. 

I think the op 6z GFS went back to what its ensemble suite was showing the whole time, while the op Euro was showing one of the upper potential scenarios of the ensembles.

I usually lean on the Euro+EPS because it has been the better performing model suite based on recent verification scores in the last couple of months. 

We haven’t had much to track around here but I keep an eye on multiple regions for skiing interests and the gfs has been a total train wreck anecdotally on almost all the storms I’ve tracked. Flipping around run to run and almost invariably eventually caving to a solution closer to the euro.  Btw the gefs still has an issue with under dispersion so if the op goes off on a tangent the ensembles almost always follow it and that makes them kinda useless for what they’re intended. 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MN Transplant said:

That 00z Euro run was wild.  Over an inch of QPF falling into a deep cold airmass where the surface temps stay <15 degrees during the day.

Yeah, I don’t think enough was made of that run last night. During the daytime that would’ve have garnered enough posts to shut this forum down. Ultimate cold smoke blizzard run just happened overnight. 

  • Like 5
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Btw the gefs still has an issue with under dispersion so if the op goes off on a tangent the ensembles almost always follow it and that makes them kinda useless for what their intended. 

What does under-dispersion mean? Is it just what you describe where it’s too similar to the OP? I guess it isn’t making enough tweaks for each different outcome?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mappy locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...