Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

January is the low point for PWAT climo in these parts. Sure you can get a big dog like 1996 or 2000, but the big game typically is found in February.

"PWAT"?

And also...I do question February as I see in the general thread that the nina seems to be a bit of a late bloomer and getting a bit more established. Makes me wonder if that means we see a more typical nina-like February torch or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

"PWAT"?

And also...I do question February as I see in the general thread that the nina seems to be a bit of a late bloomer and getting a bit more established. Makes me wonder if that means we see a more typical nina-like February torch or not.

https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=pwat

Quote
PWAT
Precipitable Water - measure of the depth of liquid water at the surface that would result after precipitating all of the water vapor in a vertical column over a given location, usually extending from the surface to 300 mb.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

Looks basically like climo to me, so I'd toss, but those maps rarely pan out anyway. Just get me to 2025 and then we can start looking at actual threats.

Except all the snow falls the last 7 days. Normally we see the whole 15 day mean look like that…if the run were to continue it would look better than climo. But you’re seeing a below climo week and an above one.  
 

This is a pretty good 7 day mean compared to what we typically see recently 

IMG_6245.thumb.png.73f8def6a2f5ef884373b13d40f72f8b.png

 

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

"PWAT"?

And also...I do question February as I see in the general thread that the nina seems to be a bit of a late bloomer and getting a bit more established. Makes me wonder if that means we see a more typical nina-like February torch or not.

Precipitable Water Amount. As @Bob Chill has said several times, we're at one of the drier times of the year so it's not surprising that we aren't seeing big dog snowstorms at D15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Except all the snow falls the last 7 days. Normally we see the whole 15 day mean look like that…if the run were to continue it would look better than climo. But you’re seeing a below climo week and an above one.  
 

This is a pretty good 7 day mean compared to what we typically see recently 

IMG_6245.thumb.png.73f8def6a2f5ef884373b13d40f72f8b.png

 

Until there is a persistent discrete threat, this is probably about as good as it gets at this range over a 5 or 7 day window. Problem is it can go right back to looking paltry the next run, and it really means nothing wrt the upcoming potential. 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Until there is a persistent discrete threat, this is probably about as good as it gets at this range over a 5 or 7 day window. Problem is it can go right back to looking paltry the next run, and it really means nothing wrt the upcoming potential. 

We really should still be looking at the general long wave pattern at this point not trying to worry too much about specific synoptic threats yet (except the Jan 3-4th wave) but people are getting anxious and acting like the day 10-15 stuff is day 5-10 or even less…

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

We really should still be looking at the general long wave pattern at this point not trying to worry too much about specific synoptic threats yet (except the Jan 3-4th wave) but people are getting anxious and acting like the day 10-15 stuff is day 5-10 or even less…

This happens every year we get a good pattern...

  1. the smartest posters (not me) identify the good pattern 2-3 weeks early.
  2. one week later, the dumber posters (this is me) panic because it hasn't snowed yet
  3. it doesn't actually snow 
    • this is optional - it could actually snow this time 
  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

This happens every year we get a good pattern...

  1. the smartest posters (not me) identify the good pattern 2-3 weeks early.
  2. one week later, the dumber posters (this is me) panic because it hasn't snowed yet
  3. it doesn't actually snow 
    • this is optional - it could actually snow this time 

It did actually snow both times we identified a better pattern last year. But not nearly as much as we hoped for. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

This happens every year we get a good pattern...

  1. the smartest posters (not me) identify the good pattern 2-3 weeks early.
  2. one week later, the dumber posters (this is me) panic because it hasn't snowed yet
  3. it doesn't actually snow 
    • this is optional - it could actually snow this time 

I'm not panicking--I'm just an impatient little bitch.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

This happens every year we get a good pattern...

  1. the smartest posters (not me) identify the good pattern 2-3 weeks early.
  2. one week later, the dumber posters (this is me) panic because it hasn't snowed yet
  3. it doesn't actually snow 
    • this is optional - it could actually snow this time 

I call this the human pendulum season.  I try to invite psych majors in here during winter months for their research papers/studies.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 5
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

This happens every year we get a good pattern...

  1. the smartest posters (not me) identify the good pattern 2-3 weeks early.
  2. one week later, the dumber posters (this is me) panic because it hasn't snowed yet
  3. it doesn't actually snow 
    • this is optional - it could actually snow this time 

This basically sums up the last five years on this forum.  

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Eskimo Joe said:

If you're speaking about temps, I would agree. So far this winter, every advertised torch has been muted as we get into the short and medium range. 

I'm not sure how well this upcoming mild stretch has been adveratised (haven't paid close attention), but it's looking mild through early next week.  It'll be interesting to see how well the ensembles paint reality by mid-January.  Looks like the main question will be whether we fall back into cold/dry or whether the southern stream/gom can get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, psuhoffman said:

It did actually snow both times we identified a better pattern last year. But not nearly as much as we hoped for. 

I’m close to the point where I’d be surprised if we get totally skunked. But that doesn’t mean big totals.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...