Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

7th still looking spicy. lots of confluence, good airmass in place, and a potent vort swinging through 

IMG_0728.thumb.png.6afcd9d5d3f156ab16d078f090cb3799.png

Mentioned it late last week I think the 4th system is the catalyst for a followup system around this time. Get the Jan 4 system to the 50/50 area, setup some decent confluence, get the ridging in the NAO domain in a favorable spot, and then game on. That's my feel on this whole progression anyway....4th system might be rushing it.

  • Like 6
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since 1950, Washington, DC has seen 16 6" (15.2 cm) or greater snowstorms in January. Below are the composite 500 mb height anomalies, clusters, and teleconnection combinations for such storms for reference.
image.jpeg.e63721eb3ff2f91b02f781d426702251.jpeg

Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, 87storms said:


Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line.

Dulles has had 18 January storms of 6”+ since 1964. Eight of those came in 4 winters (2 each in 1966, 1987, 1996 and 2000.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dulles has had 18 January storms of 6”+ since 1964. Eight of those came in 4 winters (2 each in 1966, 1987, 1996 and 2000.)

Yea I was just thinking I guess that’s not too bad. 4-6” is a healthy event and there’s probably quite a few more of those.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

Since 1950, Washington, DC has seen 16 6" (15.2 cm) or greater snowstorms in January. Below are the composite 500 mb height anomalies, clusters, and teleconnection combinations for such storms for reference.

image.jpeg.e63721eb3ff2f91b02f781d426702251.jpeg

Don this is amazing. Would you be able to run these for BWI and PHL as well?

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, frd said:

https://x.com/ryankanerWX/status/1872004512376127920

 

Appears that the EPS with trough axis too far East, even at hour 342, hopefully things change in future runs, if not might just end up with very cold and dry conditions, storms way offshore of the Mid Atlantic and even the NE.  

 

GfqxNL3W8AAVBZB.thumb.jpeg.749862d9158cd0f4f4ccddc0f09d3806.jpeg

That’s the mean trough position, with a ton of smoothing out at this range. 

  • Like 4
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 87storms said:


Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line.

The suburbs do better, as does IAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Medium range/long range models went much colder today. Big +PNA. Models like the Euro/GEM have been doing much better than the GFS. 

+PNA more associated with SECS , is that correct Chuck ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, donsutherland1 said:

I will post BWI and PHL in the next day or two. I have company here.

Go in the bathroom like everyone else here. You ever check model runs during Christmas dinner before? You can't be a savage and just break your phone out and start drooling at the dinner table. Boxing day anyone? Lol

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frd said:

https://x.com/ryankanerWX/status/1872004512376127920

 

Appears that the EPS with trough axis too far East, even at hour 342, hopefully things change in future runs, if not might just end up with very cold and dry conditions, storms way offshore of the Mid Atlantic and even the NE.  

 

GfqxNL3W8AAVBZB.thumb.jpeg.749862d9158cd0f4f4ccddc0f09d3806.jpeg

If the blocking is realized and a 50-50 manifests that should place the Trough further West.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The suburbs do better, as does IAD.

Agreed…were the clusters based off only those 18 cases? I took a machine learning class over the summer, hence why I’m interested in this stuff. I noticed there’s a couple of distinct clusters (assuming this was based off k-means, etc) with similar teleconnections. Also wondering if it would be better to adjust the snow total down to 4” to create a larger dataset.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 87storms said:


Agreed…were the clusters based off only those 18 cases? I took a machine learning class over the summer, hence why I’m interested in this stuff. I noticed there’s a couple of distinct clusters (assuming this was based off k-means, etc) with similar teleconnections. Also wondering if it would be better to adjust the snow total down to 4” to create a larger dataset.

I’m just curious, wasn’t 4” the criteria for a winter storm warning here before they changed it to 5”? Or has it always been 5”? My memory isn’t what it used to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like that wave around the 3rd is the first shot at something, but the trough axis isn’t great and spacing is meh. At least so far. However, that wave then potentially sets up our potential confluence for whatever else rolls off the PAC.

This is fun to look at lol..

e77de23ead5a498f90ecd0f3d1ce6819.jpg


.

  • Like 8
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Heisy said:

Looks like that wave around the 3rd is the first shot at something, but the trough axis isn’t great and spacing is meh. At least so far. However, that wave then potentially sets up our potential confluence for whatever else rolls off the PAC.

This is fun to look at lol..

e77de23ead5a498f90ecd0f3d1ce6819.jpg


.

 

 

Rather intense Davis Straits block depicted there. Pretty cool look. 

 

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...