Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,722
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rosented1234
    Newest Member
    Rosented1234
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ravensrule said:

The chances of the Goofus being right aren’t very high. 

It sucks in -NAO/+PNA regimes...the one thing maybe going in its favor here is the Pac is still screaming so the S/W traverses the country insanely fast.  The Euro has been owning the GFS for the last month or so on the grading numbers.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the 1 hand we need the 50/50 strong enough to thwart cutters as was showing up previously on modeling. But now, it's so strong and slow moving that it's shredding decent systems (look at all the snow west of the mts every model keeps showing.) 

The Atlantic is backed up like a morning after a T-bone steak. I think the best case, which we have no control over, is a weaker 50/50 because we still need it, just not as strong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://x.com/bamwxcom/status/1874549701657412001

An interesting observation with the north pacific heights by day 13-14-15 from the latest EPS... The blocking reloads and is poleward only further west. This will cause the entire lower 48 pattern to essentially step back west a few clicks. Aka the cold and stormy pattern reloads I suspect driven more by the low frequency background state. I tried to show you here on this gif.

GgO_Qe2XgAA2cMn.jpeg.908217ad38d9e2af24a6930a554cec7b.jpeg

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the hemming and hawing over the GFS deterministic output all while the GEFS has improved, for most run to run for the past 8 cycles lol 

I'm not saying we're going to get clobbered or that we're going to miss. I'm saying the trends are still decent for the area despite the deterministic outputs. I'm not worried at the moment. I'll let you know if I am! 

If there was anyone that should keep close tabs on the setup for shifts, it's NE MD just due to the nature of the confluence. Still could get snow up there, but it's likely to be greater further west and south. I have family near where I grew up, so I'm watching that area closely. 

trend-gefsens-2025010118-f132.sn10_acc-mean-imp.us_ma.thumb.gif.4bb9efbf78af5238023c37fa9d21a5bc.gif

  • Like 17
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

On the 1 hand we need the 50/50 strong enough to thwart cutters as was showing up previously on modeling. But now, it's so strong and slow moving that it's shredding decent systems (look at all the snow west of the mts every model keeps showing.) 

The Atlantic is backed up like a morning after a T-bone steak. I think the best case, which we have no control over, is a weaker 50/50 because we still need it, just not as strong.

It would help if it was actually located at 50-50. As modeled it is displaced too far SW.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillvilleWx said:

All the hemming and hawing over the GFS deterministic output all while the GEFS has improved, for most run to run for the past 8 cycles lol 

I'm not saying we're going to get clobbered or that we're going to miss. I'm saying the trends are still decent for the area despite the deterministic outputs. I'm not worried at the moment. I'll let you know if I am! 

If there was anyone that should keep close tabs on the setup for shifts, it's NE MD just due to the nature of the confluence. Still could get snow up there, but it's likely to be greater further west and south. I have family near where I grew up, so I'm watching that area closely. 

trend-gefsens-2025010118-f132.sn10_acc-mean-imp.us_ma.thumb.gif.4bb9efbf78af5238023c37fa9d21a5bc.gif

 Good post bro. Definitely  shows  improvement every run!!

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

It would help if it was actually located at 50-50. As modeled it is displaced too far SW.

That too. Anything to get it off the Massachusetts coast a little faster or weaken it some. We're sorta left relying on the old model biases of strengthening blocking too much at this range. Not a great position to be in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

things I dont understand 1 people say you cant track storms a week out but the mets all track storms a week out and they hint at something just to hint at it. if its wrong they dont mention it again or if its right they report on it for ratings I get that. What I dont get how models can be so wrong 1-2-3 days out at times like how does a low go from the east coast with a massive push of moisture and cold only then 1 model run go to a apps lake cutter and the storm be all rain in the 50s?  What info was put into that model run to make it go to one extreme to the other I wish we were told such things. 2 how since the model upgrade in 2011-14 have these models gotten worse imo I know other do feel this way. We have feed back errors and or just all out whacky solution.

I remember one storm from 2021 it was said it was going to be pushed to far south due to the cold air then what do you know the cold air vanished. The low moved west of us into western ohio this was said not to happen due to a whacky solution but it happenend. am I complaining sure but Its 2025 and we cant even get a storm 12-24 hours out let alone a week out correct. I dunno how many times a storm is 12 hours away and we just hear its to soon to know we have to wait and see.

 

Also if some one can direct me to a site where it actually shows the accuracy percentage of the models over the years that would be awesome. Like some say the euro is more accurate but how accurate is it 40% 30% etc 

  • Confused 1
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruin said:

things I dont understand 1 people say you cant track storms a week out but the mets all track storms a week out and they hint at something just to hint at it. if its wrong they dont mention it again or if its right they report on it for ratings I get that. What I dont get how models can be so wrong 1-2-3 days out at times like how does a low go from the east coast with a massive push of moisture and cold only then 1 model run go to a apps lake cutter and the storm be all rain in the 50s?  What info was put into that model run to make it go to one extreme to the other I wish we were told such things. 2 how since the model upgrade in 2011-14 have these models gotten worse imo I know other do feel this way. We have feed back errors and or just all out whacky solution.

I remember one storm from 2021 it was said it was going to be pushed to far south due to the cold air then what do you know the cold air vanished only to move west of us into western ohio this was said not to happen due to a whacky solution but it happenend. am I complaining sure but Its 2025 and we cant even get a storm 12-24 hours out let alone a week out correct. I dunno how many times a storm is 12 hours away and we just hear its to soon to know we have to wait and see.

 

Also if some one can direct me to a site where it actually shows the accuracy percentage of the models over the years that would be awesome. Like some say the euro is more accurate but how accurate is it 40% 30% etc 

 Too much overthinking it there lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...