Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,719
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Mike Rosen
    Newest Member
    Mike Rosen
    Joined

January: Medium/ Long Range: May the Force be with Us....


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

They don’t sneak up on us. You are completely correct.  But they overforecast  many events that never come to fruition. That’s what brings criticism 

But do they are are people reading the tool wrong?   A few years ago I created an objective tool and posted the 50% snowfall forecast from 24 hour cycles of the geps, gefs and eps to show people were interpreting it wrong due to bias.  They get excited about a run that shows snow and ignore the ones that don’t. They also use the mean which is skewed high by a few big snow solutions when the 50% plot snows what it really thinks. 
 

Right now for example based on the last 24 hour cycle we have about a 30% chance of a MECS level or higher snow and about a 50% of SECS. And about a 40% chance we get skunked the next 15 days. The most likely median outcome according to the whole guidance package is 1-4” across the area.  
 

But that’s really good. Having a better than 50% chance of snow in general but more so having a 30% chance at that range of a mecs level event is a rare high probability chance. But it’s still more likely to fail and that’s not the guidance failing that’s people who see the hecs runs and ignore that most don’t actually show that. 
 

At day 10 all we can do is identify threat windows and because we live in a very low snow area many of them will fail.  But we spend most of many winters in periods where there is absolutely no chance of a mecs snow. So having a period with 30% is worth noting imo!  

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...