CAPE Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago There is still a storm signal for the 4th on the 12z GEFS, but a bit weaker than the last 2 runs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 7th still looking spicy. lots of confluence, good airmass in place, and a potent vort swinging through 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 10 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said: 7th still looking spicy. lots of confluence, good airmass in place, and a potent vort swinging through Mentioned it late last week I think the 4th system is the catalyst for a followup system around this time. Get the Jan 4 system to the 50/50 area, setup some decent confluence, get the ridging in the NAO domain in a favorable spot, and then game on. That's my feel on this whole progression anyway....4th system might be rushing it. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago Since 1950, Washington, DC has seen 16 6" (15.2 cm) or greater snowstorms in January. Below are the composite 500 mb height anomalies, clusters, and teleconnection combinations for such storms for reference. 14 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Since 1950, Washington, DC has seen 16 6" (15.2 cm) or greater snowstorms in January. Below are the composite 500 mb height anomalies, clusters, and teleconnection combinations for such storms for reference.Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVclimo Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 33 minutes ago, 87storms said: Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line. Dulles has had 18 January storms of 6”+ since 1964. Eight of those came in 4 winters (2 each in 1966, 1987, 1996 and 2000.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Reilly Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Soo..... what happened to Mostly Sunny high 38 today??? Got the temp right but the sun hasn't made an appearance at any point today. Sounds like a pretty blown forecast at very short leads. Must be an inversion layer those are always pains to forecasts. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbmclean Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 44 minutes ago, WVclimo said: Dulles has had 18 January storms of 6”+ since 1964. Eight of those came in 4 winters (2 each in 1966, 1987, 1996 and 2000.) I thought that 2000 was a one-shot year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Dulles has had 18 January storms of 6”+ since 1964. Eight of those came in 4 winters (2 each in 1966, 1987, 1996 and 2000.)Yea I was just thinking I guess that’s not too bad. 4-6” is a healthy event and there’s probably quite a few more of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, donsutherland1 said: Since 1950, Washington, DC has seen 16 6" (15.2 cm) or greater snowstorms in January. Below are the composite 500 mb height anomalies, clusters, and teleconnection combinations for such storms for reference. Don this is amazing. Would you be able to run these for BWI and PHL as well? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVclimo Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 27 minutes ago, cbmclean said: I thought that 2000 was a one-shot year? IAD picked up another 6.3” on 1/30, after the surprise snow the previous week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago https://x.com/ryankanerWX/status/1872004512376127920 Appears that the EPS with trough axis too far East, even at hour 342, hopefully things change in future runs, if not might just end up with very cold and dry conditions, storms way offshore of the Mid Atlantic and even the NE. 1 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 18 minutes ago, frd said: https://x.com/ryankanerWX/status/1872004512376127920 Appears that the EPS with trough axis too far East, even at hour 342, hopefully things change in future runs, if not might just end up with very cold and dry conditions, storms way offshore of the Mid Atlantic and even the NE. That’s the mean trough position, with a ton of smoothing out at this range. 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, 87storms said: Wow…only 16 in nearly 75 years during the coldest month of the year? Definitely less than I expected. I’d be curious how many some of the suburbs like Germantown to Columbia have had. Undoubtedly, a significant difference once you get 10-15 minutes west of the fall line. The suburbs do better, as does IAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Medium range/long range models went much colder today. Big +PNA. Models like the Euro/GEM have been doing much better than the GFS. 10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: Medium range/long range models went much colder today. Big +PNA. Models like the Euro/GEM have been doing much better than the GFS. +PNA more associated with SECS , is that correct Chuck ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 hour ago, Eskimo Joe said: Don this is amazing. Would you be able to run these for BWI and PHL as well? I will post BWI and PHL in the next day or two. I have company here. 4 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, donsutherland1 said: I will post BWI and PHL in the next day or two. I have company here. Go in the bathroom like everyone else here. You ever check model runs during Christmas dinner before? You can't be a savage and just break your phone out and start drooling at the dinner table. Boxing day anyone? Lol 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 23 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: I will post BWI and PHL in the next day or two. I have company here. No rush on that at all, was just curious to see the data. Merry Christmas sir! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowmagnet Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago I'm at Dulles waiting for my flight to France. I return on the Jan 4th, so I would appreciate an epic storm on the 5th or the 8th. Just throwing that out there.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Boone Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 hour ago, frd said: https://x.com/ryankanerWX/status/1872004512376127920 Appears that the EPS with trough axis too far East, even at hour 342, hopefully things change in future runs, if not might just end up with very cold and dry conditions, storms way offshore of the Mid Atlantic and even the NE. If the blocking is realized and a 50-50 manifests that should place the Trough further West. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago The suburbs do better, as does IAD.Agreed…were the clusters based off only those 18 cases? I took a machine learning class over the summer, hence why I’m interested in this stuff. I noticed there’s a couple of distinct clusters (assuming this was based off k-means, etc) with similar teleconnections. Also wondering if it would be better to adjust the snow total down to 4” to create a larger dataset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 27 minutes ago, 87storms said: Agreed…were the clusters based off only those 18 cases? I took a machine learning class over the summer, hence why I’m interested in this stuff. I noticed there’s a couple of distinct clusters (assuming this was based off k-means, etc) with similar teleconnections. Also wondering if it would be better to adjust the snow total down to 4” to create a larger dataset. I’m just curious, wasn’t 4” the criteria for a winter storm warning here before they changed it to 5”? Or has it always been 5”? My memory isn’t what it used to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago I’m just curious, wasn’t 4” the criteria for a winter storm warning here before they changed it to 5”? Or has it always been 5”? My memory isn’t what it used to be. I think it used to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Looks like that wave around the 3rd is the first shot at something, but the trough axis isn’t great and spacing is meh. At least so far. However, that wave then potentially sets up our potential confluence for whatever else rolls off the PAC.This is fun to look at lol... 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Heisy said: Looks like that wave around the 3rd is the first shot at something, but the trough axis isn’t great and spacing is meh. At least so far. However, that wave then potentially sets up our potential confluence for whatever else rolls off the PAC. This is fun to look at lol.. . Rather intense Davis Straits block depicted there. Pretty cool look. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, frd said: +PNA more associated with SECS , is that correct Chuck ? The biggest snowstorms have a +PNA/Gulf of Alaska low pressure. But it is also an on-average drier pattern, so more variance. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Jan 4th is a thread the needle but an important system that strengthens NAO blocking, sets up a quasi 50/50, and boosts confluence as waves press east under and over the pna via a split flow. Jan 6-10 is the real period to watch. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Merry Christmas and Happy Hannukah! That PNA 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormy Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Terpeast said: I’m just curious, wasn’t 4” the criteria for a winter storm warning here before they changed it to 5”? Or has it always been 5”? My memory isn’t what it used to be. The warning criteria used to be 4" or more. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now