Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,634
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    JDClapper
    Newest Member
    JDClapper
    Joined

Jester January


Prismshine Productions
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

No arguments, no wolf attacks..all because computer simulations give us a chance. 

We’re like dogs tapping our way to the kitchen when there’s food on the counter…

The upcoming stretch is our best legit snow pattern in a while.  Let's hope we at least get one region-wide warning event for SNE. I like that period from 5th or 6th through mid-month.  The weenies need this!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

I’d prefer something in the 980’s. Any lower (hell even in the 980’s this could become a concern) you start to worry about precip shield becoming more banded…which has screwed us in the past. Really hoping this period around the 10th works. 
 

edit 70’s to 80’s

What's wrong with increased banding? Is it just that it isolates high totals to localized areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kazimirkai said:

What's wrong with increased banding? Is it just that it isolates high totals to localized areas?

If precipitation becomes too banded then you're dealing with too many subsidence zones. There were a few big ones I think this happened with in the early 2010's. Areas that got into the subsidence zones got screwed mightily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

If precipitation becomes too banded then you're dealing with too many subsidence zones. There were a few big ones I think this happened with in the early 2010's. Areas that got into the subsidence zones got screwed mightily. 

Do you mean gravity waves?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember which one it was...maybe it was 2013? But I remember getting royally screwed in West Hartford...I mean I think I still got around a foot or so but a far cry from the 18-24'' expected. I remember alot of pissed off people that night because the radar was just so bandy...it was like looking at a tropical system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

The coast actually was close to jacking here. It was more from marshfield south that had some issues. I think Logan had at least 17”. Had almost 20 here.  The tides were the biggest issue. Pretty much unprecedented flooding, surge higher than blizzard of 78. Luckily we didn’t have the wave action otherwise the coast would have been devastated. 
 

Unfortunately the real devastation happened two months later. One of the most powerful nor’easters I’ve witnessed. Was mostly rain though.

Referring to the March 7 2018 storm? That was way more painful for me than it should have been. I still believed in dynamic cooling then…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...