Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,741
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    snown91
    Newest Member
    snown91
    Joined

Jester January


Prismshine Productions
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, H2Otown_WX said:

FWIW: https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=EC&fhr=F144&rundt=2025010600&map=tbl

You'll notice some ominous analogs in the top 5 including 2/10/10 and 1/20/00 :yikes:

I couldn't recall the storm in February of 2014 listed there but apparently the Cape got crushed: https://rightweather.com/2014/02/southern-new-england-snow-totals-february-15-2014/

Using purely analogs of the GFS evolution it would appear the ceiling of potential is 1/27/11.

 

Yep and a day before we got a significant snowstorm and a few days after as well

https://www.jdjweatherconsulting.com/past-storms-13-14

I still think 13-14 was probably the most well rounded perfect winters we've ever seen. It wasn't the biggest but it was cold and had multiple snowstorms in D-J-F

02_15.14_jdj_v3_snowfall_totals.thumb.jpg.b8cad68643208869599bda61ef02c8df.jpgFeb_15_2014_Snow_Anal_box.thumb.png.c46fd1dfabf1ee9944f78f9e28d452b8.png

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seeing much opportunity for meaningful precipitation during this portion of the forecast. The general W to NW flow should drive any potential ocean-effect mainly offshore over the coastal waters. The next chance for precipitation may come late this weekend. There remains a large amount of uncertainty concerning the details. There are a lot of moving parts, that must come together in just the right
way, to produce a significant impact on southern New England. Thusfar, the guidance has depicted many possible solutions, in some
cases from one run the next. This is a sign it is way too early to get focused on a singular answer. We still need to remain alert to
the possibilities for now. It will likely be several days before these details come into better focus. For now, stayed close to the NationalBlend solution, as that is ensemble-based.
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dendrite said:

6z gfs phases the northern stream in really early into w tx. That lead s/w ejecting out of baja still looks like a problem to me wave spacing wise. The downstream ridging just can’t amplify enough to get the bigger dog up here.

IMG_4550.jpeg

You also have a crap ridge out west with another s/w crashing into the PAC NW. Too much shit going on. Going to need to see big changes. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dendrite said:

6z gfs phases the northern stream in really early into w tx. That lead s/w ejecting out of baja still looks like a problem to me wave spacing wise. The downstream ridging just can’t amplify enough to get the bigger dog up here.

IMG_4550.jpeg

Appropriate i guess that this image on the bottom right looks like a sad man sleeping 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kitz Craver said:

Looks like that new NW pacific shortwave is gonna act as a kicker

Kind of acts to keep the ridge sort of folding over.  I agree with Dendrite that the initial s/w doesn’t allow the flow to buckle much.  We’ll see what 12z does,  but we need some large changes in the flow. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...