Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,751
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Fuji Kapesta
    Newest Member
    Fuji Kapesta
    Joined

Jester January


Prismshine Productions
 Share

Recommended Posts

You could kind of see that disconnect as early as 90h imo
00z
EicN0rU.png
 
12z
iwUnpy9.png
 
But it’s really evident 18 hours later
00z
hqlmI4b.png
 
12z
Ckksa9x.png
 
My concern is that this disconnect shows up sooner rather than later so we need more immediate changes, but I agree with you that setting aside the surface depiction and just looking at 500, there’s not as much reason to be discouraged as you’d think. 

Good post, that was my point earlier this morning that the phase we need is almost at day 4 so I was hoping by 18z today we started seeing some hits across guidance. Then the 6z euro happened lol. Going to be tough but I guess you never know

I know you guys hurting, but down here in Philly I haven’t seen a 6” snowstorm in like 4 years
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

If we see uncle starting to get a clue, and/or the Canadian, then I'll believe we have a real shot.  Unless or until that happens, these on again off again runs of the GFS and Euro are meaningless.  But that had better happen very soon.

If the gfs and euro consistently show a hit sustained run to run I could care less about cmc or uncle which have been pretty bad for quite awhile now.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Icon, CMC and Uncle, Don't hold much weight.

Those are a waste, not sure why people waste time looking at those. Big deal they get something right every 5 years. Let's say one of these score a scoop over other guidance,

1) How the hell are you going to know that in advance?

2) Who would even take them seriously if they're deviating from other guidance? 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

If we see uncle starting to get a clue, and/or the Canadian, then I'll believe we have a real shot.  Unless or until that happens, these on again off again runs of the GFS and Euro are meaningless.  But that had better happen very soon.

Really?  This sounds silly.  How long have you been around here?  Those two models couldn’t find their ass if it was sitting on their face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, weathafella said:

If the gfs and euro consistently show a hit sustained run to run I could care less about cmc or uncle which have been pretty bad for quite awhile now.

Agreed. Though any other guidance showing it does help confidence. 
 

But my view is either this is going to come back quickly or it’s gone. I’d expect to see clear improvements by 12z tomorrow if a decent hit is going to happen. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

I'll remind you of this post if this ends up a complete miss, since CMC and Uncle have called a miss from the beginning.

I feel like this will be one of these instances where the NAM will be close and we would all be wishing for the dgex to make a comeback....not saying it will be right, just that the NAM will some how show some sort of crazy solution to suck us all back in....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Those are a waste, not sure why people waste time looking at those. Big deal they get something right every 5 years. Let's say one of these score a scoop over other guidance,

1) How the hell are you going to know that in advance?

2) Who would even take them seriously if they're deviating from other guidance? 

I couldn't care less if they never posted the CMC or UkMet again... Seriously, I've never waited to see them before finalizing a forecast!  Lol

  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

I'll remind you of this post if this ends up a complete miss, since CMC and Uncle have called a miss from the beginning.

All that proves is ...nothing.   Solutions beyond d6 are often random luck.  So you can't say ICON/CMC etc had this all along.  I didn't include uncle because how many systems did models converge on only for uncle to send it to Bermuda inside of 72 hours.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

Longer than you.

gray-wolf.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=r-B54

Bud, the only point is those models are not what you want to show anything.   If the two big boys converge in on a solution..it won’t matter if, or when they come on board.  

I mean I wouldn’t doubt that if the big boys say no go, those two models will show the opposite when that happens.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weathafella said:

All that proves is ...nothing.   Solutions beyond d6 are often random luck.  So you can't say ICON/CMC etc had this all along.  I didn't include uncle because how many systems did models converge on only for uncle to send it to Bermuda inside of 72 hours.... 

You know that is not true.  How many solutions over the years have we seen well beyond d6 which have been proven right?  Especially rainers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Bud, the only point is those models are not what you want to show anything.   If the two big boys converge in on a solution..it won’t matter if, or when they come on board.  

I mean I wouldn’t doubt that if the big boys say no go, those two models will show the opposite when that happens.   

As was said previously, other guidance showing it does help confidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

As was said previously, other guidance showing it does help confidence. 

I do understand that point.  But those two are just sub par.  If the big two come back..and show continuity a couple days from now, those two will eventually come on board toward the end. And if they didn’t, I don’t think it would matter much.  
 

But it’s all good. let’s hope we get a snow event. :snowing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

I do understand that point.  But those two are just sub par.  If the big two come back..and show continuity a couple days from now, those two will eventually come on board toward the end. And if they didn’t, I don’t think it would matter much.  
 

But it’s all good. let’s hope we get a snow event. :snowing:

Other guidance showing it to increase confidence was my only point.  I'm not singing any praises of the CMC or Uncle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 78Blizzard said:

You know that is not true.  How many solutions over the years have we seen well beyond d6 which have been proven right?  Especially rainers.

I think what I said was true key word being often.  I think it’s easy for models st long range without a lot of blocking to sniff a system out.  Details can change radically.  Of course if we’re getting a cutter and we don’t have nao to shunt it east models have less moving parts so verification is frequently better.

It seems that NAO and timing of northern and southern streams is really tenuous with model waffling in the medium range understandable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...